벤처기업의 활성화를 위한 법 정책적 과제
Toward a Revitalization of Korea's Venture Businesses
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
As the Asian financial crisis of the mid 1990s hit the Korean economy and pushed up the unemployment rate dramatically, the Korean government felt strongly the need to bring changes to the overall economic structure, which it determined was too dependent on conglomerates and therefore unable to overcome barriers to growth. Consequently, it promoted the so-called "New Sprout Theory," which advocated the need to nurture and support young venture companies and allow them opportunities to thrive on their creative ideas and to invent innovative technology. Although there were already two laws - the Small and Medium Industry Basic Law and the SME Start-up Support Act - providing small and medium-size businesses and start-up companies with legal support, it was the Special Measures Law on Venture Business Support of 1997 (or "Venture Business Law") that enabled venture firms to gain access to more systemic and substantial support. Since then this law has functioned as the main device to nurture and provide funding for such companies. Helped by this policy shift and in the rapidly changing business environment in Korea, most venture companies were able to attract more attention from the public and were able to play new and important economic roles for society; however, a number of such firms were found guilty of engaging in numerous illegal acts, which disappointed many people and led them to have doubts about venture business in general. The reality is that many of Korea's venture companies have yet to materialize their creative potential and show any satisfactory performance, which will be the only way for them to meet the expectations of both the government and the public and to match the importance given to them by society. This essay reviews the current status of Korea's venture business related to policy enforcement and related legal systems and attempts to find ways for improvement and movement in a more desirable direction, especially ways to revitalize the country's venture businesses as a whole. Part II lists definitions of venture companies and business types. Part III analyzes major policies and legislation affecting venture businesses. In Part IV, the author suggests a few directions for more effective policies and legal systems as means to revitalize venture businesses in Korea.
Abstract
As the Asian financial crisis of the mid 1990s hit the Korean economy and pushed up the unemployment rate dramatically, the Korean government felt strongly the need to bring changes to the overall economic structure, which it determined was too dependent on conglomerates and therefore unable to overcome barriers to growth. Consequently, it promoted the so-called "New Sprout Theory," which advocated the need to nurture and support young venture companies and allow them opportunities to thrive on their creative ideas and to invent innovative technology. Although there were already two laws - the Small and Medium Industry Basic Law and the SME Start-up Support Act - providing small and medium-size businesses and start-up companies with legal support, it was the Special Measures Law on Venture Business Support of 1997 (or "Venture Business Law") that enabled venture firms to gain access to more systemic and substantial support. Since then this law has functioned as the main device to nurture and provide funding for such companies. Helped by this policy shift and in the rapidly changing business environment in Korea, most venture companies were able to attract more attention from the public and were able to play new and important economic roles for society; however, a number of such firms were found guilty of engaging in numerous illegal acts, which disappointed many people and led them to have doubts about venture business in general. The reality is that many of Korea's venture companies have yet to materialize their creative potential and show any satisfactory performance, which will be the only way for them to meet the expectations of both the government and the public and to match the importance given to them by society. This essay reviews the current status of Korea's venture business related to policy enforcement and related legal systems and attempts to find ways for improvement and movement in a more desirable direction, especially ways to revitalize the country's venture businesses as a whole. Part II lists definitions of venture companies and business types. Part III analyzes major policies and legislation affecting venture businesses. In Part IV, the author suggests a few directions for more effective policies and legal systems as means to revitalize venture businesses in Korea.
참고문헌 (23)
- 중소기업법령체계 개편방안 연구, "김광희", 중소기업연구원, ~ (2009)
- 벤처기업 관련제도의 합리적 개선방안, "김세종", 중소기업연구원, ~, pp.기본연구 08-9 (2008)
- 금융투자협회, "프리보드 지정기업 공시의무 해설", ~ (2011)
- 프리보드 활성화 방안, "노희진", 자본시장연구원, ~ (2010)
- 법제처, "법령입안 심사기준", ~ (2006)
- 벤처기업육성촉진지구실태조사및활성화방안, "송장준", 중소기업연구원, ~ (2008)
- 벤처기업성장경로에 관한 실증분석과 지원정책 개선방, "송치승", 중소기업연구원, ~ (2010)
- 이철송, "회사법강의(제20판)" (2012), 박영사
- 정기성, "벤처 Road Show", 벤처육성세미나교재 (1998)
- 벤처기업육성을 위한 조세지원방안, "김재진", 한국조세연구원, ~ (1997)
- 김한종, "벤처기업에 대한 회사법적 특례적용", 한림법학 FORUM, 10 (2001)
- 고재종, "벤처 캐피탈 투자 규제에 관한 비교법적 고찰 - 한국법과 인도법을 중심으로 -", 기업법연구, 25(2), pp.323~345 (2011), 한국기업법학회
- 국가과학기술자문회의, "21세기 바람직한 벤처기업 정책방향" (2002)
- 벤처기업 육성정책의 평가와 개선방안, "배광선", 산업연구원, ~, pp.KIET 정책자료, 제183호 (1999)
- 송인방, "벤처자금조달의 법적 환경의 개선 방안 - 대덕 R&D 특구를 중심으로 -", 기업법연구, 21(3), pp.185~232 (2007), 한국기업법학회
- 송재빈, "참여정부의 중소·벤처기업 정책방향, In 벤처기업의 지속적 육성 및 M&A 활성화편", 2003 유체기계 연구개발 발표회 논문집 (2003)
- 송호신, "중소기업의 사회적 책임(CSR)에 대한 입법적 구현", 재산법연구, 28(4), pp.281~328 (2012), 한국재산법학회
- 이재열, "벤처기업의 구조와 전략 코스닥 등록 기업의 주가와 그 결정요인에 대한 경제사회학적 연구", 한국사회학, 37(2), pp.1~33 (2003), 한국사회학회
- 중소기업 관련법령 개선을 위한 연구, "이준섭", 아주대학교 산학협력단, ~ (2010)
- 정상근, "벤처캐피탈의 規制에 관한 法的 考察", 상사법연구, 21(1), pp.21~653 (2002), 한국상사법학회
- 2012년도 중소기업육성시책, "중소기업청", ~ (2011)
- 2011사업년도 12월 결산 코스닥시장 상장법인의 사업보고서 분석, "한국거래소", ~, pp.KRX MARKET 제88호 (2012)
- Jack S. Levin, "Structure Venture Capital, Private Equity and Entrepreneurial Transaction" (2005), Aspen
