부실대출에 대한 금융기관 이사의 책임과 경영판단의 원칙 - 북해도 척식은행 ‘소피아사건’에 대한 검토 -
Business Judgement Rule and Bank Directors' Decisions on Band Loans
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Hokkaido Takushoku Bank was one of the most lenders to real estate during the 1990's in Hokkaido. Its financing activities covered across the Hokkaido, including the parts of Japan. It was collapsed under the weight of bad-loan losses in 1997. As a result of the extensive failures that have occurred since 1997, legal action against previous bank directors, who made decision to bad loans, was issued. The question is, what should be the business judgement rule for a bank director, and in particular, what should be the court standard for determining if the duty of care has been breached by the director. This article examines the Japanese case so called 'bad loan to sophia group in Hokkaido' that brought to supreme court related to bank directors' responsibilities and discusses the business judgement rule in Japan. The differences and similarities in legal systems and the court rulings in Korea and Japan also are compared.
Abstract
The Hokkaido Takushoku Bank was one of the most lenders to real estate during the 1990's in Hokkaido. Its financing activities covered across the Hokkaido, including the parts of Japan. It was collapsed under the weight of bad-loan losses in 1997. As a result of the extensive failures that have occurred since 1997, legal action against previous bank directors, who made decision to bad loans, was issued. The question is, what should be the business judgement rule for a bank director, and in particular, what should be the court standard for determining if the duty of care has been breached by the director. This article examines the Japanese case so called 'bad loan to sophia group in Hokkaido' that brought to supreme court related to bank directors' responsibilities and discusses the business judgement rule in Japan. The differences and similarities in legal systems and the court rulings in Korea and Japan also are compared.
참고문헌 (25)
- 구회근, "회사 임원의 업무상 배임죄에 관한 판례분석", 기업소송연구, 2005(1) (2006), 기업소송연구회
- 권재열, "경영판단의 원칙의 도입여부를 다시 논함", 상사법연구, 19(2) (2000), 한국상사법학회
- 김재범, "대출결정시 금융기관 이사의 주의의무와 경영판단의 원칙 -대상판결 : 대법원 2006.11.9. 선고 2004다41651, 41668 판결-", 상사판례연구, 21(1), pp.3~35 (2008), 한국상사판례학회
- 김택주, "회사법판례의 변화와 전망", 상사판례연구, 23(1), pp.63~138 (2010), 한국상사판례학회
- 송인방, "경영판단의 원칙의 상법에의 도입가부에 관한 검토", 기업법연구, 5 (2000), 한국기업법학회
- 송종준, "경영판단원칙과 그 수용상의 과제", 인권과정의, (364) (2006), 대한변호사협회
- 송옥렬, "이사의 민사책임과 형사책임의 판단기준", 상사판례연구, 19 (2006), 한국상사판례학회
- 양만식, "일본 회사법상 이사의 의무와 책임추궁", 상사법연구, 28(1), pp.43~91 (2009), 한국상사법학회
- 이상돈, "경영실패와 경영진의 형사책임", 법조, (560) (2003)
- 정동윤, "「주석 상법(Ⅲ)」제3판" (1999), 한국사법행정학회
- 조국, "기업범죄 통제에 있어서 형법의 역할과 한계", 형사법연구, 19(3-하), pp.163~186 (2007), 한국형사법학회
- 조기영, "배임죄의 제한해석과 경영판단의 원칙- 경영판단 원칙 도입론 비판 -", 형사법연구, 19(1) (2007), 한국형사법학회
- 정대, "미국의 금융기관 이사의 주의의무에 관한 고찰", 비교사법, 9(2) (2002), 한국비교사법학회
- 주강원, "상법상 특별배임죄에 대한 연구", 법학연구, 18(3), pp.361~400 (2008), 법학연구원
- 최병규, "경영판단원칙과 그의 수용 방안- 최근 독일의 입법 내용을 중심으로 -", 기업법연구, 19(2), pp.107~128 (2005), 한국기업법학회
- 한석훈, "경영진의 손해배상책임과 경영판단 원칙", 상사법연구, 27(4), pp.125~159 (2009), 한국상사법학회
- 岡山昌浩, "銀行の取締役の融資決定につき善管注意義務された事例", 商事法務, (1589) (2001)
- 近藤光男, "銀行の融資判斷と取締役の責任-中央銀行代表訴訟判決をめぐって", 金融法務事情, (1478) (1997)
- 森田果, "わか國に經營判斷の原則は存在しているか", 商事法務, (1858) (2009)
- 神崎克郞, "銀行の取締役の融資決定をする際の善管注意義務", 金融法務事情, (1492) (2001)
- 松山昇平, "經營判斷の原則と取締役の責任-拓銀事件(最三小決平21.11.9)契機として-", 金融法務事情, (1896) (2010)
- 松山昇平, "銀行取締役の融資判斷における注意義務", 金融法務事情, (1883) (2009)
- 吉井敦子, "銀行融資と取締役の注意義務" (1999), 新日本法規
- "金融法務事情", 2010, ~
- Melvin Aron Eisenberg, "Corporation and Business Associations", ~ (1996)