The Function of the Suffix -na in Khalkha Mongolian
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper discusses the function of the Khalkha Mongolian suffix -na. While it has been described as referring to future, present, and timeless situations, how it is used has not yet been specified. This paper is an attempt to shed some light on this, taking into account factors such as aspect oppositions, aktionsart-independent (i.e. generic) uses, text-specific uses, interaction with aktionsart, and age of speaker. Finally, -na is understood to be a bleached imperfective marker that has lost its ability to relate to a specific point in time and is, instead, in the process of acquiring modal connotations.
Abstract
This paper discusses the function of the Khalkha Mongolian suffix -na. While it has been described as referring to future, present, and timeless situations, how it is used has not yet been specified. This paper is an attempt to shed some light on this, taking into account factors such as aspect oppositions, aktionsart-independent (i.e. generic) uses, text-specific uses, interaction with aktionsart, and age of speaker. Finally, -na is understood to be a bleached imperfective marker that has lost its ability to relate to a specific point in time and is, instead, in the process of acquiring modal connotations.
참고문헌 (23)
- Aikhenvald,Alexandra Yurievna, "Evidentiality" (2004), Oxford University Press
- Breu,Walter, "Komponentenmodell der Interaktion von Lexik und Aspekt In: Slavistische Linguistik 1995", pp.37~74 (1996), Otto Sagner
- Bjambasan, P., "Üjl ügijn todotgon holboh nöhcöl In: Bjambasan et al.,Orčin cagijn mongol helnij üg züjn bajguulalt", pp.86~108 (1987), Šinžleh uhaany akadjemi
- Bjambasan, P., "Üjl ügijn cagaar tögsgöh nöhcöl In: Bjambasan et al.,Orčin cagijn mongol helnij üg züjn bajguulalt", pp.158~174 (1987), Šinžleh uhaany akadjemi
- Brosig,Benjamin, "Die satzfiniten Aspektmarker des modernen Khalkha-Mongolischen", 석사, pp.2009
- Bybee, J. L., "The evolution of grammar:Tense,aspect and modality in the languages of the world,University of Chicago" (1994), Chicago
- Chuluu,Üjeyidiin, "Mongolian past tense markers and their usage", Mongolian studies, XVIII, pp.85~112 (1995), Mongolia society
- Činggeltei, "Mongγul kelen-ü tusalaqu üile üge-yin tuqai In: Öbür mongγul-un yeke surγaγuli", pp.1~103 (1959), Öbür mongγul-un yeke surγaγuli
- Činggeltei, "Odu üye-yin mongγul kelen-ü jüi" (1999), Öbür mongγul-un arad-un keblel-ün qoriy-a
- Ebert, Karen H., "Degrees of focality in Kalmyk imperfectives In: Tense-aspect,transitivity and causativity", pp.323~339 (1999), John Benjamins
- Hashimoto,Kunihiko, "Shūkansō", Muroran kōgyō daigaku kenkyū hōkoku (bunrihen), 45, pp.35~67 (1995), Muroran kōgyō daigaku.
- Hashimoto,Kunihiko, "Mongorugo no kopyura kōbun no imi no ruikei", Muroran kōgyō daigaku kiyō, 54, pp.91~100 (2004), Muroran kōgyō daigaku.
- Johanson,Lars, "Aspekt im Türkischen" (1971), Berlingska Boktryckeriet
- Johanson,Lars, "Viewpoint operators in European languages In: Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe", pp.27~187 (2000), Mouton de Gruyter
- Kalchofner,Peter, "Die Leistung der Indikativformen im Khalkha-Mongolischen", Zentralasiatische Studien, 29, pp.169~199 (1999), Zentralasiatisches Seminar,Universität Bonn.
- Kim,Gi-Song, "Orčin cagijn mongol helnij üjl ügijn engijn cag In: tüünij togtolcoo" (1995), s.n.
- Matsuoka,Yūta, "Mongorugo no asupekuto ni kan suru kenkyū(unpublished dissertation)", pp.2008
- Smith,Carlota, "The Parameter of Aspect" (1991), Kluwer
- Song,Jae-Mog, "Tense,aspect and modality in Khalkha Mongolian", 박사, pp.1997
- Street,John, "Khalkha structure" (1963), Indiana University Press
- Svantesson,Jan-Olof, "Tense,mood and aspect in Mongolian", Working papers, 38, pp.189~204 (1991), Department of linguistics,Lund University.
- Umetani,Hiroyuki, "bajna In: -yn nijlmel üjl ögüülehüünij tuslah üjl ügeer orson heregleeg busad heregleenüüdtej har’cuulan sudlah n' In: Paper presented at the Olon ulsyn mongolč erdemtnij IX hural" (2006)
- Vendler,Zeno, "Verbs and Times", Philosophical Review, 66, pp.143~160 (1957), Sage School of Philosophy,Cornell University.