Unknown treasures hidden in lines of Mongolian Buddhist literature: In the case of Mongolian versions of the Lotus Sutra
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Lotus Sutra, of which five Mongolian texts are available at present, is believed to have been firstly translated from Tibetan into Mongolian in the Middle period, although the original translation is missing. The oldest of the five, a Beijing xylograph printed in the 17th century, is a revision by Erdeni mergen dayicing tayiji based on the original by Chos-kyi ‘od zer of the 14th century, as far as we believe the contents of its colophon. Careful comparison among the lines of those five, however, tells us that the colophon is not true at all. Moreover we can find many precious facts about Mongolian philology and historical linguistics in the lines of the Mongolian versions of the Lotus Sutra. This work is a typical case in which we find not only many mysterious facts about the compilation of Mongolian Buddhist works but also critical cues to solve the mysteries
Abstract
The Lotus Sutra, of which five Mongolian texts are available at present, is believed to have been firstly translated from Tibetan into Mongolian in the Middle period, although the original translation is missing. The oldest of the five, a Beijing xylograph printed in the 17th century, is a revision by Erdeni mergen dayicing tayiji based on the original by Chos-kyi ‘od zer of the 14th century, as far as we believe the contents of its colophon. Careful comparison among the lines of those five, however, tells us that the colophon is not true at all. Moreover we can find many precious facts about Mongolian philology and historical linguistics in the lines of the Mongolian versions of the Lotus Sutra. This work is a typical case in which we find not only many mysterious facts about the compilation of Mongolian Buddhist works but also critical cues to solve the mysteries
참고문헌 (16)
- Aalto,Pentti, "A catalogue of the Hedin Collection of Mongolian literature. In Contributions to ethnography, linguistics and history of religions", pp.67~103 (1954), dish Ethnographical Museum
- Heissig,Walther, "Die Pekinger lamaistischen Blockdrucke in mongolischer Sprache" (1954), Otto Harrassowitz
- Heissig,Walther, "Beiträge zur Übersetzungsgeschichte des mongolischen buddhistischen Kanons" (1962), Otto Harrassowitz
- Heissig, Walther, "Catalogue of Mongol books, manuscripts and xylographs" (1971), The Royal Library
- Higuchi,Koichi, (1991), Keisuisha. Cf. 蒙古語訳『宝徳蔵般若経』の研究
- Higuchi,Koichi, (1994), Taga Press. Cf. 蒙古語訳『宝網経』の研究
- Higuchi,Koichi, "Mongolian versions of the Saddharmapuṇḍarīka from the linguistic and philological viewpoint", Zentralasiatische Studien, 27, pp.21~48 (1996), Otto Harrassowitz
- Higuchi,Koichi, (1998), Taga Press. Cf. 蒙古語訳『牛首山授記経』の研究
- Kern, Hendrik, "Saddharmapuṇḍarīka. St" (1910), Bibliotheca Buddhica X. St.-Pétersbourg Académic Impériale des Science
- Ligeti, Louis, "Catalogue du kanǰur mongol imprimeé" (1944), Akademiai Kiado
- Poppe,Nicholas, "Introduction to Mongolian comparative studies" (1955), Suomalaris-Ugrilainen Seura
- Poppe,Nicholas, "Catalogue of the Manchu-Mongol section of the Toyo Bunko" (1964), Toyo Bunko
- Suzuki,Daisetu, "Eiin Pekinban Chibetto daizoukyou ― Otani Daigaku Toshokanzou. The Tibetan Tripiṭaka, Peking Edition ― kept in the Library of the Otani University" (1961), Tibetan Tripitaka Research Institute
- Takakusu, Junjiro, "Taishou shinshuu daizoukyou soumokuroku. [A catalogue of the Taisho Tripiṭaka" (1934), Taishou Issaikyou Kankoukai
- Tohoku Imperial University, (1934), Tohoku Imperial University. (abbr. as Tohoku) Cf. 西藏大藏經總目録
- Wogihara,Unrai, "Saddharmapuṇḍarīka-sūtram bonbun hokekyō: romanized and revised text of the Bibliotheca Buddhica publication by consulting a Skt. ms." (1935), Seigo- Kenkyūkai