친족명사의 공기어 양상과 네트워크 분석
0
조회
0
다운로드
26
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to explore how family nouns and their co-occurring words are portrayed in a Korean newspaper collection, the Trends 21 corpus (Kim et al., 2010). We adopt network analysis using co-occurring words with target words, thirty family nouns. The co-occurring words are regarded as not only semantically related but also mentally associated with target words. A network is a graph-based structure made up of entities which are connected by specific types of relationship. We have used Pajek (Nooy, Mrvar & Vladimir, 2005) to visualize the relationship between a target word and its co-occurring words. The nodes are labeled as target words and co-occurrences; the links are indicated with the t-score in this study. Based on the network analysis, we identify uses of co-occurring words among target family nouns as well as the structure of networks by connection and centrality value. In addition, we can find out distinctions among semanitc groups of family nouns; for example, 'couple' vs 'core-family'.
Abstract
This study aims to explore how family nouns and their co-occurring words are portrayed in a Korean newspaper collection, the Trends 21 corpus (Kim et al., 2010). We adopt network analysis using co-occurring words with target words, thirty family nouns. The co-occurring words are regarded as not only semantically related but also mentally associated with target words. A network is a graph-based structure made up of entities which are connected by specific types of relationship. We have used Pajek (Nooy, Mrvar & Vladimir, 2005) to visualize the relationship between a target word and its co-occurring words. The nodes are labeled as target words and co-occurrences; the links are indicated with the t-score in this study. Based on the network analysis, we identify uses of co-occurring words among target family nouns as well as the structure of networks by connection and centrality value. In addition, we can find out distinctions among semanitc groups of family nouns; for example, 'couple' vs 'core-family'.
참고문헌 (45)
- 강범모, "한국어의 텍스트,장르,문체,유형" (2000), 태학사
- 강범모, "언어,컴퓨터,코퍼스 언어학,In 컴퓨터를 이용한 국어 분석의 기초와 응용" (2003), 고려대학교 출판부
- 강범모, "공기 명사에 기초한 의미", 개념 연관성의 네트워크 구성, 2010, pp.32, 1~28[DOI]
- 고길곤, "정책네트워크 연구의 유용성과 사회연결망 이론 활용 방법의 고찰", 행정논총, 45(1), pp.138~164 (2007), 한국행정연구소
- 김용학, "사회 연결망 분석" (2007), 박영사
- 김응모, "국어 평행이동 자동사 낱말밭" (1989), 한신문화사
- 김응모, "일상언어 자동사 낱말밭" (2000), 한국문화사
- 김일환, "SJ-RIKS Corpus : 세종 형태의미 분석 코퍼스를 넘어서", 민족문화연구, 52(52), pp.373~403 (2010), 민족문화연구원
- 김일환, "공기 관계 네트워크를 이용한 감정명사의 사용 양상 분석", 한국어학, 49, pp.119~148 (2010), 한국어학회
- 김지형, "어휘장(낱말밭) 연구의 새로운 모색", 한국어의미학, 4, pp.281~311 (1999)
- 신문 텍스트 기반의 장기간 언어 사회 문화 연구, "김흥규", 고려대학교 민족문화연구원, ~ (2010)
- 박병선, "한국어 계량적 연구 방법론" (2005), 역락
- 배해수, "맛 그림씨의 낱말밭", 한글, 176, pp.67~91 (1982)
- 배해수, "낱말밭 분석 연구의 의의", 한글, 203, pp.213~231 (1989)
- 안귀남, "동성마을 친족호칭어의 사회언어학적 연구", 방언학, (2), pp.1~31 (2005)
- 윤영수, "복잡계개론" (2005), 삼성경제연구소
- 이성헌, "세종전자사전의 명사 의미부류체계", 세종전자사전 개발계획 학술 발표회 (2004)
- 최경봉, "국어 명사의 의미 연구" (1998), 태학사
- 최규일, "한국어의 친족호칭 어휘 연구", 국어교육, 55, pp.51~85 (1986)
- 한정한, "한국어 어휘의미망 구축을 위한 기초 연구" (2008), 보고사
- 홍사만, "국어 의미 분석론" (2008), 한국문화사
- 황도삼, "자연언어이해,In 컴퓨터과학시리즈" (1999), 홍릉과학출판사
- Brass,D.J, "Being in the right place,In A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization", Administratice Science Quarterly, 29, pp.518~539 (1984)
- Bhattacharya, S, "Mapping a research area at the micro level using co word analysis", Scientometrics, 43(3), pp.359~372 (1998)
- Callon, M, "Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research,In The case of polymer chemistry", Scientometrics, 22(1), pp.153~203 (1991)
- Church, K. W, "Lexical Acquisition,In Using On line Resources to Build a Lexicon", pp.115~164 (1991)
- Collins, A. M., "Experiments on Semantic Memory and Language Comprehension", pp.117~138 (1972), John Wiley
- Collins, A. M., "A Spreading Activation Theory of Semantic Processing", Psychological Review, 82, pp.407~428 (1975)
- Freidkin, N. E, "Structural Bases of Interpersonal Influence in Groups,In A Longitudinal Case Study", American Sociological Review, 58(6), pp.861~872 (1993)
- Ide, N, "Introduction to the Special Issue on Word Sense Disambiguation,In the State of Art", Computational Linguistics, 24(1), pp.1~39 (1998)
- Complex networks and human language, "Ke, J", ~, pp.cs (2007), 0701135
- Lyons, J, "Semantics. Volumes I and II" (1977), Cambridge University
- Miller, G.A, "WordNet,In A Lexical Database for English" (1995), MIT
- Newman, Mark E. J, "The structure and function of complex networks", SIAM Review, 45, pp.167~256 (2003)
- Newman, Mark E. J, "Analysis of weighted networks", Physical Review, 70, pp.056131~ (2004)
- Nida, "Language Structure and Translation,In Essays" (1975), Stanford University
- Nooy, Wouter, "Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek" (2005), Cambridge Univ
- Nooy, W. d, "vlado.fmf.uni-lj.si", pub, pajek, si[DOI]
- Ogden, C. K, "The Meaning of Meaning" (1923), Routledge and Kegan Paul
- Scott, J. P, "Social Network Analysis,In A Handbook" (2000), Sage Publications
- Spence, D. P, "Lexical co occurrence and association strength", Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 19(5), pp.317~330 (1990)
- Wasserman, S, "Social Network Analysis,In Methods and Applications" (1994), Cambridge University
- Whorf, B.L, "Language, thought, and reality,In Selected writing of Benjamin Lee Whorf" (1956), MIT
- Wolfram, S, "A New Kind of Science" (2002), Wolfram Media
- Veling, A, "Conceptual grouping in word co occurrence networks", pp.694~699 (1999), Morgan Kaufmann Publishers