거절의 완화 전략: 공손성과 체면을 중심으로
Hedging Strategies of Refusal Speech Acts in Russian: Focusing on Politeness and Face
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this study, we considered the hedges of rejection to preserve politeness and face in communication. Politeness and face can function as a discourse strategy for smooth communication. In addition, hedges can be used as a device to minimize conflict among participants in conversation while maintaining the intention of speech in the discourse. When rejecting the other party's proposal, etc., the participant in the conversation maintains politeness, and hedges can be used to lead the conversation in a manner that minimizes damage to the face of the speaker and the other party. This study analyzed the hedges of rejection in the dialogue act of rejection through Russian example sentences. These hedging strategy are largely ‘Reservation’, ‘Sympathy and concern’, ‘Evasion’, ‘Guess’. All four strategies were marked in terms of politeness and the speaker's own face. In terms of the conversation partner's face, the strategy of ‘Reservation’ and ‘Sympathy and concern’ maintained the face, while in the case of ‘Evasion’ and ‘Guess’, it could be judged that there was a loss of face. The degree of politeness and face maintenance could also be considered. In terms of the degree of politeness, it was concluded that the degree of politeness was higher in ‘Reservation’, ‘Sympathy and concern’ and ‘Guess’ than ‘Evasion’. In terms of the speaker's own face maintenance, it could be seen that the degree of face maintenance was similar for all. ‘Reservation’, ‘Sympathy and concern’ could be seen as strategies to minimize the conversation partner's face loss rather than ‘Evasion’ and ‘Guess’.
Abstract
In this study, we considered the hedges of rejection to preserve politeness and face in communication. Politeness and face can function as a discourse strategy for smooth communication. In addition, hedges can be used as a device to minimize conflict among participants in conversation while maintaining the intention of speech in the discourse. When rejecting the other party's proposal, etc., the participant in the conversation maintains politeness, and hedges can be used to lead the conversation in a manner that minimizes damage to the face of the speaker and the other party. This study analyzed the hedges of rejection in the dialogue act of rejection through Russian example sentences. These hedging strategy are largely ‘Reservation’, ‘Sympathy and concern’, ‘Evasion’, ‘Guess’. All four strategies were marked in terms of politeness and the speaker's own face. In terms of the conversation partner's face, the strategy of ‘Reservation’ and ‘Sympathy and concern’ maintained the face, while in the case of ‘Evasion’ and ‘Guess’, it could be judged that there was a loss of face. The degree of politeness and face maintenance could also be considered. In terms of the degree of politeness, it was concluded that the degree of politeness was higher in ‘Reservation’, ‘Sympathy and concern’ and ‘Guess’ than ‘Evasion’. In terms of the speaker's own face maintenance, it could be seen that the degree of face maintenance was similar for all. ‘Reservation’, ‘Sympathy and concern’ could be seen as strategies to minimize the conversation partner's face loss rather than ‘Evasion’ and ‘Guess’.
참고문헌 (21)
- 김영아, "영어 부사 완화 표지와 한국어 종결 표현 -영어권 한국어 학습자를 위한 문법 설명-", 한국어교육, 26(1), pp.1~29 (2015), 국제한국어교육학회[DOI]
- 김정일, "러시아어의 완충장치에 대하여", 노어노문학, 22(3), pp.3~23 (2010), 한국노어노문학회
- 박상수, "영어 서법조동사가 나타내는 인식완화 서법표현", 현대문법연구, (75), pp.195~214 (2013), 현대문법학회[DOI]
- 이상임, "한·영 드라마에 나타난 헤지(hedges) 표현 연구", 인문학논총, 36, pp.175~204 (2014), 인문과학연구소
- "Другие"[URL]
- Brown, P., "Politeness : Some Universals in Language Usage" (1987), Cambridge University Press
- Fraser, B., "Speech Acts", pp.187~210 (1975), Brill
- Goffman, E., "On Face-Work", Psychiatry, 18(3), pp.213~231 (1955)
- Hubler, A., "Understatements and Hedges in English. Pragmatics &beyond"
- Johnson, D. I., "Modal Expressions in Refusals of Friends' Interpersonal Requests: Politeness and Effectiveness", Communication Studies, 59(2), pp.148~163 (2008)
- Kranich, S., "To Hedge or not to Hedge: the Use of Epistemic Modal Expressions in Popular Science in English Texts, English–German Translations, and German Original Texts", Text & Talk, 31(1), pp.77~99 (2011)
- Lakoff, G., "Hedges: A Study In Meaning Criteria And The Logic Of Fuzzy Concepts", Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2, pp.458~508 (1973)
- Leech, G. N., "Principles of Pragmatics" (1983), Longman
- Locher, M. A., "Impoliteness in Language: Studies on Its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice" (2008), Mouton de Gruyter
- Nelson, G. L., "Directness vs. Indirectness: Egyptian Arabic and US English Communication Style", International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 26, pp.39~57 (2002)
- Pekarek, D. S., "More than an Epistemic Hedge: French je sais pas ‘I don’t know’ as a Resource for the Sequential Organization of Turns and Actions", Journal of pragmatics, 106, pp.148~162 (2016)
- Prince, E., "Linguistics and the Professions" (1982), Ablex
- Siebold, K., "(No) Need for Clarity -- Facework in Spanish and German Refusals", Journal of Pragmatics, 75, pp.53~68 (2015)
- Turnbull, W., "Modal Expressions as Facework in Refusals to Comply with Requests: I Think I Should Say ‘No’ Right Now", Journal of Pragmatics, 27(2), pp.145~181 (1997)
- Wang, Q., "A Comparative Study of Gender Differences in Refusal Strategies from English Majors", Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9(8), pp.1040~1048 (2019)
- Weatherall, A., "I Don’t Know as a Prepositioned Epistemic Hedge", Research on Language and Social Interaction, 44(4), pp.317~337 (2011)