On impersonal constructions in Uyghur and Mongolian
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
It is a well-known fact that most Altaic languages display similar sentence structure and word order. However if we drill further into the deeper structures of these languages, we can figure out some peculiar features which are sui generis. Impersonal constructions are many varieties of types, such as agentless gerunds, agentless passives, existential sentences, and modal sentences etc. Since most Turkic languages are pro-drop in nature, omitting the pronominal subject also helps to form impersonal constructions. Contrarily, most Mongolic languages are non- pro-drop and lack enclitic negative marker as -mA (-ma/-mä). As a result, different methods are used to form affirmative or negative impersonal constructions in Mongolic and Manchu-Tungusic languages. This paper will compare the structure of impersonal constructions in these languages. Here I shall limit my discussion to Uyghur and Mongolian language facts.
Abstract
It is a well-known fact that most Altaic languages display similar sentence structure and word order. However if we drill further into the deeper structures of these languages, we can figure out some peculiar features which are sui generis. Impersonal constructions are many varieties of types, such as agentless gerunds, agentless passives, existential sentences, and modal sentences etc. Since most Turkic languages are pro-drop in nature, omitting the pronominal subject also helps to form impersonal constructions. Contrarily, most Mongolic languages are non- pro-drop and lack enclitic negative marker as -mA (-ma/-mä). As a result, different methods are used to form affirmative or negative impersonal constructions in Mongolic and Manchu-Tungusic languages. This paper will compare the structure of impersonal constructions in these languages. Here I shall limit my discussion to Uyghur and Mongolian language facts.
참고문헌 (16)
- Abdurusul, Muzappar, "Manchu Studies 1" (2018), Heilongjiang University
- Aiken, Janet R., "The subjectless imperative", Modern Language Notes, 51(4), pp.273~274 (1936), The Johns Hopkins University Press
- Äxmät, Turdi., "Modern Uyghur grammar, A textbook for Universities" (1989), Šinjaŋ Maarip Näšriyati
- Cheng, Shiliang, "Modern Uyghur grammar" (1996), Šinjang Xälq Näšriyati
- Gaolianhua, "Mongolian verbs and syntax structure in the frame of generative grammar", PhD, pp.2007
- Gaolianhua, "Mongolian verbs and syntax structure in the frame of generative grammar" (2014), MUC Publishing House
- Langacker, Ronald W., "Passives and their meaning", Language, 51(4), pp.789~830 (1975), Linguistic Society of America
- Malchukov, Andrej, "Impersonal constructions: A crosslinguistic perspective" (2011), John Benjamins
- "."
- "Til Wä Tärjimä", 1990, 24~27, pp.ŠinjaŋXälq Näšriyati
- Qinggeertai, "A grammar of the Mongolian language" (1992), Neimenggu Renmin Chubanshe
- Säpär, Sulayman, (2000), Šinjaŋ Xälq Näšriyati
- Siewierska, Anna, "Current trends in contrastive linguistics: Fuctional and cognitive perspectives", pp.3~26 (2008), John Benjamins
- Tohti & Litip, "A new approach to Turkic studies in the frame of generative syntax", Minzu Yuwen, 2005(6), pp.35~43 (2005), Zhongguo Shehui Kexue Chubanshe
- Tömür, Hämit, "Yildiz Dil Ve Edebiyat 3" (2003)
- "Til Wä Tärjimä", 1994, 37~38