자본시장법상 불공정거래와 보호법익 – 시세조종과 부당이득을 중심으로 -
Criminal Penalty for Market Misconduct and the Concept of ‘Profit Gained or Loss Avoided’
0
조회
0
다운로드
15
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Criminal penalty for market misconduct under the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act 2007 depends on the size of ‘profit gained or loss avoided’. This paper examines 3 issues: firstly, whether the approach of linking criminal penalty to the amount of ‘profit gained or loss avoided’ is reasonable, secondly, whether the concept of ‘profit gained or loss avoided’ means actual and realized profit or not, and thirdly, how to calculate the amount of ‘profit gained or loss avoided’. Firstly, the approach of linking criminal penalty to the amount of ‘profit gained or loss avoided’ is reasonable in that the size of ‘profit gained and loss avoided’ may indicate the violation of market integrity. Secondly, the concept of ‘profit gained or loss avoided’ does not refer to an actual and/or realized profit in that it is a normative standard to indicate the violation of market integrity. However, as it is also determining the upper and lower limits of the criminal penalty for market misconduct, the amount should be calculated on the basis of causation and the principle of liability. Thirdly, the concept of ‘profit gained or loss avoided’ includes unrealized profit as well. However, the calculation of the amount of the ‘profit gained or loss avoided’ should be adjusted to reflect the extent to which the sale or purchase price was increased or decreased by other extraneous matters whether favourable or unfavourable.
Abstract
Criminal penalty for market misconduct under the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act 2007 depends on the size of ‘profit gained or loss avoided’. This paper examines 3 issues: firstly, whether the approach of linking criminal penalty to the amount of ‘profit gained or loss avoided’ is reasonable, secondly, whether the concept of ‘profit gained or loss avoided’ means actual and realized profit or not, and thirdly, how to calculate the amount of ‘profit gained or loss avoided’. Firstly, the approach of linking criminal penalty to the amount of ‘profit gained or loss avoided’ is reasonable in that the size of ‘profit gained and loss avoided’ may indicate the violation of market integrity. Secondly, the concept of ‘profit gained or loss avoided’ does not refer to an actual and/or realized profit in that it is a normative standard to indicate the violation of market integrity. However, as it is also determining the upper and lower limits of the criminal penalty for market misconduct, the amount should be calculated on the basis of causation and the principle of liability. Thirdly, the concept of ‘profit gained or loss avoided’ includes unrealized profit as well. However, the calculation of the amount of the ‘profit gained or loss avoided’ should be adjusted to reflect the extent to which the sale or purchase price was increased or decreased by other extraneous matters whether favourable or unfavourable.
참고문헌 (20)
- 자본시장 불공정거래 판례분석, "금융감독원", ~ (2009)
- 김건식, "자본시장법 2판" (2010), 두성사
- 김병태, "시세조종 관련 부당이득에 대한 연구", 인권과 정의, (382), pp.78~100 (2008), 대한변호사협회
- 김용재, "자본시장과 법(상)" (2011), 고려대학교출판부
- 김정수, "자본시장법원론" (2011), 서울파이낸스앤로그룹
- 대법원 양형위원회, "양형기준안에 관한 제5차 공청회 자료집" (2012), 대법원
- 최정진, "범죄수익은닉의 규제 및 처벌등에 관한 법률해설" (2002), 법무부
- 임재연, "자본시장법" (2012), 박영사
- 임채웅, "주가조작 관련 범죄에 관한 법리의 연구", 인권과 정의, (343), pp.73~96 (2005), 대한변호사협회
- 조재연, "자본시장법 제443조에서의 '내부자거래규제 위반행위로 얻은 이익 또는 회피한 손실액' 산정방법에 대한 小考", 한양법학, (32), pp.339~356 (2010), 한양법학회
- 증권선물거래소, "증권거래법령 연혁집 I" (2006)
- 최성진, "자금세탁범죄 해설과 판례", pp.2011, 법무부
- 최인섭, "한국의 금융범죄 실태와 사회적 대응방안" (2002), 한국형사정책연구원
- 표성수, "증권거래법 제188조의 4 시세조종 등 불공정행위에 대한 형법적 문제(하)", 법조, 55(6), pp.160~187 (2006), 법조협회
- 권종호, "자본시장법" (2009), 博英社
- Tony D'Aloisio, Chairman, "Insider Trading and Market Manipulation", Speech at the Supreme Court of Victoria Law Conference Melbourne (2010)
- "House of Representatives, Parliament of Australia, Corporations Amendment (No. 1) Bill 2010", Explanatory Memorandum, ~ (2010)
- , 2010
- Corporations Amendment (No. 1) Bill 2010, "Sharon Scully", ~, pp.Bills Digest No. 42, 2010-11 (2010)
- Anna Y M Tam, "Financial Orders under Subsections 23(1)(b) and (c) of the Securities (Insider Dealing) Ordinance — Insider Dealing Tribunal v Shek Mei Ling", Hong Kong Law Journal, 30 (2000)
