주주총회 소집철회·변경의 법률관계
Withdrawal of the Duly Convened Shareholder's Meeting
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper discusses legal issues relating to a withdrawal of the duly convened shareholder's meeting in a joint stock company. This paper first introduces recent two conflicting Korean Supreme Court decisions on the notification procedure of the withdrawal of the convened shareholder's meeting. Next, this paper analyzes, in a more comprehensive manner, the issues relating to a withdrawal of the convened shareholders' meeting, i.e., (1) whether the withdrawal is ever allowed after dispatching the convention notice, (2) if allowed, how long and in which form a notice of a withdrawal shall be made under the Korean Commercial Code, (3) whether a resolution at a shareholders' meeting is valid if such resolution is made after the illegitimate withdrawal notice is sent out, and (4) whether and when a director(s) may breach his/her fiduciary duty in connection with a withdrawal of the convened shareholders' meeting. After and based upon all this analysis, this paper finally evaluates two conflicting Supreme Court decisions.
Abstract
This paper discusses legal issues relating to a withdrawal of the duly convened shareholder's meeting in a joint stock company. This paper first introduces recent two conflicting Korean Supreme Court decisions on the notification procedure of the withdrawal of the convened shareholder's meeting. Next, this paper analyzes, in a more comprehensive manner, the issues relating to a withdrawal of the convened shareholders' meeting, i.e., (1) whether the withdrawal is ever allowed after dispatching the convention notice, (2) if allowed, how long and in which form a notice of a withdrawal shall be made under the Korean Commercial Code, (3) whether a resolution at a shareholders' meeting is valid if such resolution is made after the illegitimate withdrawal notice is sent out, and (4) whether and when a director(s) may breach his/her fiduciary duty in connection with a withdrawal of the convened shareholders' meeting. After and based upon all this analysis, this paper finally evaluates two conflicting Supreme Court decisions.
참고문헌 (16)
- 곽윤직, "민법주해(Ⅱ)" (1992), 박영사
- 김교창, "주주총회의 운영(제3개정판)" (2010), 육법사
- 손주찬, "주석상법(회사법 3)" (2003), 한국사법행정학회
- 이철송, "회사법강의(제18판)" (2010), 박영사
- 정동윤, "상법(상)(제4판)" (2009), 법문사
- 최기원, "상법학신론(상)(제18판)" (2009), 박영사
- 김현용, "법인이나 법인 아닌 사단에서 총회소집권자가 이미 소집한 총회의 개최를 연기하거나 소집을 철회·취소할 수 있는 경우 및 법인이나 법인 아닌 사단의 총회소집권자가 총회의 소집을 철회·취소함에 있어 반드시 소집과 동일한 방법으로 구성원들에게 통지하여야 하는지 여부(2007.4.12. 선고 2006다77593 판결", 대법원판례해설, (67) (2007)
- 江頭憲治郞, "株式會社法(第3版)" (2010), 有斐閣
- 大參忠夫, "注釋會社法(4)" (1968), 有斐閣
- 東京弁護士會會社法部, "新株主總會ガイドライン" (2007), 商事法
- 上柳克郞, "新版注釋會社法(5)" (1986), 有斐閣
- 商事法務硏究會, "株主總會實務全書1" (1993), 商事法務硏究會
- 神田秀樹, "會社法(제13판)" (2010), 弘文堂
- 田中耕太郞, "株式會社法講座 第三卷" (1956), 有斐閣
- 田中誠二竝木俊, "新版株式會社法律實務ハンドブック" (1965), 有信堂
- 代表取締役は取締役會の決議に基づかずに株主總會の撤回通知をなせるか, "法學硏究(慶応義塾大學)", 1966, ~