현대어 ‘사과’의 통시적 혼란상과 정착과정
Diachronic Confusing Meaning and Settlement Process of the Present Korean ‘사과(apple)’
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the middle and modern Korean, ‘멎/벚/봋’ are constituted synonyms in current dictionaries. But they are separate words with different meaning in the middle and modern Korean. Nevertheless, incorrect information of botanical and linguistic skills is reflected in the pre. ‘멎/벚/봋’ are identified that might be mixed on same meaning in the middle and modern Korean. What '柰' is corresponded to the '멎' is of course, but has been used incorrectly to '벚'. '柰' and ‘林檎/楂果’ are synonyms on the meaning 'apple'. This '柰' is usually responses to '멎'. '奈' corresponding to '멎' was changed 사과(apple) after 「해동농서」. On the 「산림경제」, 「증보산림경제」, 「고사신서」, 「색경증집」, 「농정회요」, this is mentioned ‘楂果’ or ‘査果’. On the 「농정회요」, this is mentioned ‘蘋果’ but this is a ‘楂果’ too. On the 「해동농서」, '柰' is referred to the '頻婆'. But the fruits are similar to '林檎', greater than '林檎'. This means '柰=蘋婆' and then '柰(蘋婆)>林檎' as in size. '頻婆' belongs to '蘋果(俗名楂果)', these differences are in size. '頻婆' is largier than '林檎', '林檎' is largier than 柰..
Abstract
In the middle and modern Korean, ‘멎/벚/봋’ are constituted synonyms in current dictionaries. But they are separate words with different meaning in the middle and modern Korean. Nevertheless, incorrect information of botanical and linguistic skills is reflected in the pre. ‘멎/벚/봋’ are identified that might be mixed on same meaning in the middle and modern Korean. What '柰' is corresponded to the '멎' is of course, but has been used incorrectly to '벚'. '柰' and ‘林檎/楂果’ are synonyms on the meaning 'apple'. This '柰' is usually responses to '멎'. '奈' corresponding to '멎' was changed 사과(apple) after 「해동농서」. On the 「산림경제」, 「증보산림경제」, 「고사신서」, 「색경증집」, 「농정회요」, this is mentioned ‘楂果’ or ‘査果’. On the 「농정회요」, this is mentioned ‘蘋果’ but this is a ‘楂果’ too. On the 「해동농서」, '柰' is referred to the '頻婆'. But the fruits are similar to '林檎', greater than '林檎'. This means '柰=蘋婆' and then '柰(蘋婆)>林檎' as in size. '頻婆' belongs to '蘋果(俗名楂果)', these differences are in size. '頻婆' is largier than '林檎', '林檎' is largier than 柰..
참고문헌 (21)
- 국립국어원, "표준국어대사전" (2000)
- 국중성, "사과와 林檎, 상서", pp.168~171 (1986), 한국장서가회
- 農林水産 古文獻 備要, "김영진", 韓國農村經濟硏究院., ~ (1982)
- 김영진, "조선시대 농업과학기술사" (2000), 서울대학교출판부
- 김완진, "q사과와 林檎, 그리고 ‘멎’", 국어학, 40, pp.1~19 (2002), 국어학회
- 김종하, "신주해 본초강목 제8권 菜果部" (2007), 여일출판사
- 남광우, "고어사전" (1981), 일조각
- 농서, "한국근세사회경제사료총서", pp.1~36 (1981), 아세아문화사
- 색경증집, "諸橋轍次", 장서각소장본, ~
- 손병태, "식물성 향약명 어휘 연구", 한민족어문학, 30, pp.105~191 (1997), 한민족어문학회
- 안명철, "‘벚나무’와 ‘봇나무’", 인문연구, 30, pp.71~81 (1999), 인하대인문과학연구소
- 여찬영, "식물명칭어 연구", 한국전통문화연구, 7, pp.11~33 (1991), 대가대 인문과학연구소
- 연변인민출판사, "조선말사전 1～3권" (1995), 연변인민출판사
- 유창돈, "이조어사전" (1985), 연세대출판부
- 이광호, "전래 농서에서의 채과류 분류와 명칭의 혼란", 어문학, (111), pp.89~113 (2011), 한국어문학회
- 이광호, "전래 농서의 果樹類 분류와 相異 명칭", 우리말글, 51, pp.95~116 (2011), 우리말글학회
- 이광호, "중, 근세국어 ‘멎", 벚, 어문학, pp.2011, (114)[DOI]
- 이기문, "훈몽자회 연구" (1983), 서울대출판부
- 이성우, "한국식경대전" (1998), 향문사
- 한국불교대사전편찬위원회, "한국불교대사전" (1982), 한국불교대사전편찬위원회
- 홍사만, "국어 의미 분석론" (2007), 한국문화사