오픈 소스 소프트웨어의 법적 문제에 대한 검토
Review on the legal problems of Open Source Software
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
By 2011 estimation of Korean IDC, the 2010’s scale of open source software(OSS) in the domestic market reached about 15 billions won. Furthermore, the scale of domestic IT market is expected to grow about 21.5billion won. Though we can use this OSS freely. we are careful to the use of OSS. Because if we uncarefully use OSS, we can violate the OSS license and the intellectual right law. Therefore, I will study on the content of OSS license. If we are not observe this license, I can predict the fact that many disputes occur. Then, I will inspire on the legal problem of OSS. Firstly, I think that OSS is the second intellectual goods and joint intellectual goods. But I will doubt about the fact of intellectual goods related on the business. On the this point, we will study carefully. Secondly, Who are the owner of the intellectual right? It is obvious that Orignal intellectual right holder and secondary intellectual right holder etc are the intellectual right owner. But I think that the OSS community is not the intellectual right holder. But I think that OSS community need to go to court for the orignal holder and secondary holder, etc. Thirdly, in case of infringement on the intellectual right of OSS, A programer, seller, end-user etc become the counter party of lawsuit. But related on the seller and end-user, in spite of they having no ideas on the fact of infringement on the intellectual right, they must have responsibility on the infringement on the intellectual right, unconditionally. But I think that I need to interpret their responsibility restrictively. And lastly, I believed the facts that joint tort can be formed in relation to on the OSS. But I think that it is difficult to specify the one who act the joint tort.
Abstract
By 2011 estimation of Korean IDC, the 2010’s scale of open source software(OSS) in the domestic market reached about 15 billions won. Furthermore, the scale of domestic IT market is expected to grow about 21.5billion won. Though we can use this OSS freely. we are careful to the use of OSS. Because if we uncarefully use OSS, we can violate the OSS license and the intellectual right law. Therefore, I will study on the content of OSS license. If we are not observe this license, I can predict the fact that many disputes occur. Then, I will inspire on the legal problem of OSS. Firstly, I think that OSS is the second intellectual goods and joint intellectual goods. But I will doubt about the fact of intellectual goods related on the business. On the this point, we will study carefully. Secondly, Who are the owner of the intellectual right? It is obvious that Orignal intellectual right holder and secondary intellectual right holder etc are the intellectual right owner. But I think that the OSS community is not the intellectual right holder. But I think that OSS community need to go to court for the orignal holder and secondary holder, etc. Thirdly, in case of infringement on the intellectual right of OSS, A programer, seller, end-user etc become the counter party of lawsuit. But related on the seller and end-user, in spite of they having no ideas on the fact of infringement on the intellectual right, they must have responsibility on the infringement on the intellectual right, unconditionally. But I think that I need to interpret their responsibility restrictively. And lastly, I believed the facts that joint tort can be formed in relation to on the OSS. But I think that it is difficult to specify the one who act the joint tort.
참고문헌 (25)
- 김병일, "오픈소스 라이선스 위반과 저작권침해", 계간 저작권, 22(2), pp.4~24 (2009), 한국저작권위원회
- 국내 SW커뮤니티 현황 및 활동 분석 : Open Source커큐니티를 중심으로, "김유중", ~ (2008)
- 박성호, "업무상작성한 저작물의 저작권 귀속", 변호사, 21 (1991), 서울지방변호사회
- 박현경, "업무상저작물의 저작자의 지위에 관한 연구", 영산법률논총, 7(2) (2010), 영산대학교 법률연구소
- 염호준, "한미자유무역협정에 따른 일시적 복제에 대한 검토", Law & Technology, 5(3) (2009), 서울대 기술과 법 센터
- 오승종, "저작권법" (2009), 박영사
- 임원선, "일시적 복제의 보호 입법에 관한 연구", 계간 저작권, 24(1), pp.4~26 (2011), 한국저작권위원회
- 문화심의회 저작권분과회 보고서, "일본 문화심의회 저작권분과회", ~ (2006)
- 정보통신부, "오픈 소스 SW 라이선스 가이드라인", ~
- 정진근, "공개소프트웨어의 법적 해석에 관한 연구 : GNU GPL을 중심으로", 박사, 법학, pp.2004
- 田村善之, "知的財産法(第3版)" (2003), 有斐閣
- 井上正, "オープン·ソ\ース·ソ\フトウエアと著作権", パテント, 57(9) (2004), 日本弁理士会
- 作花文雄, "詳解著作權法" (2002), ぎょうっせい
- "Legal Aspect of Free and Open Source Software"[URL]
- "A&M Records v. Napster, Inc.", 114 F. supp. 2d, 896(N.D.Cal.), ~ (2000)
- "Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc., et al. v. Grokster, Ltd.", C.d.Cal., ~ (2003)
- "The Cartoon Network v. CSC Holdings, Inc", 536 F3d 121 (2d Cir), ~ (2008)
- "William v. Weisser", 273 Cal. App. 2d 726, 78 Cal. Rptr. 542, ~ (1969)
