본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

인조 전반기 조선의 대명무역 규모와 그 구조

Quantitative Scale and Structure of Joseon-Ming Trade, 1623-1636 — International Trade in Yellow Sea Region —

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

This article examines the quantitative scale and structure of Joseon-Ming trade in the first half of King Injo’s reign, namely 1623-1636, focusing on the continuity and differentiation from Joseon’s international trade in previous periods, and the interconnectedness of the Ming-Joseon trade with the Joseon-Manchu and Joseon-Japan trade. In the first half of the Injo’s reign, the scale of Joseon-Ming trade expanded rapidly. Due to the Manchus’ takeover of Liaodong peninsula in 1623, Joseon's tribute routes were shifted to the sea, which greatly increased the transportation capacity of trade goods. As a result, in the 12th year of Injo (1634), it is estimated that the annual volume of trade in the Peking reached the level of 200,000 taels of silver. The trade market on Gado Island, where the Ming army stationed to contain the Manchus, accounted for another 100,000 to 200,000 taels of annual trade between the Ming and Joseon merchants. This greatly exceeded the size of the Joseon-Ming trade during the King Gwanghaegun’s reign. Joseon exported ginseng and silver to Ming, and imported silk and Chinese blue cotton cloth (靑布) in return. However, Joseon was unable to secure enough ginseng and silver for trade on its own. Joseon's sources of silver and ginseng were the official grain purchase of Ming garrison on Gado island, as well as Joseon's trade with the Manchus and Japan. Ming troops on Gado paid silver and Chinese goods to secure grain supply from Joseon government. In addition, after the first Manchu invasion of Korea (1627), the Manchus emerged as a new source of silver and ginseng. Also, Joseon was able to acquire silver from its trade with Japan, which had continued before the Imjin War (1592-1598). Joseon sold Chinese fabrics to the Manchus and Japan, and get paid by silver and ginseng, which was to be sold to Ming dynasty. In a nutshell Joseon was actively engaging in a intermediate trade with Ming, the Manchus, and Japan. From 1627 to 1636, Joseon was simultaneously engaged in diplomatic and trade relations with Ming, the Manchus, and Japan, functioning as a de facto hub to connect them all. Joseon capitalized on its geopolitical status to gain substantial economic profit. To understand East Asian international trade centered on the Ming in the first half of the 17th century, it is necessary to look not only at maritime trade in the coastal areas of southeastern China, but also at the trade between the Ming, Joseon, the Manchus, and Japan, with Joseon as the hub.

Abstract

This article examines the quantitative scale and structure of Joseon-Ming trade in the first half of King Injo’s reign, namely 1623-1636, focusing on the continuity and differentiation from Joseon’s international trade in previous periods, and the interconnectedness of the Ming-Joseon trade with the Joseon-Manchu and Joseon-Japan trade. In the first half of the Injo’s reign, the scale of Joseon-Ming trade expanded rapidly. Due to the Manchus’ takeover of Liaodong peninsula in 1623, Joseon's tribute routes were shifted to the sea, which greatly increased the transportation capacity of trade goods. As a result, in the 12th year of Injo (1634), it is estimated that the annual volume of trade in the Peking reached the level of 200,000 taels of silver. The trade market on Gado Island, where the Ming army stationed to contain the Manchus, accounted for another 100,000 to 200,000 taels of annual trade between the Ming and Joseon merchants. This greatly exceeded the size of the Joseon-Ming trade during the King Gwanghaegun’s reign. Joseon exported ginseng and silver to Ming, and imported silk and Chinese blue cotton cloth (靑布) in return. However, Joseon was unable to secure enough ginseng and silver for trade on its own. Joseon's sources of silver and ginseng were the official grain purchase of Ming garrison on Gado island, as well as Joseon's trade with the Manchus and Japan. Ming troops on Gado paid silver and Chinese goods to secure grain supply from Joseon government. In addition, after the first Manchu invasion of Korea (1627), the Manchus emerged as a new source of silver and ginseng. Also, Joseon was able to acquire silver from its trade with Japan, which had continued before the Imjin War (1592-1598). Joseon sold Chinese fabrics to the Manchus and Japan, and get paid by silver and ginseng, which was to be sold to Ming dynasty. In a nutshell Joseon was actively engaging in a intermediate trade with Ming, the Manchus, and Japan. From 1627 to 1636, Joseon was simultaneously engaged in diplomatic and trade relations with Ming, the Manchus, and Japan, functioning as a de facto hub to connect them all. Joseon capitalized on its geopolitical status to gain substantial economic profit. To understand East Asian international trade centered on the Ming in the first half of the 17th century, it is necessary to look not only at maritime trade in the coastal areas of southeastern China, but also at the trade between the Ming, Joseon, the Manchus, and Japan, with Joseon as the hub.

참고문헌 (71)

  1. "광해군일기", ~
  2. "인조실록", ~
  3. "승정원일기", ~
  4. "비변사등록", ~
  5. "邊例集要", ~
  6. "受敎謄錄", ~
  7. "訓局謄錄", ~
  8. "迎接都監應辦色儀軌(奎14561)", ~
  9. "청태종실록", ~
  10. "崇禎長編", ~
  11. "明淸史料", ~
  12. "滿文老檔", ~
  13. "內國史院檔", ~
  14. "朝鮮國來書簿", ~
  15. "東江疏揭塘報節抄", ~
  16. 金坽, "溪巖日錄", ~
  17. 金奉祖, "鹤湖集", ~
  18. 金堉, "潛谷遺稿", ~
  19. 宣若海, "水使公入使瀋陽日記", ~
  20. 申悅道, "懶齋集", ~
  21. 魏廷喆, "瀋陽往還日記", ~
  22. 李晩榮, "雪海遺稿", ~
  23. 李民宬, "敬亭集", ~
  24. 李民寏, "紫巖集", ~
  25. 李浚, "歸來亭遺稿", ~
  26. 李忔, "朝天日記(本草)", ~
  27. 張維, "谿谷集", ~
  28. 全湜, "沙西集", ~
  29. 鄭泰齊, "鄭泰齊史草", ~
  30. 鄭弘溟, "翰院草記", ~
  31. 趙慶男, "續雜錄", ~
  32. 趙戢, "燕行錄", ~
  33. 崔晛, "訒齋集", ~
  34. 洪翼漢, "朝天航海錄", ~
  35. 洪鎬, "無住逸稿", ~
  36. 郭之奇, "宛在堂文集", ~
  37. 談遷, "國榷", ~
  38. 楊嗣昌, "楊文弱先生集", ~
  39. 陳子壯, "禮部存稿", ~
  40. 구도영, "16세기 한중무역 연구 : 혼돈의 동아시아, 예의의 나라 조선의 대명무역" (2018), 태학사
  41. 국립해양문화재연구소, "전통선박 조선기술Ⅵ : 조운선" (2012), 국립해양문화재연구소
  42. 국립해양문화재연구소, "전통선박 조선기술Ⅵ : 조선통신사 정사기선" (2019), 국립해양문화재연구소
  43. 안드레 군더 프랑크, "리오리엔트" (2003), 이산
  44. 유소맹, "여진 부락에서 만주 국가로" (2013), 푸른역사
  45. 유승주, "조선후기 중국과의 무역사" (2002), 경인문화사
  46. 한명기, "임진왜란과 한중관계" (1999), 역사비평사
  47. 鈴木開, "明淸交替と朝鮮外交" (2021), 刀水書房
  48. 辻大和, "朝鮮王朝の對中貿易政策と明淸交替" (2018), 汲古書院
  49. 田代和生, "近世日朝通交貿易史の硏究" (1981), 創文社
  50. Cheng Wei-chung, War, "Trade and Piracy in the China Seas 1622-1683" (2013), Brill
  51. 구범진, "병자호란 전야 외교 접촉의 실상과 청의 기만 작전, 그리고 『청태종실록』의 기록 조작", 동양사학연구, (150), pp.253~298 (2020), 동양사학회[DOI]
  52. 권내현, "17세기 전반 平安道의 軍糧 운영", 조선시대사학보, (20), pp.169~196 (2002), 조선시대사학회
  53. 권내현, "17세기 후반~18세기 전반 조선의 은 유통", 역사학보, (221), pp.3~31 (2014), 역사학회
  54. 金英淑, "明末의 中國社會와 朝鮮使臣의 外交活動: 金堉의 『朝京日錄』과 『朝天錄』의 분석을 중심으로", 明淸史硏究, 31 (2009)
  55. 서원익, "明淸交替期 東江鎭의 위상과 경제적 기반", 명청사연구, (53), pp.97~139 (2020), 명청사학회[DOI]
  56. 스즈키 카이, "劉興治와 朝鮮과의 관계에 대하여", 만주연구, 19 (2015)
  57. 이재경, "선조 말~광해군대 대명무역의 전개", 진단학보, (139), pp.1~37 (2022), 진단학회
  58. 이재경, "조선시대 명 사신에 대한 외교경비 연구", 박사, 국사학과, pp.2022
  59. 李賢淑, "16~17世紀 朝鮮의 對中國 輸出政策에 관한 연구", 弘益史學, 6 (1996)
  60. 李賢淑, "왜란 호란 시기 조선의 對中國 輸入政策에 대한 연구", 白山學報, 68 (2004)
  61. 임경준, "壬辰戰爭과 靑布・藍布—明軍이 朝鮮에 가져 온 중국산 면포", 중국학보, (101), pp.427~453 (2022), 한국중국학회[DOI]
  62. 鄭炳喆, "明末 遼東 沿海 일대의 ‘海上勢力’", 明淸史硏究, 23 (2005)
  63. 韓明基, "17세기 초 銀의 유통과 그 영향", 奎章閣, 15 (1992)
  64. 韓相權, "金哲埈博士華甲紀念史學論叢" (1983), 지식산업사
  65. 邱仲麟, "明代的藥材流通與藥品價格", 中國社會歷史評論, 1 (2008)
  66. 張存武, "淸入關前與朝鮮的貿易: 1627~1636", 東方學志, 21 (1979)
  67. 鈴木開, "1621年の進香使李必榮一行の遭難: 蔵書閣所蔵『吏文謄錄』所収文書の一斑", 明大アジア史論集, 23 (2019)
  68. 山本進, "近世中朝貿易と青布", 朝鮮學報, 234 (2015)
  69. 徐仁範, "海域世界の環境と文化" (2011), 汲古書院
  70. 田川孝三, "毛文龍と朝鮮との關係について", 靑邱說叢, 3 (1932)
  71. 岩井茂樹, "明末淸初の社會と文化" (1996), 京都大學人文科學硏究所

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)