C3 식물과 CAM 식물에서 수분 스트레스의 효과
The Effects of Water Stress on C3 Plant and CAM Plant
1
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The differences of several kinds of physiological responses between Commelina communis (C3 plant) and Sedum sarmentosum (CAM plant: Crassulacean Acid metabolism) when both plants were exposed to water stress for 3 weeks were investigated. In case of Commelina it was shown a clear loss of water to 12% in three weeks, but no changes were observed in Sedum. Total chlorophyll content was also reduced to 57% in Commelina but not clear changes of chlorophyll content in Sedum. were observed for three weeks. In chlorophyll fluorescence experiments Fv/Fm ratios were reduced to 19% in Commelina, but no changes were observed in Sedum. There were very sensitive responses according to the different KCl concentrations and the stomatal aperture of epidermal strips was 12.8 μm at 200 mM KCl in Commelina, but less than 3 μm was observed at the same KCl concentration in Sedum. In addition, there were no chloroplasts in guard cells of Sedum, but most plants had chloroplasts including Commelina. From the above results, the ability of water stress resistance in Sedum. could be come from slow physiological metabolism including growth and less loss of water through unique stomatal characteristics.
Abstract
The differences of several kinds of physiological responses between Commelina communis (C3 plant) and Sedum sarmentosum (CAM plant: Crassulacean Acid metabolism) when both plants were exposed to water stress for 3 weeks were investigated. In case of Commelina it was shown a clear loss of water to 12% in three weeks, but no changes were observed in Sedum. Total chlorophyll content was also reduced to 57% in Commelina but not clear changes of chlorophyll content in Sedum. were observed for three weeks. In chlorophyll fluorescence experiments Fv/Fm ratios were reduced to 19% in Commelina, but no changes were observed in Sedum. There were very sensitive responses according to the different KCl concentrations and the stomatal aperture of epidermal strips was 12.8 μm at 200 mM KCl in Commelina, but less than 3 μm was observed at the same KCl concentration in Sedum. In addition, there were no chloroplasts in guard cells of Sedum, but most plants had chloroplasts including Commelina. From the above results, the ability of water stress resistance in Sedum. could be come from slow physiological metabolism including growth and less loss of water through unique stomatal characteristics.
참고문헌 (26)
- Adams WW, "Responses of two CAM species to different irradiances during growth and susceptibility to photoinhibition by high light", Plant Physiol, 83, pp.213~218 (1987)
- Carnal NW, "Soluble sugars as the carbohydrate reserve for CAM in pineapple leaves: Implications for the role of pyrophosphate 6-Phosphofructokinase in glycolysis", Plant Physiol, 90, pp.91~110 (1987)
- Cote FX, "CO2 and O2 exchanges in the CAM plant Ananas comosus (L.) merr: Determination of total and malate-decorbocylation- dependent CO2-assimilation rates; study of light O2-uptake", Plant Physiol, 89, pp.61~68 (1989)
- Demming B, "Comparison of the effect of excessive high of chlorophyll fluorescence (77k) and photon yield of O2 evolution in leaves of higher plants", Planta, 171, pp.171~184 (1987)
- de Jong T, "Gas exchange responses of Chesapeak Bay tidal marsh species under field and laboratory conditions", Oecologia, 52, pp.5~11 (1982)
- Edwards GE, "C3, C4: Mechanisms and cellular and Environmental Regulation of Photosynthesis", pp.653~ (1983), University of California Press
- Harris FS, "Correlation between CAM-Cycling and photosynthetic gas exchange in five species of Talinum (Portulacaceae)", Plant Physiol, 96, pp.1118~1124 (1991)
- Hasegawa S, "Classification and geological distribution of C3 and C4 plants", Journal of Agricultural Meteorology, 34, pp.195~200 (1979)
- Hattersley P, "The distribution of C3 and C4 grasses in Australia in relation to climate", Oecologia (Berlin), 57, pp.113~128 (1983)
- Holden, "Chlorophylls, In Chemistry and biochemistry of plant pigments", pp.461~488 (1965), Academic Press
- Holthe PA, "Developmental control of CAM in Peperomia scandens", Plant Physiol, 84, pp.743~747 (1987)
- Hsiao TC, "Plant responses to water deficits, efficiency and drought resistance, Agricult", Meteorol, 14, pp.59~84 (1979)
- Keeley JE, "Carbon assimilation characteristics of the aquatic CAM plant, Isoetes howellii", Plant Physiol, 76, pp.525~530 (1984)
- 이준상, "Current Theories for Mechanism of Stomatal Opening: Influence of Blue Light, Mesophyll Cells, and Sucrose", Journal of Plant Biology(한국식물학회지), 50(5), pp.523~526 (2007), 한국식물학회
- Lee JS, "The effects of ABA on Cd2+-induced physiological responses in Commelina communis L", 23(1), pp.47~51 (2005)
- Lee JS, "Effect of the mesophyll on stomatal opening in Commelina communis", J. Exp. Bot, 252, pp.951~957 (1992)
- Loomis R, "Productivity of agricultural ecosystems, In Photosynthesis and Productivity in Different Environments", pp.145~172 (1975), Cambridge University Press
- Maroco JP, "Oxygen requirement and inhibition of C4 photosynthesis", Plant Physiol, 116, pp.823~832 (1998)
- Oh HH, "Dissembly of chlorophyll-protein complex in Arabidopsis thaliana during dark induced folier senescence", J. Plant Biol, 39(4), pp.301~304 (1996)
- Oquist G, "Photoinhibition of photosynthesis represents a mechanism for the long term regulation of photosystem II", Planta, 186, pp.450~460 (1992)
- Patel A, "Relationship between respiration and CAM-Cycling in Peperomia camptotricha", Plant Physiol, 84, pp.640~642 (1987)
- Schreider U, "Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthetic energy conversion", Walz, Germany, 856~ (1997)
- Sternberg LD, "Oxygen and hydrogen isotope ratios of water from photosynthetic tissues of CAM and C3 plants", Plant Physiol, 82, pp.428~431 (1986)
- Taiz L, "Plant Physiology, 3th edn", pp.690~ (2003), Sinauet Associates
- Teeri JA, "Climatic patterns and the distribution of C4 grasses in North America", Oecologia, 23, pp.1~12 (1976)
- Wu MX, "Temperature effects on phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase from a CAM and a C4 Plant: A comparative study", Plant Physiol, 85, pp.497~501 (1987)