Acyclic Adjunction of Casin as a Way of Deriving the LDB Effects of Korean Complex Anaphors
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 16(2), 93-124. I propose in this paper that the ambiguity of Korean bimorphemic anaphors is due to their two different syntactic/morphological structures: procasin and PRO CASIN. The former, being base-generated as one-word pure reflexive in a complement position, obeys Binding Condition A much like English himself. The binding behavior of the latter would be similar to Bickerton's (1987) he himself, which Salgueiro & Marlo (2006) analyze as a complex form that can be derived from a syntactic operation acyclically adjoining emphatic himself to he at an adjunction level. Based upon this, I argue that the indexing possibilities of PRO CASIN ('pronominal anaphor') should be an intersection between the set of possible indices for PRO and the set of possible indices for CASIN.
Abstract
The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 16(2), 93-124. I propose in this paper that the ambiguity of Korean bimorphemic anaphors is due to their two different syntactic/morphological structures: procasin and PRO CASIN. The former, being base-generated as one-word pure reflexive in a complement position, obeys Binding Condition A much like English himself. The binding behavior of the latter would be similar to Bickerton's (1987) he himself, which Salgueiro & Marlo (2006) analyze as a complex form that can be derived from a syntactic operation acyclically adjoining emphatic himself to he at an adjunction level. Based upon this, I argue that the indexing possibilities of PRO CASIN ('pronominal anaphor') should be an intersection between the set of possible indices for PRO and the set of possible indices for CASIN.
참고문헌 (18)
- Adger, D., "Core Syntax:A Minimalist Approach" (2003), Oxford University Press
- Baker, M., "Relativized Minimality and Pronoun Incorporation", Linguistic Inquiry, 21, pp.289~297 (1990)
- Bickerton,D., "He himself: Anaphor, pronoun, or...?", Linguistic Inquiry, 18, pp.345~348 (1987), 345-348.
- Cole, P., "Principles and Parameters of Long Distance Reflexives", Linguistic Inquiry, 21, pp.1~22 (1990)
- Hendrick, R, "Minimalist Syntax" (2003), Blackwell
- Hinzen,W, "Mind Design and Minimal Syntax" (2006), Oxford University Press
- Hornstein, N., "Move! A Minimalist Theory of Construal" (2001), Blackwell
- Kim, Y-S, "Choysocwuuy caykwisa mwunpep ('Reflexives in Minimalist Grammar')" (1999), Hankwuk Mwunhwasa
- Lebeaux, D., "Language Acquisition and the Form of the Grammar", 박사, pp.1988
- Lee,C-M, "Issues in Korean Anaphora", In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Korean Linguistics, pp.339~358 (1988)
- Li,Y, "What Makes Long Distance Reflexives Possible?", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 2, pp.135~166 (1993), 135-166.
- Park,K., "Reflexive Anaphora in Korean", In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Korean Linguistics, pp.601~614 (1988)
- Radford,A, "Minimalist Syntax:Exploring the structure of English" (2004), Cambridge University Press
- Reinhart, T, "Reflexivity", Linguistic Inquiry, 24, pp.657~720 (1993)
- Safir, K, "The Syntax of Anaphora" (2004), Oxford University Press
- Salgueiro, G, "He himself and Binding Domains in a Minimalist framework" (2006), John Benjamins
- Seuren, P, "Chomsky's Minimalism" (2004), Oxford University Press
- Uriagereka,J, "Rhyme and Reason.Cambridge" (1998), MIT Press