적대적 M&A방어수단의 도입 필요성 - 2008년 경영권방어법제 개선위원회의 입법초안을 중심으로 -
The Need for Defensive Measures against Hostile Takeover
0
조회
0
다운로드
12
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
Legal issues related to hostile takeovers and defensive measures are the most topical issue in korean corporate law. In 2006 and 2008, Revision Draft to Korean Commercial Code(KCC) was presented to the National Assembly. The 2006 Revision Draft to KCC introduced new types of class of shares. Thus, according to the draft, a firm may issue classes of shares that differ contents with respect to the matters listed in the following items, (1) dividends of profits or interest; (2) distribution of residual assets; (3)cancellation of shares using profits; (4) any matters on which voting rights are exercisable at shareholders' meeting; (5) the appointment of directors or corporate auditors at a meeting of shareholders of each class; (6) a veto right over any proposal submitted to shareholders' meeting. However, 2008 Draft to KCC deleted the class shares that differ in their contents with respect to the matter in item (5) and (6) due to the possibility of the abuse as defensive measures against hostile takeover. But, there also were the social needs that defensive measures shall be introduced. Thus, the Ministry of Justice organized a group named "Committee for Improvement of Corporate Control Defense Legal Framework" to study and formulate a proper response to hostile takeovers in April 2008. The committee surveyed the legal frameworks for defensive measures in U.S., U.K., and several other countries in Europe, and decided to make revising draft to KCC in order to introduce share warrant(poison pill), multi voting share, golden share(veto right share), class voting share and super majority clause. Especially, the committee concluded that introduction of share warrant would assist Korean companies in coping with inefficiency of hostile takeover. However, a number of experts is objecting to committee decisions, because that who is protected by it would be not shareholder but company managers. In conclusion, this paper suggest that defensive measures should be introduced as soon as possible, but abuse of defensive measures should be absolutely prevented.
참고문헌 (23)
- 법무부, "경영권 방어수단 도입관련 그간의 논의경과와 향후계획", 법무부, ~ (2008)
- 증권법학회, "적대적 M&A 방어수단관련연구", ~ (2008)
- 권종호, "방어수단으로서 종류주식 ― 2006년 개정안과 2008년 개정안을 중심으로 ―", 상사법연구, 27(2), pp.51~77 (2008), 한국상사법학회
- 권종호, "일본의 적대적 M&A법제의 글로벌화와 시사점", 전경련, ~ (2008)
- 강희철, "미국경영권 방어제도의 시사점", M&A의 성장동력화세미나 (2008), 지식경제부·대한상공회의소
- 강희철, "주주총회특별결의 가중에 관한 설명자료", ~ (2008)
- 노혁준, "복수의결권주식도입시안검토에 관한 설명자료", ~ (2008)
- 안수현, "황금주(특정사항동의권에 관한 종류주식·이사선해임에 관한 주식)도입에 관한 소위원회개정시안설명자료", ~ (2008)
- 연태훈, "적대적 M&A와 방어책", ~ (2008)
- 여은정, "M&A현황과 경영권보호제도에 대한 평가", ~ (2008)
- 신현한, "경영권보호의 필요성과 방어기제", ~ (2008)
- 김우찬, "적대적 M&A방어수단 도입을 위한 상법개정 공청회 토론문", ~ (2009)
- 정윤모, "M&A제도의 정합성제고", M&A의 성장동력화세미나 (2008), 지식경제부·대한상공회의소
- Andre, "Tender Offers or Corporate Control: A Critical Analysis and Proposal Reform", Del. J. Corp. L, 12, pp.870~ (1987)
- Bebchuk, "The Case for Facilitating Competing Tender Offers", Harv. L. Rev, 95, pp.1028~ (1982)
- Prentice, "Hostile Tender Offers and The "Nancy Regan Defence": May Target Boards "Just Say No"", Should They Be Allowed To?, 1990, pp.15, 377~
- 小林量, "比較会社法研究ー21世紀の会社法制を模索してー in: コーポレート・ファイナンス法制の柔構造化" (2003), 商事法務
- 葉玉匡美, "新会社法100門", ~ (2006), 第2版
- 宍戸善一, "種類株式、ストック・オプション等の自由化", ジュリスト, (1206) (2001)
- あずさ監査法人, "種類株式のガイドブック", ~ (2007)
- 藤本周, "敵対的買収防衛策の導入状況", 商事法務, 1877 (2009)
- 企業価値報告書, "企業価値研究会", 別册商事法務, 287~ (2005)
- 権鍾浩, "アメリカにおける会社の支配権取得と取締役の行為規制", 本郷法政紀要, (1) (1993)
