비디오게임 속 아바타의 퍼블리시티권에 관한 연구
A Study on Publicity Right of an Avatar in Video Game
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In Lindsay Lohan v. Take–Two Interactive Software, Inc., et al., the court held that the lawsuit failed because GTA V did not feature Lohan’s name, portrait, picture, or voice as required by New York Civil Rights Law Section 51. The court emphasized that, even if the GTA V characters were close approximations of Lohan, GTA V never featured the celebrities’ pictures, names, or acting talent in GTA V or in advertising materials for the game. The purpose of the study is to analyze legal solutions of this case and to study on considerations to be treated by game creators to protect the game business from a claim of infringement of right of publicity. To achieve the purpose, the study analyzed the Appellate Division of Supreme Court's decision by examining the legal points in the case. On the basis of the results of the analysis, the study found desirable principles to be applied to create game design effectively from right of publicity dispute.
Abstract
In Lindsay Lohan v. Take–Two Interactive Software, Inc., et al., the court held that the lawsuit failed because GTA V did not feature Lohan’s name, portrait, picture, or voice as required by New York Civil Rights Law Section 51. The court emphasized that, even if the GTA V characters were close approximations of Lohan, GTA V never featured the celebrities’ pictures, names, or acting talent in GTA V or in advertising materials for the game. The purpose of the study is to analyze legal solutions of this case and to study on considerations to be treated by game creators to protect the game business from a claim of infringement of right of publicity. To achieve the purpose, the study analyzed the Appellate Division of Supreme Court's decision by examining the legal points in the case. On the basis of the results of the analysis, the study found desirable principles to be applied to create game design effectively from right of publicity dispute.
참고문헌 (15)
- 박성호, "아바타(avatar) 법적문제점", 인권과 정의, (347), pp.36~56 (2005), 대한변호사협회
- F. Gregory Lastowka, "The Laws of the Virtual Worlds", California Law Review, 92, pp.6~ (2004)
- Jeffey H. Albright, "Lindsay Lohan v. Grand Theft Auto: Potential Changes for Actors and Actress in New Mexico", New Mexico Lawyer, 11(3), pp.3~4 (2016)
- 박준우, "퍼블리시티권의 침해요건 중 '상업적 이용'의 판단기준", 비교사법, 13(2), pp.495~522 (2006), 한국비교사법학회
- 최승재, "퍼블리시티권 침해와 손해배상의 범위에 대한 연구", 스포츠엔터테인먼트와 법, 11(3), pp.199~218 (2008), 한국스포츠엔터테인먼트법학회
- 박준우, "표현의 자유에 의한 퍼블리시티권의 제한 －상품의 디자인과 캐릭터로 이용한 경우를 중심으로－", 정보법학, 14(3), pp.141~162 (2010), 한국정보법학회
- 임상민, "퍼블리시티권 침해 판단기준", 지식재산연구, 8(4), pp.127~159 (2013), 한국지식재산연구원
- 이홍섭, "HMD에서 사용자와 아바타의 동작 연동에 대한 사용성 연구", 한국컴퓨터게임학회논문지, 28(3), pp.151~157 (2015), (사)한국컴퓨터게임학회
- 이홍섭, "3D HMD의 멀미증상 완화를 위한 조작방법에 관한 연구", 한국컴퓨터게임학회논문지, 27(4), pp.85~91 (2014), (사)한국컴퓨터게임학회
- Sang-Jo Jeong, "Intellectual Property, 2" (2011), Hongmoonsa
- Turkington, "Privacy Law, 2", ~ (2002)
- J. Thomas McCarthy, "The Rights of Publicity and Privacy Volume 1, 2", pp.2008, Thomson
- "142 A.D.3d 776, 37 N.Y.S.3d 20 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)" (2016)[URL]
- "Narrow Scope of New York Right of Publicity Statute Favors First Amendment, Not Lindsay Lohan" (2016)[URL]
- "Statutes & Interactive Map" (2016)[URL]