동사이동은 통사이동으로 부적절한가?
Is verb movement as a syntactic operation illegitimate?
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Verb movement has appeared in many versions of generative grammar and the minimalist program. In GB as an instance of Move-α, verb movement was thought to be subject to standard well-formedness conditions applying to syntax. However, in the case of adjunction of a lower head to a higher head, verb movement operation violates several well-motivated constraints on syntactic structure, thus leading to Chomsky’s (2001) claim that head movement can be attributed to PF and later the Chomsky’s (2021) claim that verb movement takes place in the morphological component under Merge system. In this article, I argue that verb movement operation is a syntactic one and show how to deal with the problems raised by adjunction analysis in syntax. Moreover among the three recent approaches designed to get rid of multi-dominance caused by verb movement adjunction it is concluded that Kim’s (2023) labeling algorithm approach (amalgamating X0 and Y0 if X0 intersects Y0) is preferred to the others, showing that this approach is totally compliant with the standardly suggested minimalism.
Abstract
The Verb movement has appeared in many versions of generative grammar and the minimalist program. In GB as an instance of Move-α, verb movement was thought to be subject to standard well-formedness conditions applying to syntax. However, in the case of adjunction of a lower head to a higher head, verb movement operation violates several well-motivated constraints on syntactic structure, thus leading to Chomsky’s (2001) claim that head movement can be attributed to PF and later the Chomsky’s (2021) claim that verb movement takes place in the morphological component under Merge system. In this article, I argue that verb movement operation is a syntactic one and show how to deal with the problems raised by adjunction analysis in syntax. Moreover among the three recent approaches designed to get rid of multi-dominance caused by verb movement adjunction it is concluded that Kim’s (2023) labeling algorithm approach (amalgamating X0 and Y0 if X0 intersects Y0) is preferred to the others, showing that this approach is totally compliant with the standardly suggested minimalism.
참고문헌 (33)
- 김대익, "동사이동과 짝병합", 현대문법연구, (112), pp.47~68 (2021), 현대문법학회
- Baker, M., "The mirror principle and the morphosyntactic explanation", Linguistic Inquiry, 16, pp.373~415 (1985)
- Baltin, M., "Movement to the higher V is remnant movement", Linguistic Inquiry, 33, pp.653~669 (2002)
- Boeckx, C., "Head-ing towards PF", Linguistic Inquiry, 32, pp.345~355 (2001)
- Brody, M., "Mirror principle. Syntactic representation in perfect syntax", Linguistic Inquiry, 31, pp.29~56 (2000)
- Chomsky, N., "Syntactic structures" (1957), Mouton
- Chomsky, N., "The minimalist program", pp.129~166 (1995), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Minimalist program for linguistic theory", ms, pp.1993
- Chomsky, N., "The minimalist program" (1995), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Step by step: essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~157 (2000), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Ken Hale: a life in language", pp.1~53 (2001), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "The cartography of syntactic structures", pp.104~131 (2004), Oxford University Press
- Chomsky, N., "Problems of projection", Lingua, 130, pp.33~49 (2013)
- Chomsky, N., "Structures, strategies and beyond: studies in honor of Adrian Belletti", pp.3~16 (2015), John Benjamins
- Chomsky, N., "Some puzzling foundational issues: The reading program", Catalan Journal of Linguistics, (Special), pp.263~285 (2019)
- Chomsky, N., "Minimalism: where are we now, and where can we hope to go", Gengo Kenkyu, 160, pp.1~41 (2021)
- Chomsky, N., "The miracle creed and SMT", ms, pp.2023
- Citko, B., "On the nature of merge: external merge; internal merge, and parallel merge", Linguistic Inquiry, 36, pp.475~496 (2005)
- Dékány, É., "Approaches to head movement: a critical assessment", Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 3(65), pp.1~43 (2018)
- Edmonds, J., "The verbal complex V′- V in French", Linguistic Inquiry, 9, pp.151~175 (1978)
- Fiengo, R., "On trace theory", Linguistic Inquiry, 8(1), pp.35~62 (1977)
- Grodzinsky, Y., "The neurology of empty categories aphasics' failure to detect ungrammaticality", Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10(2), pp.281~292 (1998)
- Kayne. S., "Notes on English agreement" (1989), Graduate Center, CUNY
- Lapointe, S., "Lexical Grammar", pp.215~254 (1980), Foris
- Lecher, W., "Interpretive effects of head movement", pp.2005
- Matushansky, O., "Head movement in linguistic theory", Linguistic Inquiry, 37, pp.69~109 (2006)
- Moro, A., "The duality of syntax: unstable structures, labelling and linearization", ~ (2023)
- Pollock, J. Y., "Verb movement, UG and the structure of IP", Linguistic Inquiry, 20, pp.365~424 (1989)
- Schoorlemmer, E., "Proceedings of the 29th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics", pp.232~240 (2012), Cascadilla Proceedings Project
- Roberts, I., "Head movement and the minimalist program", ~ (2010)
- Omune, J., "A merge-based approach to head adjunction", Journal of Inquiry and Research, 109, pp.167~185 (2019)
- Ouhalla, J., "Functional categories and parametric variation" (1991), Routledge
- Travis, L., "Parameters and effects of word order variation", doctor, pp.1984