Н. 디야코노프의 스탈린상 수상 희극 『결혼지참금』연구 : 제2차 세계대전 후 소련 희극의 문제
A Study on N. Diyakonov’s ‘Stalin Prize’-Winning Comedy Marriage with Dowry : Problem of Soviet Comedy after World War II
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper is devoted to study N. Dyakovs’s play 『Wedding with a Dowry』; the comedy is analyzed in terms of conflict and competition, satire and criticism, entertainment and education, what should explain compromise and tension between the contemporary theater policy and the Soviet comedy. In the 『Wedding with a Dowry』, Olga and Maxim's strife is different from the traditional conflict of the drama; while they have a common goal of improving agricultural productivity and achieving production goals, the enthusiastic heros of comedy, who have strong competition spirit, own different views on how to achieve the goal: The conflict of comedy is replaced by socialist competition between two young activist leaders of collective farms. As a result, 『Wedding with a Dowry』 became a comedy of conflict-free. Since 1945, satire has become virtually impossible in Soviet theater, and the criticism overwhelms satire instead. Criticism and self-criticism were the means for evaluating social practice and overcoming individual errors and deficiencies. In the ‘Zdanovshchina’s period of Soviet literature, criticism and self-criticism had to become the principle of dramaturgy, what resulted in anomalous changes and modifications not only in the content of the Soviet comedy but also in the form: The process of <error-criticism-self criticism-rebirth> became a structural feature of the comedy plot and the laughter of comedy has weakened. When Diyakonov was writing the comedy 『Wedding with a Dowry』, he should consider the drama policy demands to deal with the modern themes of the Soviet Union and the characteristics of the comedy genre, which should provide laughter and entertainment. In his comedy, education is centered around the modern theme of agriculture; on the other hand, the comic situation is minimized. Kurotskin, who plays a central role in singing, dancing, and music, is also the object of character comic of the comedy; the proposal scene for Maksim produces the comic effect. Education and entertainment, which are integrated in the ending wedding scenes, should create the effect of emotion among the audience. But the truth of the impression of the ending is doubtful. Because emotion contributes to beautifying and varnishing of reality of the Soviet Union.
Abstract
This paper is devoted to study N. Dyakovs’s play 『Wedding with a Dowry』; the comedy is analyzed in terms of conflict and competition, satire and criticism, entertainment and education, what should explain compromise and tension between the contemporary theater policy and the Soviet comedy. In the 『Wedding with a Dowry』, Olga and Maxim's strife is different from the traditional conflict of the drama; while they have a common goal of improving agricultural productivity and achieving production goals, the enthusiastic heros of comedy, who have strong competition spirit, own different views on how to achieve the goal: The conflict of comedy is replaced by socialist competition between two young activist leaders of collective farms. As a result, 『Wedding with a Dowry』 became a comedy of conflict-free. Since 1945, satire has become virtually impossible in Soviet theater, and the criticism overwhelms satire instead. Criticism and self-criticism were the means for evaluating social practice and overcoming individual errors and deficiencies. In the ‘Zdanovshchina’s period of Soviet literature, criticism and self-criticism had to become the principle of dramaturgy, what resulted in anomalous changes and modifications not only in the content of the Soviet comedy but also in the form: The process of <error-criticism-self criticism-rebirth> became a structural feature of the comedy plot and the laughter of comedy has weakened. When Diyakonov was writing the comedy 『Wedding with a Dowry』, he should consider the drama policy demands to deal with the modern themes of the Soviet Union and the characteristics of the comedy genre, which should provide laughter and entertainment. In his comedy, education is centered around the modern theme of agriculture; on the other hand, the comic situation is minimized. Kurotskin, who plays a central role in singing, dancing, and music, is also the object of character comic of the comedy; the proposal scene for Maksim produces the comic effect. Education and entertainment, which are integrated in the ending wedding scenes, should create the effect of emotion among the audience. But the truth of the impression of the ending is doubtful. Because emotion contributes to beautifying and varnishing of reality of the Soviet Union.
참고문헌 (37)
- 백용식, "웃음과 희극의 구조", 러시아어문학연구논집 별쇄본, (5), pp.140~ (1999)
- 백용식, "고전 러시아 보드빌의 시학", 슬라브학보, 14(2), pp.103~129 (1999)
- 백용식, "2차 세계대전 후 소련의 문학정책-1946년 8월 14일의 중앙위원회의 결정과 조시첸코의 동화 <원숭이의 모험>", 러시아학, 5, pp.45~65 (2009)
- 백용식, "Н. 고골의 희극 『검찰관』의 슈제트 연구", 러시아어문학연구논집, (43), pp.89~115 (2013), 한국러시아문학회[DOI]
- 송준서, "전후 스탈린 시기 사회주의적 경쟁의 퇴조와 ‘대협약’의 성립, 1944-1953", 슬라브학보, 24(1), pp.213~242 (2009), 한국슬라브․유라시아학회
- "표준국어대사전"[URL]
- 프라이, N., "비평의 해부" (2011), 한길사
- Акимов, Н., "Не только о театре", pp.201~204 (1966), Искусство
- Граков, Г., "Рецидивы формализма, О гастролях Ленинградского театракомедии в Москве", Правда, pp.3~ (1949)
- Дьяконов, Н., "Пьесы советских писателейтом 11", pp.125~181 (1956), Искусство
- Залесский, В., "На ложном пути, Заметки о Ленинградском театрекомедии", Театр, 8, pp.40~49 (1949)
- "вопросы оргбюро исекретариата ЦК ВКП(б)”: об учреждении газеты агитпропа ЦК" (1946)[URL]
- Калашников, Ю., "О современном советском репертуаре", Театр, 11, pp.3~11 (1946)
- Калитин, П., "Действенное оружие", Театр, 9, pp.30~36 (1948)
- "Краткая литературная Энциклопедия" (1962), Сов. энциклопедия
- "О журналах <<Звезда>> и <<Ленинград>>. Из постановления ЦКВКП(б) от 14 августа 1946 г", Новый мир, 23, pp.3~6 (1946)
- "О Ленинградском Театре комедии, В Комитете по делам искусств", Современное искусство, pp.4~ (1949)
- "О репертуаре драматических театров и мерах по его улучшению. Постановление ЦК ВКП(б) от 26 авкуста 1946 г", Театр, (7-8), pp.6~10 (1946)
- Осипов, Г., "Чистая комедийность-разновидность формализма и естетика, ответы на вопросы читателей", Советское искусство, pp.4~ (1949)
- "Покончить со всеми проявлениями реакционно-буржуазной идеологиикосмополитизма!", Театр, 2, pp.3~5 (1949)
- "Преодолевать отставание драматургии", Правда (1952)
- Ромашов, В., "Расчистить дорогу передовой драматургии", Театр, (2), pp.6~12 (1949)
- Рудницкий, К., "Пороки трех комедий", Театр, (7-8), pp.21~24 (1946)
- Солодовников, А., "Московские премьеры(<Свадьба с приданым> вТеатре сатиры)", Театр, 5, pp.15~22 (1950)
- Театральный дневник, "Театральный дневник, Конкурс на лучшую советскую комедию", Театр, 4, pp.74~75 (1949)
- "Философский энциклопедический словарь" (1989), Советскаяэнциклопедия
- Фролов, В., "О путях развития советской комедии", Театр, 4, pp.39~48 (1949)
- Фролов, В., "Общественное назначение Театра сатиры", Театр, 1, pp.24~30 (1950)
- Храпченко, М., "Постановление ЦК ВКП(б) - программа всей нашейработы", Театр, 9, pp.26~32 (1946)
- Шнер, А.Я., "Театральная энциклопедия. т.1", pp.981~985 (1967), Советская энциклопедия
- Gaier, U. Satire, "Satire, Studien zu Neidhart, Witternwiler, Brandt und zur satirischen Schreibart" (1967), Walter de Gruyter
- Platz-Waury, E., "E. Drama und Theater, Eine Einführung" (1992), Gunter Narr Verlag
- Rauch, G., "Geschichte der Sowjetunion" (1990), Kröner
- Rudnitskii, K., "Meyerchold, the director" (1981), Ardis
- Stierle, K., "Das Komische", pp.237~268 (1976), Fink
- Struve, G., "Geschichte der Sowjetliteratur" (1957), Isar-Verl
- Warning, R., "Das Komische", pp.279~334 (1976), Wilhelm Fink Verlag