선하증권상 FIO 특약의 개념과 효력 - 대법원 2010.4.15.선고 2007다50649판결을 중심으로-
A Study on the meaning and validity of FIO clause in the Bill of Lading
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
FIO terms are widely used in the voyage charter parties in Korean practices. Under the FIO terms, several issues are raised. The first issue is whether the shipowner's liability to load and discharge is shifted to the charterer or not. In the Korean Supreme Court case 2010.4.15. Docket No. 2007da50649, the Court accepted that the liability of the carrier (shipowner) to load, stow and discharge is shifted to the charterer. The second issue is whether the FIO terms is null and void because it makes the carrier less liable than the Korean Commercial Code Art. 795 and thus it is against the obligatory provision of Art. 799, which is equivalent to Hague-Visby Rules Art. 3(8). In the above case, the Court rendered that it was not against Art. 799. The authors address legal issues of FIO term and analyse the judgment of the above Korean Supreme Court on the meaning of FIO term and submit a proposal for improving the legal status of the FIO term in the Korean Commercial Code.
Abstract
FIO terms are widely used in the voyage charter parties in Korean practices. Under the FIO terms, several issues are raised. The first issue is whether the shipowner's liability to load and discharge is shifted to the charterer or not. In the Korean Supreme Court case 2010.4.15. Docket No. 2007da50649, the Court accepted that the liability of the carrier (shipowner) to load, stow and discharge is shifted to the charterer. The second issue is whether the FIO terms is null and void because it makes the carrier less liable than the Korean Commercial Code Art. 795 and thus it is against the obligatory provision of Art. 799, which is equivalent to Hague-Visby Rules Art. 3(8). In the above case, the Court rendered that it was not against Art. 799. The authors address legal issues of FIO term and analyse the judgment of the above Korean Supreme Court on the meaning of FIO term and submit a proposal for improving the legal status of the FIO term in the Korean Commercial Code.
참고문헌 (24)
- 김인현, "해상법" (2011), 법문사
- 김인현, "해상법연구" (2003), 삼우사
- 김인현, "해상법연구 II" (2008), 삼우사
- 배병태, "주석 해상법" (1982), 사법행정학회
- 박용섭, "해상법" (1994), 형설출판사
- 송상현, "해상법원론" (1993), 박영사
- 서울지방법원, "국제거래상사소송의 실무", ~ (1997)
- 이균성, "신 해상법대계" (2010), KMI
- 이주흥, "해상운송법" (1992), 박영사
- 정영석, "국제해상운송법" (2004), 범한서적주식회사
- 배병태, "주석해상법" (1980), 사법행정학회
- "최종현" (2009), 박영사
- 채이식, "상법IV" (2001), 박영사
- 김인현, "引渡指示書(D", O)와 貨物先取保證狀(L, 한국해법학회지, pp.2011, 33(1)[DOI]
- 김인현, "FIO 契約條件과 그 有效性 및 船上度의 法律關係", 상사판례연구, 19(1), pp.157~185 (2006), 한국상사판례학회
- 문광명, "FIO 특약과 船上渡 - 대법원 2004. 10. 15. 선고 2004다2137 판결의 평석", 한국해법학회지, 29(1), pp.83~102 (2007), 한국해법학회
- 유중원, "航海傭船契約에서 FIO 특약(조건)과 船上渡의 법리 연구", 인권과 정의, (394), pp.128~142 (2009), 대한변호사협회
- 최종현, "선하증권상의 FIO조항의 효력", 법조, 56(2), pp.82~144 (2007), 법조협회
- 落合誠一, "海法大系" (2003), 商事法務
- 戶田, "國際海上物品運送法" (1997), 靑林書院
- Julian Cooke, "VOYAGE CHARTERS" (2007), Informa
- "Scrutton on Charterparties", Sweet & Maxwell
- John F Wilson, "CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA" (2004), PEARSON Longman
- 田中庸介, "FIOST 條項效力", 海事法硏究會誌 (2004)