본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

명대의 精微批文

Jingweipi Documents in Ming Dynasty

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

In this paper, a format of the Ming Dynasty official documents - Jingweipi(精微批) - was explored to delve into the functional situation of Nanjing southern capital. As a type of approval document, pi(批), Jingweipi was used when sending officials from higher-level institutions to outer skirts, and includes information such as the official's identity, official mission, and the validity period of the official document. Precision approval has been added and printed with precision by the Imperial Inner Office, and has higher requirements than other documents were required. This study indicate that during the Ming Dynasty, officials from both the northern and southern capitals generally used this Jingweipi documents when dispatched to other districts. This article explores the advantages and weaknesses of the Ming Dynasty's Jingweipi, and explains why the Ming Dynasty required Nanjing officials to use Jingweipi, as well as the reasons why Ming officials were unwilling to use.

Abstract

In this paper, a format of the Ming Dynasty official documents - Jingweipi(精微批) - was explored to delve into the functional situation of Nanjing southern capital. As a type of approval document, pi(批), Jingweipi was used when sending officials from higher-level institutions to outer skirts, and includes information such as the official's identity, official mission, and the validity period of the official document. Precision approval has been added and printed with precision by the Imperial Inner Office, and has higher requirements than other documents were required. This study indicate that during the Ming Dynasty, officials from both the northern and southern capitals generally used this Jingweipi documents when dispatched to other districts. This article explores the advantages and weaknesses of the Ming Dynasty's Jingweipi, and explains why the Ming Dynasty required Nanjing officials to use Jingweipi, as well as the reasons why Ming officials were unwilling to use.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. "明史" (1974), 中華書局
  2. "明實錄" (1962), 臺灣中央硏究院歷史語言硏究所
  3. "明會要" (1956), 中華書局
  4. "續修四庫全書 748책" (2002), 上海古籍出版社
  5. "叢書集成續編" (1988), 新文豐出版公司
  6. "續修四庫全書" (2002), 上海古籍出版社
  7. 古代漢語詞典編寫組, "古代漢語詞典" (2002), 商務印書館
  8. "孔子博物館藏孔府檔案彙編" (2018), 國家圖書館出版社
  9. 顧養謙, "四庫全書存目叢書 史部62책" (1997), 齊魯書社
  10. 祁彪佳, "續修四庫全書 492책" (1995), 上海古籍出版社
  11. 南炳文, "輯校萬曆起居注" (2010), 天津古籍出版社
  12. 戴金, "中國珍稀法律典籍集成" (1994), 中國社會科學出版社
  13. 陶尙德, "南京刑部志", 미국의회도서관소장, ~
  14. 柳瑛, "中都志" (1990), 上海書店
  15. 李淸, "三垣筆記" (1982), 中華書局
  16. 潘季馴, "文淵閣四庫全書 史部334책" (1983), 台灣商務印書館
  17. 謝彬, "南京戶部志", 미국시카고대학도서관 소장, ~
  18. 徐元瑞, "吏學指南" (2012), 社會科學文獻出版社
  19. 施沛, "四庫全書存目叢書補編" (1996)
  20. 倪凍, "續修四庫全書 878책" (1995), 上海古籍出版社
  21. 王鏊, "文淵閣四庫全書 集部195책" (1987), 台灣商務印書館
  22. 王樵, "文淵閣四庫全書』集部224책" (1986), 灣商務印書館
  23. 張良知, "中都儲志", 미국의회도서관소장본, ~
  24. 嵆曾筠, "中國地方志集成 浙江5" (2006), 巴蜀書社
  25. 胡丹, "明代宦官史料長編" (2014), 鳳凰出版社
  26. 黃佐, "文淵閣四庫全書 史部354책" (1987), 台灣商務印書館
  27. 橋本雄, "古文書料紙論叢" (2017), 勉誠出版
  28. 呂宗力, "中國歷代官制大辭典" (2015), 商務印書館
  29. 劉錚雲, "尋找大淸"精微批文"", 古今論衡, 16 (2007)
  30. 裴燕生, "歷史文書" (2009), 中國人民大學出版社
  31. 徐望之, "公牘通論" (1988), 檔案出版社
  32. 伍躍, "日明関係における「勘合」の形状についての新知見", 史林, 103 (2020)
  33. 伍躍, "關於明代勘合形制的再探討", 史學集刊, (2) (2021)
  34. 張紀偉, "明代的關防", 歷史檔案, (1) (2016)
  35. 張金奎, "明代的駕帖與精微批", 社會科學輯刊, (4) (2017)
  36. 陳鑫, "「明代勘合的概念與形態述略", 浙江師範大學學報(社會科學版), (47) (2022)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)