The Dative Goal and Intervention Effects
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The so-called intervention effect may be driven by the dative argument when the nominative object undergoes Agree with T. At this point, the nominative object cannot move to spec-T. The goal- or object-oriented honorific morpheme tuli or the subject-oriented honorific morpheme si, which is marked on the verb, can appear only when its target is honorific. In this respect, as a Probe, the honorific morpheme tuli or si with an uninterpretable honorification feature, which is active due to the feature, should search down for its matching feature in a Goal. If an uninterpretable honorification feature in a Probe finds a matching feature in a Goal in its local c-command domain, then both features come into an operation called Agree (Chomsky, 2000). However, an intervention effect occurs whenever a non-honorific dative argument intervenes between an honorific v (i.e., tuli on v, here) and an honorific object. The dative argument in the higher clause triggers the intervention effect against its own anaphor binding when the coindexed anaphor phrase in the lower clause moves over the dative argument; hence, the anaphor binding in the copy position is cancelled. To sum up, the VP-dative argument triggers an intervention effect against both honorication agreement and anaphor binding.
Abstract
The so-called intervention effect may be driven by the dative argument when the nominative object undergoes Agree with T. At this point, the nominative object cannot move to spec-T. The goal- or object-oriented honorific morpheme tuli or the subject-oriented honorific morpheme si, which is marked on the verb, can appear only when its target is honorific. In this respect, as a Probe, the honorific morpheme tuli or si with an uninterpretable honorification feature, which is active due to the feature, should search down for its matching feature in a Goal. If an uninterpretable honorification feature in a Probe finds a matching feature in a Goal in its local c-command domain, then both features come into an operation called Agree (Chomsky, 2000). However, an intervention effect occurs whenever a non-honorific dative argument intervenes between an honorific v (i.e., tuli on v, here) and an honorific object. The dative argument in the higher clause triggers the intervention effect against its own anaphor binding when the coindexed anaphor phrase in the lower clause moves over the dative argument; hence, the anaphor binding in the copy position is cancelled. To sum up, the VP-dative argument triggers an intervention effect against both honorication agreement and anaphor binding.
참고문헌 (23)
- Ahn, S.-H, "What can Korean say about the v-VP structure?, In Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, IX", pp.251~264 (2001)
- Bobaljik, J, "A-chains at the PF-interface: Copies and "covert" movement", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 20, pp.197~267 (2002)
- Boeckx, C, "Raising and experiencers" (2000), University of Maryland, College Park
- Boeckx, C, "Quirky agreement", Studia Linguistica, 54, pp.354~380 (2000)
- Chomsky, N., "Minimalist inquiries: The framework, In Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~155 (2000), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Derivation by phase, In Ken Hale: A life in language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N, "On phases", pp.2005
- Cuervo, M. C, "A control-vs-raising theory of dative experiencers", pp.2003
- Holmberg, A, "Agreement and movement in Icelandic raising constructions", Lingua, 113, pp.997~1019 (2003)
- 정은경, "사역형의 통사적 분석", 언어, 27(4), pp.641~659 (2002), 한국언어학회
- 김선웅, "On the Dative Intervention Effect on Raising to Subject", 생성문법연구, 15(4), pp.649~660 (2005), 한국생성문법학회
- Kuno, S, "The structure of the Japanese language" (1973), MIT Press
- Larson, R, "Double objects revisited: reply to Jackendoff", Linguistic Inquiry, 21, pp.589~632 (1990)
- Lebeaux, D, "Relative clauses, licensing, and the nature of the derivation", Syntax and Semantics, 25, pp.209~238 (1991)
- 이두원, "Goals in the Ditransitive Construction vs. Syntactic Subject Causees in the Morphological Causative", 현대문법연구, 47(47), pp.53~72 (2007), 현대문법학회
- 이두원, "Dative Arguments in Unaccusative and Passive Constructions", 언어와언어학, 56(56), pp.227~252 (2012), 언어연구소
- Lee, D.-W., "Scope freezing effect vs. scope thawing effect in the numeral quantifiers IO-DO order, In Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, X", pp.453~466 (2010)
- Lee, I.-H., "Empathy and hearer-based honorifics in Korean, In Studies in Korean syntax and semantics by Susumu Kuno", pp.87~138 (2004), Pagijong Press
- Frozen scope and week crossover in ditransitives, "Nakanishi, K.", MIT, 109~126 (2001)
- Niinuma, F., "The syntax of honorification", 박사, pp.2003
- Jong-Un Park, "Intervention Effects in Experiencer Constructions and Their Implications for the Theory of Move and Agree*", 생성문법연구, 14(2), pp.3~3 (2004), 한국생성문법학회
- Song, H., "Causatives and resultatives in Korean", 박사, pp.2005
- Stepanov, A., "Late adjunction and minimalist phrase structure", Syntax, 4, pp.94~125 (2001)