일본의 신자유주의적 ‘구조개혁특구제도'
Japanese Structural Reform Districts and its Implications
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
The study analyzed how Japanese structural reform districts have been operated in terms of new-liberalism in order to activate the regional economy. The main aim of the research is how Japanese structural districts in the process of activation have been implemented in relation to characteristics of local governments, governmental departments, regional type, the field of projects, and regulations type etc. There are 1,114 structural reform districts in Japan, until June 2010. These districts are classified in relation to the type of characteristics, researched with meaningful statistics data which is published by the department of structural reform districts, using the statistical package of SPSS. According to the results of the research, Japanese structural reform districts have been increased from first period to 10th period, and then the increasing rate has been shrunk gradually. The field of social welfare districts is reported the highest number out of other fields. And then, Number of other structural reform districts is educational districts, agricultural districts in orders. In the type of local governments,the type of city shows 53.3% itself, Jung/Chon shows 28.7%. Japanese structural reform districts are with relations to Department of Finance mostly (30.2%). Department of welfare and labour is reported secondly (26.5%). With the results of research, in order to success special districts in Korea, Koran government should have made a long-term vision, conduct benchmarking of OECD countries. And Korean special districts should have implemented not short-term economy effects, but future strategic industries activating regional characteristics. Government should have focused on reengineering of national economy system, accumulated social capital and improved level of social life. Lastly, central government should have explored long-term development strategy in order to solve national structural problems and adapt new globalization environments.
참고문헌 (37)
- 김순은, "영국과 일본의 지방분권 비교분석", 한국지방자치학회보, pp.101~122 (2001)
- 김순은, "일본 지방분권의 평가와 시사점: 지방분권 모형을 중심으로", 한국지방자치학회보, 15(3) (2003), 한국지방자치학회
- 김순은, "지방분권 정책의 집행에 영향을 미친 요인 분석 : 일본의 사례를 중심으로", 지방정부연구, 7(4), pp.7~30 (2003), 한국지방정부학회
- 선정원, "일본의 구조개혁특구제도의 분석과 규제자유구역제도의 한국에의 도입방안", 법제, 9, pp.4~28 (2003)
- 소순창, "일본 지방분권개혁의 과정과 평가, 그리고 방향 : 기관위임사무제도의 폐지를 중심으로", 지방정부연구, 6(4), pp.251~273 (2002), 한국지방정부학회
- 소순창, "일본의 고령자복지정책과 기관위임사무제도의 폐지: 재정적자의 결과를 중심으로", 한국행정학보, 35(2), pp.97~115 (2001)
- 전유신, "도시성장관리를위한개발밀도관리모델 수립에관한연구", 국토연구, 38, pp.3~61 (2003), 국토연구원
- 이상영, "일본의 구조개혁특구", 보건복지포럼, 120, pp.74~83 (2006)
- 장철순, "일본 구조개혁특구사업의 성과와 시사점", 국토, 336, pp.44~50 (2009)
- 재정경제부, "지역특화발전특구제도 도입을 위한 지방순회 설명회자료", ~ (2003)
- 정덕주, "일본 중앙정부의 지방정부에 대한 관여관계 변화", 한국지방자치학회보, 15(2) (2003), 한국지방자치학회
- 채원호, "전환기 일본의 지방분권개혁: 1990년대의 지방분권개혁을 중심으로", 한국행정연구, 9(3), pp.193~217 (2000)
- 최우용, "현대행정과 지방자치법" (2002), 세종출판사
- 허재환, "경제특구와 국토정책", 동북아 비지니스 거점화를 위한 경제특구 개발방향 정책세미나자료 (2002), 대한국토도시계획학회
- 井筒宏和, "構造改革特區制度 について", 地方自治, 668, pp.54~92 (2003)
- 伊藤敏安, "地方分権時代の国土計画と地域, In 地域政策の道標" (2002), ぎょうせい
- 大塚先, "日本の制度改革" (1999), 有信堂
- 構造改革特別区域推進本部, "構造改革特区域推進のための基本方針", ~ (2003)
- 構造改革特別区域のための基本方針について, "構造改革特別区域推進本部", ~ (2003)
- 構造改革特別区域推進本部, "資料: 第1-23會認定特區", ~ (2010)
- 構造改革特別区域推進本部, "資料: 全國展開等により取下げられた特區", ~ (2010)
- 加茂利男, "構造改革と自治体再編" (2003), 自治体研究社
- 角瀨保雄, "大競爭時代と規制緩和" (1998), 新日本出版社
- 金子弘道, "特区構想は實現刷るか?制度運用のカぎを握るもの", 自治硏究, 523, pp.44~48 (2003)
- 並河信乃, "地方分權と構造改革特区", 自治硏, 523, pp.33~40 (2003)
- 西尾勝, "未完の分權改革" (1999), 岩波書店
- 21世紀政策硏究所, "構造改革特区の可能性" (2003), 21世紀政策硏究所
- 構造改革特区の現狀と今後の課題, "21世紀政策硏究所", 21世紀政策硏究所, ~ (2004)
- 日本總合硏究所, "構造改革特区を成功させるために", Japan Research Review (2002)
- 清原政忠, "国土の均衡ある発展を考える", 人と国土21, 21(5) (2001)
- 進藤兵, "地方分権から地方構造改革へ, In 構造改革と自治体再編" (2003), 自治体研究社
- 神野直彦, "地域経済の経済学" (2002), 中央公論新社
- 横山直, "構造改革特区を通じた規制改革と産業の集積に関する考察", 内閣府政策総括官景気判断政策分析ディスカションペーパー (2002)
- 八代尙宏, "規制改革: 法と經濟學からの提言" (2003), 有斐閣
- 吉田民雄, "地方自治∙新世紀 都市政府のガバナンス" (2003), 中央經濟社
- 春名史久, "構造改革特区制度の槪要", 自治硏究, 523, pp.49~55 (2003)
- 厚生省, "厚生白書" (1996)
