APEX 모형을 이용한 밭작물(콩, 배추) 물발자국 영향 평가
Assessment & Estimation of Water Footprint on Soybean and Chinese Cabbage by APEX Model
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
BACKGROUND: The water footprint (WF) is an indicator of freshwater use that appears not only at direct water use of a consumer or producer, but also at the indirect water use. As an indicator of ‘water use’, the water footprint includes the green, blue, and grey WF, and differs from the classical measure of ‘water withdrawal’ because of green and grey WF. This study was conducted to assess and estimate the water footprint of the soybean and Chinese cabbage. METHODS AND RESULTS: APEX model with weather data, soil and water quality data from NAS (National Institute of Agricultural Sciences), and farming data from RDA (Rural Development Administration) was operated for analyzing the WF of the crops. As the result of comparing the yield estimated from APEX with the yield extracted from statistic data of each county, the coefficients of determination were 0.83 for soybean and 0.97 for Chinese cabbage and p-value was statistically significant. The WFs of the soybean and Chinese cabbage at production procedure were 1,985 L/Kg and 58 L/Kg, respectively. This difference may have originated from the cultivation duration. The WF ratios of soybean were 91.1% for green WF and 8.9% for grey WF, but the WF ratios of Chinese cabbage were 41.5% for green WF and 58.5% for grey WF. CONCLUSION: These results mean that the efficiency of water use for soybean is better than that for Chinese cabbage. The results could also be useful as an information to assess environmental impact of water use and agricultural farming on soybean and Chinese cabbage.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The water footprint (WF) is an indicator of freshwater use that appears not only at direct water use of a consumer or producer, but also at the indirect water use. As an indicator of ‘water use’, the water footprint includes the green, blue, and grey WF, and differs from the classical measure of ‘water withdrawal’ because of green and grey WF. This study was conducted to assess and estimate the water footprint of the soybean and Chinese cabbage. METHODS AND RESULTS: APEX model with weather data, soil and water quality data from NAS (National Institute of Agricultural Sciences), and farming data from RDA (Rural Development Administration) was operated for analyzing the WF of the crops. As the result of comparing the yield estimated from APEX with the yield extracted from statistic data of each county, the coefficients of determination were 0.83 for soybean and 0.97 for Chinese cabbage and p-value was statistically significant. The WFs of the soybean and Chinese cabbage at production procedure were 1,985 L/Kg and 58 L/Kg, respectively. This difference may have originated from the cultivation duration. The WF ratios of soybean were 91.1% for green WF and 8.9% for grey WF, but the WF ratios of Chinese cabbage were 41.5% for green WF and 58.5% for grey WF. CONCLUSION: These results mean that the efficiency of water use for soybean is better than that for Chinese cabbage. The results could also be useful as an information to assess environmental impact of water use and agricultural farming on soybean and Chinese cabbage.
참고문헌 (20)
- Aldaya, M. M., "The water needed for Italians to eat pasta and pizza", Agricultural Systems, 103, pp.351~360 (2010)
- Choi, S. K., "Simulating the effects of agricultural management on water quality dynamics in rice paddies for sustainable rice production - model development and validation", Water, 9(11), pp.869~ (2017)
- 최순군, "APEX-Paddy 모델을 이용한 기후변화에 따른 논벼 생산량 및 증발산량 변화 예측", 한국농공학회논문집, 59(4), pp.27~42 (2017), 한국농공학회[DOI]
- Ercin, A. E., "The water footprint of soy milk and soy burger and equivalent animal products", Ecological Indicators, 18, pp.392~402 (2012)
- The agricultural policy environmental extender (APEX) model: An emerging tool for landscape and watershed environmental analyses, "Gassman, P. W.", Iowa State University, ~ (2009)
- Hargreaves, G. H., "Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature", American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 1(2), pp.96~99 (1985)
- Hoekstra, A. Y., "The Water Footprint Assessment Manual: Setting the Global Standard", pp.2~45 (2011), Earthscan Ltd
- Huang, J., "The impact of local crops consumption on the water resources in Beijing", Journal of Cleaner Production, 21, pp.45~50 (2012)
- 김준범, "쌀 농업에 대한 지역별 물 발자국 산정에 관한 연구", 대한환경공학회지, 35(11), pp.827~834 (2013), 대한환경공학회[DOI]
- Mekonnen, M. M., "Water footprint benchmarks for crop production : A first global assessment", Ecological Indicators, 46, pp.214~223 (2014)
- Monteith, J. L., "Evaporation and environment", Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology, 19, pp.205~234 (1965)
- 오부영, "AquaCrop을 이용한 기후변화에 따른 미래 논벼 물발자국 변화 분석", 한국농공학회논문집, 59(1), pp.45~55 (2017), 한국농공학회
- Rees, W. E., "Revisiting carrying capacity: Areabased indicators of sustainability", Population and Environment, 17(3), pp.195~215 (1996)
- Son, M. J., "Water footprint assessment on major agricultural products – A case of water footprint assessment on cabbages", The Korean Society of Life Cycle Assessment, 14(2), pp.98~109 (2013)
- Stockle, C. O., "A method for estimating the direct and climatic effects of rising atmospheric carbon dioxide on growth and yield of crops : Part I―Modification of the EPIC model for climate change analysis", Agricultural Systems, 38(3), pp.225~238 (1992)
- Vanham, D., "The water footprint of the EU for different diets", Ecological Indicators, 32, pp.1~8 (2013)
- Wang, F., "Water footprint sustainability assessment for the chemical sector at the regional level", Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 142, pp.69~77 (2019)
- Williams, J. R., "Agricultural policy", environmental extender model theoretical documentation version 0806, 2015, pp.28~61
- Yoo, S. H., "Estimating water footprint of paddy rice in Korea", Paddy and Water Environment, 12(1), pp.43~54 (2014)
- 유승환, "한국의 밭작물 생산에서의 물발자국 산정", 한국농공학회논문집, 56(3), pp.65~74 (2014), 한국농공학회