株式會社 理事의 內部統制義務에 관한 硏究 -대법원 2008.9.11. 선고 2006다68636 판결-
A Study on a Duty of Internal Control of a Director in Publicly Held Corporations
0
조회
0
다운로드
30
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Publicly held corporations need to establish effective internal control system in order to minimize their loss resulting from illegal acts or misconduct of the management. The establishment of internal control system may contribute to improving corporate governance. Therefore, the board of directors of the publicly held corporations is ultimately responsible for establishing internal control system. As a result, a director has a duty of internal control in the publicly held corporations. In America, establishment of internal control system in the publicly held corporations should be enforced under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The American courts confirm that a director has a duty of care related to internal control in the publicly held corporations. In Japan, both Corporation Act and Act of Transaction of Financial Products require that the board establish internal control system under the publicly held corporations. Actually, the Japanese court judged in the Daiwa Bank case of 2000 that the company should establish effective internal control system and, therefore, a director should have a duty to monitor internal control system as well as a duty of internal control. In recent cases over the accounting scandals of the Daewoo Corporation, the Supreme Court judged that a director of the publicly held corporations had a duty of internal control. That is to say, internal control system is necessary effectively to carry out the monitoring functions of the board under the publicly held corporations. In the context of the making of good corporate governance, it is necessary for the publicly held corporations to reinforce and improve internal control system in Korea.
Abstract
Publicly held corporations need to establish effective internal control system in order to minimize their loss resulting from illegal acts or misconduct of the management. The establishment of internal control system may contribute to improving corporate governance. Therefore, the board of directors of the publicly held corporations is ultimately responsible for establishing internal control system. As a result, a director has a duty of internal control in the publicly held corporations. In America, establishment of internal control system in the publicly held corporations should be enforced under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The American courts confirm that a director has a duty of care related to internal control in the publicly held corporations. In Japan, both Corporation Act and Act of Transaction of Financial Products require that the board establish internal control system under the publicly held corporations. Actually, the Japanese court judged in the Daiwa Bank case of 2000 that the company should establish effective internal control system and, therefore, a director should have a duty to monitor internal control system as well as a duty of internal control. In recent cases over the accounting scandals of the Daewoo Corporation, the Supreme Court judged that a director of the publicly held corporations had a duty of internal control. That is to say, internal control system is necessary effectively to carry out the monitoring functions of the board under the publicly held corporations. In the context of the making of good corporate governance, it is necessary for the publicly held corporations to reinforce and improve internal control system in Korea.
참고문헌 (38)
- 이철송, "회사법강의" (2008), 박영사
- 정찬형, "상법강의(상)" (2008), 박영사
- 최준선, "회사법" (2007), 삼영사
- 삼일회계법인 譯, "전사적 리스크 관리-통합 프레임웍" (2006), 하이북스
- 강희갑, "미국의 기업지배구조 및 회계감사에 관한 최근의 개혁입법", 상사법연구, 21(4) (2003), 제21권 제4호(2003)
- 김대연, "회사의 내부통제시스템과 이사의 감시의무", 상사판례연구, 12 (2001)
- 김성범, "내부회계관리제도 모범규준 해설", BFL, (13) (2005)
- 김이수, "미국법상 이사의 감시의무와 위반책임", 상사법연구, 20(1) (2001), 제20권 제1호(2001)
- 김택주, "Sarbanes-Oxley법과 기업회계의 공정성 확보", 상사판례연구, 16 (2004), 제16집(2004)
- 박세화, "내부통제시스템의 설계와 기업지배구조에 관한 회사법적 고찰", 상사법연구, 26(2) (2007)
- 박세화, "효과적인 내부통제 체제 구축을 위한 입법적 과제", 재산법연구, 23(2) (2006)
- 안수현, "회계제도개혁법의 입법 현황과 실무상 몇 가지 고려점", 증권법연구, 4(2) (2003)
- 안수현, "내부통제의 회사법제 정비를 위한 검토", 상사판례연구, 20(2) (2007)
- 정? 대, "주식회사의 내부통제시스템에 관한 비교법적 고찰<상>,<중>,<하>", TAX magazine, (370) (2007)
- 정? 대, "미국의 주식회사의 내부통제제도와 이사의 의무에 관한 연구", 비교사법, 12(4) (2005)
- 정? 대, "금융기관의 내부통제제도에 관한 연구", 상사법연구, 22(4) (2003)
- 정? 대, "일본의 신회사법상의 주식회사의 내부통제시스템에 관한 연구", 상장협연구, (54) (2006), 제54호(2006)
- 정? 대, "내부통제제도와 기업지배구조(Corporate Governance)”, 내부통제제도의 법제 개선방안(워크샵 자료집)" (2006), 한국법제연구원
- 정병석, "기업의 준법관리제도 도입을 위한 시론", 상사법연구, 26(2) (2007)
- 정봉진, "이사의 감시의무에 관한 미국법 연구", 비교사법, 10(2) (2003), 제10권 2호(2003)
- 정쾌영, "내부통제제도에 관한 고찰", 상사법연구, 26(3) (2007)
- 황성식, "효과적 내부통제를 통한 주주가치의 제고", BFL, (4) (2004)
- KPMGビジネスアシュアランス 編, "CSR經營と內部統制, 別冊商事法務", 商事法務, 278 (2004)
- アンダ-ソンㆍ毛利ㆍ友常法律事務所, "新會社法の讀み方" (2005), 金融財政事情硏究會
- 鳥羽至英ㆍ八田進二ㆍ高田敏文 共譯, "內部統制の綜合的" (2003), 白桃書房
- 近藤光男, "新版 改正株式會社法 Ⅳ", 弘文堂, ~ (2006)
- 中央靑山監査法人 譯, "全社的リスクマネジメント" (2006), 東洋經濟新報社
- 遠藤博志, "企業法制改革とこれからの會社經營" (2006), 商事法務
- 江頭憲治郞, "株式會社法", 有斐閣, ~ (2008)
- 神田秀樹, "會社法", 弘文堂, ~ (2006)
- 小?德武, "內部統制に關する外部報告制度", 龍谷法學, 35(4) (2003)
- 河村賢治, "エンロン事件後における米國企業統治立法 , 21世紀の企業法制(酒卷俊雄先生古稀記念" (2003), 商事法務
- 佐藤丈文, "米企業改革法とNYSEㆍNASDAQ新規則案の槪要(上),(中),(下)", 商事法務, (1639) (2002)
- 堀裕, "金融商品取引法上の內部統制(上)", 金融法務事情, 25(1787) (2006)
- American Law Institute, "rinciples of Corporate Governance: Analysis and Recommendations" (1992), Proposed Final Draft
- Committee on Corporate Laws, "orporate Director's Guidebook, Fourth Edition, American Bar Association" (2004)
- Model Business Corporation Act, "Official Text, American Bar Association", ~ (2005)
- "Enterprise Risk Management-Integrated Framework, Executive Summary"[URL]