증권거래법 판례의 변화와 전망 - 자본시장법의 제정과 관련하여 -
Trends and Prospects of the Securities Cases
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act(Capital Markets Act) was enacted on Aug. 2007, and entered into force on Feb. 2009. The Securities and Exchanges Act(SEA) was absorbed into it. Capital Markets Act is carrying on the important articles of the SEA with making some changes. Therefore, old securities cases are useful to interpret the articles of Capital Markets Act. This paper aims to review and analyses the major or leading securities cases in SEA. The topics was divided into several parts as follow : the enactment of Capital Markets Act, the definition of security and the formation of selling on commission, the regulation of financial investment business, the regulation of issues and circulation of securities, the civil liability and assessment of damages arising from illegal auditing, and the regulation of unfair transaction. In conclusion, I will say that the old securities cases will have important effects on the interpretation and application of Capital Markets Act.
Abstract
Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act(Capital Markets Act) was enacted on Aug. 2007, and entered into force on Feb. 2009. The Securities and Exchanges Act(SEA) was absorbed into it. Capital Markets Act is carrying on the important articles of the SEA with making some changes. Therefore, old securities cases are useful to interpret the articles of Capital Markets Act. This paper aims to review and analyses the major or leading securities cases in SEA. The topics was divided into several parts as follow : the enactment of Capital Markets Act, the definition of security and the formation of selling on commission, the regulation of financial investment business, the regulation of issues and circulation of securities, the civil liability and assessment of damages arising from illegal auditing, and the regulation of unfair transaction. In conclusion, I will say that the old securities cases will have important effects on the interpretation and application of Capital Markets Act.
참고문헌 (28)
- 강대섭, "유가증권신고서등의 부실기재로 인한 손해배상청구권자의 범위- 유통시장에서의 증권취득자 포함 여부 -", 상사판례연구, 19(3), pp.219~257 (2006), 한국상사판례학회
- 권기훈, "선물업자의 설명의무", 상사판례연구, (17), pp.247~279 (2004), 한국상사판례학회
- 김건식, "증권거래법" (2009), 두성사
- 김정수, "현대증권법원론" (2002), 박영사
- 김지환, "證券投資勸誘와 適合性原則", 상사법연구, 21(1), pp.15~487 (2002), 한국상사법학회
- 김택주, "시세조종행위에 따른 손해배상책임", 상사판례연구, 18(2), pp.241~269 (2005), 한국상사판례학회
- 노태악, "증권거래법상 미공개내부정보에 관하여", 증권법연구, 2(1) (2001), 한국증권법학회
- 박삼철, "우리나라의 시세조종행위 규제에 관한 고찰", 증권조사월보, (216) (1995)
- 박임출, "內部者去來 規制法制의 改善方案", 증권법연구, 4(2), pp.67~105 (2003), 한국증권법학회
- 변제호, "자본시장법" (2009), 지원출판사
- 손주찬, "주권보관증의 성질", 사법행정, 7(7) (1966), 한국사법행정학회
- 안문택, "증권거래법개론" (1983), 박영사
- 안성포, "신탁법의 개정방향-법무부 2009년 신탁법 전면개정안을 중심으로-", 3개 대학 법학연구소(원) 공동학술대회 발표집 (2009)
- 양석완, "판례로 본 증권투자권유에 따른 적합성원칙", 기업법연구, 12, pp.299~330 (2003), 한국기업법학회
- 일본의 금융상품거래법에 관한 연구, "오성근", 한국법제연구원, ~ (2006)
- 이준섭, "공시책임에 관한 최근 판례의 분석과 비판", 상장협, (42) (2000), 한국상장회사협의회
- 임재연, "증권거래법" (2006), 박영사
- 장상균, "지배주식의 매도에 대한 구증권거래법상 단기매매차익 반환조항의 적용-대법원 2004.2.13. 선고 2001다36580 판결을 중심으로", BFL, (5) (2004), 서울대학교 금융법센터
- 자본시장과 금융투자업에 관한 법률 제정안, "재정경제부", ~ (2006)
- 전삼현, "허위사실 유포？허위표시를 통한 시세조종에 관한 판례 분석-대상판결 : 대법원 2003. 11. 14. 선고 2003도686 판결-", 상사판례연구, 18(4), pp.147~171 (2005), 한국상사판례학회
- 정준우, "證券業者의 不當한 投資勸誘行爲의 合理的 規制方案", 비교사법, 11(3), pp.427~460 (2004), 한국비교사법학회
- 증권감독원, "개정 증권거래법령 및 관계규정해설", 증권조사월보, (182) (1992)
- 한국증권법학회, "자본시장법(주석서Ⅰ, Ⅱ)" (2009), 박영사
- 大崎貞和, "解說金融商品去來法" (2007), 弘文堂
- 森田章, "證券業者の投資勸誘上の義務. in: 現代企業と有價證券の法理" (1994), 有斐閣
- 日野正晴, "金融商品取引法" (2009), 中央經濟社
- 河本一郞, "金融商品取引法讀本" (2008), 有斐閣
- 黑沼悅郞, "金融商品去來法" (2007), 日本經濟新聞出版社