入關前 淸의 朝鮮에 대한 ‘三色人’ 刷還要求
A Request for repatriation of “Three kinds of people” about Chosun in early Qing period
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This thesis aims to find out the influence that affect the national order and its triangular perspective through the Qing dynasty's request for repatriation of “Three kinds of people”. The repatriation about three kinds of people the Qing dynasty needs is caused by the Ming-Qing War(明淸戰爭) and natural disaster because of underpopulated situation. The Qing's dynasty perceived that three kinds of people's escape from the Liaodong(遼東) is the intimidation about their economical industry. They made the request as the method in order to solve the national crisis arised from cooperations(Ming-Mongol-Chosun, 明-蒙古-朝鮮). The conflict between Qing and Chosun stands out the issue Chinese(漢人), Korean(who captured by the Qing tried to come back Chosun, 走回人), Naturalized jurchen(向化女眞人) in turn. Through the victory of the Manchu's invasion(1627) and the second invasion(1636), The Qing dynasty officially requested Chousun to the responsibility about their repatriation. Because of this pushed obligation the Chosun dynasty should it but they maintain the defensive attitude. However, by pushing them to repatriation and wanting In-jo(仁祖) came to the Shenyang(瀋陽), the Qing dynasty could increase the number of repatriated people. The fundamental object that constantly requested three kinds of people's repatriation is that the Qing dynasty used them as the tool to check the Chosun dynasty because the Chosun dynasty were anxiety element. Through three kinds of people who come from the Chosun dynasty, they could enforce their strength in the east boundary, restored the land and had the labor. At the same time, the Qing's dynasty let them include their society and could make “the order of Qing”(大淸秩序) more firmly.
Abstract
This thesis aims to find out the influence that affect the national order and its triangular perspective through the Qing dynasty's request for repatriation of “Three kinds of people”. The repatriation about three kinds of people the Qing dynasty needs is caused by the Ming-Qing War(明淸戰爭) and natural disaster because of underpopulated situation. The Qing's dynasty perceived that three kinds of people's escape from the Liaodong(遼東) is the intimidation about their economical industry. They made the request as the method in order to solve the national crisis arised from cooperations(Ming-Mongol-Chosun, 明-蒙古-朝鮮). The conflict between Qing and Chosun stands out the issue Chinese(漢人), Korean(who captured by the Qing tried to come back Chosun, 走回人), Naturalized jurchen(向化女眞人) in turn. Through the victory of the Manchu's invasion(1627) and the second invasion(1636), The Qing dynasty officially requested Chousun to the responsibility about their repatriation. Because of this pushed obligation the Chosun dynasty should it but they maintain the defensive attitude. However, by pushing them to repatriation and wanting In-jo(仁祖) came to the Shenyang(瀋陽), the Qing dynasty could increase the number of repatriated people. The fundamental object that constantly requested three kinds of people's repatriation is that the Qing dynasty used them as the tool to check the Chosun dynasty because the Chosun dynasty were anxiety element. Through three kinds of people who come from the Chosun dynasty, they could enforce their strength in the east boundary, restored the land and had the labor. At the same time, the Qing's dynasty let them include their society and could make “the order of Qing”(大淸秩序) more firmly.
참고문헌 (60)
- "光海君日記", ~
- "仁祖實錄", ~
- "淸太祖實錄", ~
- "淸太宗實錄", ~
- "淸世祖實錄", ~
- "備邊司謄錄", ~
- "丙子錄", ~
- "瀋陽日記", ~
- "瀋陽狀啓", ~
- "山城日記", ~
- "通文館志", ~
- "明憙宗實錄", ~
- "朔方備乘", ~
- "承政院日記", ~
- "滿洲實錄", ~
- "建州見聞錄", ~
- "燃藜室記述", ~
- "淸史稿", ~
- "遲川集", ~
- "東北邊方輯要", ~
- "欽定滿洲源流考", ~
- 한국 역사상 포로 송환에 관한 연구, "강성문", 육군사관학교 화랑대연구소, ~ (2001)
- 김남윤, "역주 소현심양일기1" (2008), 민속원
- 김종원, "근세 동아시아관계사 연구" (1999), 혜안
- 김한규, "사조선록(使朝鮮錄)연구" (2011), 서강대학교 출판부
- 남의현, "明代遼東支配政策硏究" (2008), 강원대학교 출판부
- 세종대왕기념사업회, "國譯 通文館志, 2" (1998), 세종대왕기념사업회
- 세종대왕기념사업회, "國譯 심양장계 In 1～3" (2000), 세종대왕기념사업회
- 이삼성, "동아시아의 전쟁과 평화-전통시대 동아시아 2천년과 한반도, 1" (2009), 한길사
- 최소자, "명청시대 중․한관계사 연구" (1997), 이화여자대학교 출판부
- 崔學根, "國譯蒙文 滿洲實錄 上․下" (1992), 保景文化社
- 윤영인, "위태로운 변경" (2009), 동북아역사재단
- 한명기, "임진왜란과 한중관계" (1999), 역사비평사
- 한명기, "정묘․병자호란과 동아시아" (2009), 푸른역사
- 한성주, "조선전기 수직여진인 연구" (2010), 경인문화사
- 故宮博物院明淸檔案部, "淸代檔案史料叢編 14" (1978), 中華書局
- 孫文良, "明淸戰爭史略" (1986), 遼寧人民出版社
- 曹樹基, "中國人口史, 第4卷" (2000), 復旦大學出版社
- 趙英蘭, "淸代東北人口社會硏究" (2010), 吉林科學文獻出版社
- 叢佩遠, "中國東北史, 第3卷" (1998), 吉林文史出版社
- 姜性文, "丁卯․丙子胡亂期의 捕虜 送還 硏究", 軍史, 46 (2002), 국방부 국사편찬연구소
- 金九鎭, "13C~17C女眞 社會의 硏究: 金 滅亡 以後 淸 建國 以前까지 女眞社會의 組織을 中心으로", 박사, 사학, pp.1989
- 김문기, "17세기 강남의 기후변동과 명청교체", 박사, pp.2008
- 金鍾圓, "初期 朝淸關係에 대한 一考察", 歷史學報, 71 (1976), 역사학회
- 羅鍾一, "17世紀 危機論과 韓國史", 歷史學報, 94․95 (1982), 역사학회
- 노기식, "滿洲의 興起와 東아시아 秩序의 變動", 中國史硏究, 16 (2001), 중국사학회
- 朴溶玉, "丁卯亂 朝鮮被擄人 刷․贖還硏究", 史學硏究, 18 (1964), 한국사학회
- 朴溶玉, "丙子胡亂被擄人贖還考", 史叢, 9 (1964), 고려대학교 역사연구소
- 송미령, "入關 前 淸朝의 瀋陽館 統制樣相", 명청사연구, 30(30), pp.129~155 (2008), 명청사학회
- 송미령, "天聰年間(1627-1636年) 支配體制의 確立過程과 朝鮮政策", 중국사연구, (54), pp.161~190 (2008), 중국사학회
- 이기순, "후금의 경제난과 胡亂", 人文科學, 8 (2000), 홍익대학교 인문과학연구소
- 원정식, "명청시대 담배의 정치 · 사회경제사적 의의", 명청사연구, (24), pp.157~184 (2005), 명청사학회
- 조병학, "입관전 후금의 몽골 및 만주족 통합에 관한 연구", 박사, 동양사, pp.2002
- 한명기, "임진왜란 시기 ‘재조지은’의 형성과 그 의미", 東洋學, 29 (1999), 단국대학교 동양학연구소
- 한명기, "16, 17세기 明淸交替와 한반도 ―‘再造之恩’, 銀, 그리고 쿠데타의 변주곡―", 명청사연구, 22(22), pp.37~64 (2004), 명청사학회
- 한성주, "조선전기 두만강유역 ‘女眞 藩籬･藩胡’의 형성과 성격", 韓國史學報, 41(41), pp.163~201 (2010), 고려사학회
- 朴今海, "17世紀朝鮮人流入東北及其對後金(淸)社會的影響", 黑龙江民族丛刊, (1) (2004)
- 張佳生, "論八旗入關前民族人口的遷徒集結及其作用", 滿族硏究, (3) (2007)
- 張傑 安曉潁, "淸入關前新滿洲入旗考論-新滿洲硏究之四", 東北史地, (5) (2009)
- 陈鹏, "淸代前期東北地區赫哲 “新滿洲” 形成初探", 史学集刊, (6) (2007)