Syntax and Semantics of English Nonrestrictive Relative Clause Constructions
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 16(3), 279-299. In the literature on the ordering of main and subordinate or adverbial clauses (e.g., Hawkins 1992, Arnold et al 2000, Diessel 2005), and dative alternation (e.g., Pinker 1989, Pesetsky 1995, Krifka 2004), almost all analyses have tried to show what factors are responsible for the different orderings. One of the common findings of the previous analyses is that different information structures require different word orderings. To date very few studies have been conducted to show how information structure interacts with acquisition of such ordering variants by learners of English as a foreign language like Korean learners. The present study tries to show to what extent the factor of structuring information affects decisions on the word orderings of the two constructions by Korean learners of English. For this purpose, two experiments were conducted, and their results show that the syntactic knowledge of L1(Korean) plays a more decisive role in choosing correct orderings of the two constructions than the factor of structuring information.
Abstract
The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 16(3), 279-299. In the literature on the ordering of main and subordinate or adverbial clauses (e.g., Hawkins 1992, Arnold et al 2000, Diessel 2005), and dative alternation (e.g., Pinker 1989, Pesetsky 1995, Krifka 2004), almost all analyses have tried to show what factors are responsible for the different orderings. One of the common findings of the previous analyses is that different information structures require different word orderings. To date very few studies have been conducted to show how information structure interacts with acquisition of such ordering variants by learners of English as a foreign language like Korean learners. The present study tries to show to what extent the factor of structuring information affects decisions on the word orderings of the two constructions by Korean learners of English. For this purpose, two experiments were conducted, and their results show that the syntactic knowledge of L1(Korean) plays a more decisive role in choosing correct orderings of the two constructions than the factor of structuring information.
참고문헌 (28)
- Arnold,D., "Non-restrictive relatives are not orphans", Journal of Linguistics, 43, pp.271~309 (2007)
- Auran, C., "Appositive relative clauses and their prosodic realization in spoken discourse: A corpus study of phonetic aspects in British English", Proceedings of the Workshop on Constraints in Discourse (2006)
- Blakemore,D., "And-parentheticals", Journal of Pragmatics, 37, pp.1165~1181 (2005)
- Blakemore,D., "Divisions of labour: The analysis of parentheticals", Lingua, 116(10), pp.1670~1687 (2006)
- Bolinger,D., "Intonation and its Uses: Melody in Grammar and Discourse" (1989), Edward Arnold
- Burton-Roberts,N., "Parentheticals (Encyclopaedia of Language and Linguistics)" (2005), Elsevier
- Deh N., "Parentheticals: an Introduction" (2007), John Benjamins
- Emonds,J., "Appositive Relatives Have No Properties", Linguistic Inquiry, 10, pp.211~243 (1979)
- Espinal,M.T., "The representation of disjunct constituents", Language, 67(4), pp.726~762 (1991)
- Fabb,N., "The Difference between English Restrictive and Non- restrictive Relative Clauses", Journal of Linguistics, 26, pp.57~78 (1990)
- Ginsburg, J., "Interrogative Investigations: The Form, Meaning and Use of English Interrogatives" (2000), CSLI Publications
- Haegeman,L., "Parenthetical adverbials: The radical orphanage approach", pp.232~254 (1988), Kaitakushi
- Ifantidou-Trouki,E., "Sentential adverbs and relevance", Lingua, 90, pp.69~90 (1993)
- Jackendoff,R., "X'-Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure" (1977), The MIT Press
- McCawley,J., "Parentheticals and Discontinuous Constituent Structure", Linguistic Inquiry, 13, pp.91~106 (1982)
- Pak,Sooran, "Dual Identity of Non-restrictive Relative Clauses in English", 석사, pp.2008
- Perzanowski,D., "Appositive Relatives Do Have Properties", pp.355~368 (1980), NELS X
- Pollard, C. J., "Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar" (1994), University of Chicago Press
- Quirk, R., "A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language" (1985), Longman
- Ross. J. R., "Constraints on Variables in Syntax", 박사, pp.1967
- Safir,K., "Relative Clauses in a Theory of Binding and Levels", Linguistic Inquiry, pp.663~689 (1986)
- Sag,I., "English relative clause constructions", Journal of Linguistics, 33, pp.431~483 (1997)
- Sag, I., "Syntax: A Formal Introduction" (2003), CSLI Publications
- Smith,C., "Determiners and Relative Clauses in a Generative Grammar of English", Language 40, pp.37~52 (1964)
- Taglicht, J., "Constraints on intonational phrasing in English", Journal of Linguistics, 34(1), pp.181~211 (1998)
- De Vries,M., "Appositive Relative Clauses", Linguistics In the Netherlands, 17, pp.221~231 (2000)
- De Vries,M., "The Syntax of Relativization", 박사, pp.2002
- De Vries, M., "The syntax of appositive relativization: On specifying coordination, false free relatives and promotion", Linguistic Inquiry, 37, pp.229~270 (2006)