주주제안제도에 관한 비교법적 고찰
Comparative Legal Research on Shareholder Proposal Rule
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
The shareholder proposal right, which was introduced to protect shareholders from the board of directors and appointed managers, has not been used so frequently in the mood of shareholder's indifference to corporate governance. But after emerging of institutional investors, shareholder proposal rule attracts much more attention. In our commercial law we have shareholder proposal rule but it isn't stipulated in detail, compared with that of other country. In relation to the rule in our commercial law, some revisions of that rule or new stipulations are needed as follows. 1) some procedural regulations on rejecting the proposal, 2) some stipulations on proxy rules relating to the shareholder proposal rule, 3) the forbidden clause of repeated proposal, etc. Like other legal system, the shareholder proposal rule has not only the positive function that it helps the realization of corporate democracy, but the negative function that it interferes with the effective management of corporate. So besides the detailed legislation, we need to take into consideration the balancing of two different function in constructing that rule case by case in order to protecting the shareholder and corporate's benefit.
참고문헌 (10)
- 김원기, "상법(개정안)상의 주주제안권" (1998)
- "주주총회 운영의 법적 문제" (2003), 도서출판 명성사
- "현대회사법론" (2001), 삼지원
- "“전자거래기본법의 개정방향”" (2001)
- "유가증권의 전자화에 관한 법률적 고찰" (2002), 한국법제연구원
- "“개정 상법상의 주주제안권” 인권과 정의 통권 제270호"
- "“주주제안권의 행사요건과 그 문제점” 상사법연구", 21(3)
- "株式會社有限會社法" (2004), 有斐閣
- "Reevaluating the shareholder proposal rule in the wake of Cracker Barrel and the era of institutional investors" (1999)
- "Corporation" (1997), Aspen Law & Business
