국제도산절차와 병행도산 - 2006년 일본 麻布(Azabu)건물 주식회사 도산사건을 중심으로 -
Cross-Border Insolvency and Concurrent Proceedings
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In Korea, from 2006, the new era of bankruptcy law governing international insolvency began. The previous three bankruptcy laws - Bankruptcy Act, Composition Act, and Corporate Reorganization Act - have been merged into, and were replaced by, the Debtor Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy Act of Korea. One of the most important changes on the Act (DRBAK) is the introduction of “universalism” of an international insolvency part. Although Korea established new universalism system with respect to international insolvency problems, the research and the study of effects and values of new system is still necessary. Cross-border insolvency cases can involve either a single case where the debtor's assets are located in multiple jurisdictions or the insolvency of multiple members of a cross-border group resulting in concurrent insolvency proceedings in multiple jurisdictions. In both scenarios, perhaps the main point of legal tension and complexity arises from the fact that fundamental principles of national sovereignty prevent a bankruptcy court in one jurisdiction from compelling the application of its law in another jurisdiction. Consequently, courts must rely on international comity to give effect to their rulings that affect parties and assets outside their jurisdiction. This Paper introduces international insolvency law regime, especially Japanese case involving cooperation and coordination of concurrent proceedings. Secondly, by comparing U.S. Bankruptcy Code Chapter 15 and Japanese Law of cooperation and coordination of concurrent proceedings under Korean legal system, the Paper proposes that international suitability and global fitness in international insolvency regime in Korea.
Abstract
In Korea, from 2006, the new era of bankruptcy law governing international insolvency began. The previous three bankruptcy laws - Bankruptcy Act, Composition Act, and Corporate Reorganization Act - have been merged into, and were replaced by, the Debtor Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy Act of Korea. One of the most important changes on the Act (DRBAK) is the introduction of “universalism” of an international insolvency part. Although Korea established new universalism system with respect to international insolvency problems, the research and the study of effects and values of new system is still necessary. Cross-border insolvency cases can involve either a single case where the debtor's assets are located in multiple jurisdictions or the insolvency of multiple members of a cross-border group resulting in concurrent insolvency proceedings in multiple jurisdictions. In both scenarios, perhaps the main point of legal tension and complexity arises from the fact that fundamental principles of national sovereignty prevent a bankruptcy court in one jurisdiction from compelling the application of its law in another jurisdiction. Consequently, courts must rely on international comity to give effect to their rulings that affect parties and assets outside their jurisdiction. This Paper introduces international insolvency law regime, especially Japanese case involving cooperation and coordination of concurrent proceedings. Secondly, by comparing U.S. Bankruptcy Code Chapter 15 and Japanese Law of cooperation and coordination of concurrent proceedings under Korean legal system, the Paper proposes that international suitability and global fitness in international insolvency regime in Korea.
참고문헌 (40)
- 김상수, "일본의 민사재생법과 시사점", 비교사법, 9(4), pp.~24 (2002), 한국비교사법학회
- 金載亨, "統合 倒産法案의 主要爭點", 비교사법, 10(1)통권 : 20, pp.38~76 (2003), 한국비교사법학회
- 김형두, "한국 국제도산법의 발전방향", 국제거래법연구 (2001), 국제거래법학회
- 박준, "국제적 회사정리를 둘러싼 제문제, In 민사판례연구(ⅩⅥ)" (1994), 박영사
- 석광현, "국제사법과 국제소송 - 제3권" (2004), 박영사
- 석광현, "채무자회생 및 파산에 관한 법률(이른바 통합도산법)에 따른 국제도산법", 국제거래법연구, 15(2), pp.319~384 (2006), 국제거래법학회
- 석광현, "통합도산법시안 중 국제도산법에 관한 의견", 법률신문, 법률신문사, ~ (2003)
- 석광현, "유럽연합의 국제도산법제", 국제사법연구, (7) (2002), 한국국제사법학회
- 석광현, "국제도산법에 관한 연구-입법론을 중심으로", 통상법률, 통권 : 39 (2001), 법무부
- 한충수, "UNCITRAL의 국제도산절차 Model Law 연구 -외국도산절차의 승인 및 집행을 중심으로", 민사소송, 7(2), pp.526~568 (2003), 한국민사소송법학회
- 임치용, "파산법연구" (2004), 박영사
- 임치용, "파산법연구2" (2006), 박영사
- 임치용, "파산법연구3" (2010), 박영사
- 최준선, "국제거래법, 제6판" (2009), 삼영사
- 石黒一憲, "国際倒産 vs. 国際課税 - 抵触法的考察" (2010), 信山社
- 片山英二, "並行倒産の意義", 金融·商事判例, (112) (2001), 経済法令研究会
- 坂井秀行, "日米にまたがる麻布建物㈱にみる～承認援助手続と国際並行倒産", 事業再生と債権管理, (127) (2010), 金融財政事情研究会
- 菅家忠行, "外国倒産処理手続の承認援助に関する法律及び民事再生法等の一部を改正する法律(国際倒産関係規定)の概要", 国際商事法務, 통권 : 463 (2001), 国際商事法研究所
- 高木新二郎, "倒産法の改正と運用" (2000), 商事法務研究会
- 田頭章一, "国際倒産法制について, In 別冊『ジュリスト』163号 (倒産判例百選, 第3版)" (2002), 有斐閣
- 竹内康二, "国際倒産法の構築と展望" (1994), 成文堂
- 深山卓也, "新しい国際倒産法制" (2001), 金融財政事情研究会
- 松下涼一, "承認の効果", 金融·商事判例, (1112) (2001), 経済法令研究会
- 山本和彦, "国際倒産法制" (2002), 商事法務
- 山本和彦, "外国倒産処理手続の承認援助法について(1)", ジュリスト, (1194) (2001), 有斐閣
- 山本克己, "国内倒産處理手績や他の承認援助手績との競合", 金融·商事判例, (1112) (2001), 経済法令研究会
- 貝瀬幸雄, "国際倒産法と比較法" (2003), 有斐閣
- Kevin J. Beckering, "United States Cross-Border Corporate Insolvency: The Impact of Chapter 15 on Comity and the New Legal Environment", L. & Bus. Rev. Am, 14, pp.281~ (2008)
- Evelyn H. Biery, "A Look at Transnational Insolvencies and Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005", B.C. L. Rev, 47, pp.23~ (2005)
- Samuel L. Bufford, "International Insolven" (2001), Federal Judicial Center
- John J. Chung, "The New Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code: A Step Toward Erosion of National Sovereignty", Nw. J. Int’l. L. & Bus, 27, pp.89~ (2007)
- Ian F. Fletcher, "Insolvency In Private International Law (2nd Ed.)" (2005), Oxford Univ. Press
- Lynn M. LoPucki, "Cooperation in International Bankruptcy: A Post-Universalist Approach", Cornell L. Rev, 84, pp.696~ (1999)
- Kurt A. Mayr, "Enforcing Prepackaged Restructurings of Foreign Debtors under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code", Am. Bankr. Inst. L. Rev, 14, pp.469~ (2006)
- Robert K. Rasmussen, "A New Approach To Transnational Insolvencies", Mich. J. Int'l L, 19, pp.1~ (1997)
- Bob Wessels, "International Insolvency Law" (2006), Kluwer
- Jay Lawrence Westbrook, "Chapter 15 At Last", Am. Bankr. L.J, 79, pp.713~ (2005)
- Jay Lawrence Westbrook, "Multinational Enterprise in General Default: Chapter 15, The ALI Principles, and The EU Insolvency Regulations", Am. Bankr. L.J, 76, pp.1~ (2002)
- Jay Lawrence Westbrook, "A Global Solution to Multinational Default", Mich. L. Rev, 98, pp.2276~ (2000)
- Paul H Zumbro, "Cross-Border Insolvencies and International Protocols - An Imperfect But Effective Tool", Bus. L. Int'l, 11(2), pp.157~ (2010)