생명공학의 남용위험과 형법적 규제
The Risk of Biotechnology and Criminological Regulation of Biotechnological Risk
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Nowadays the development of biotechnology is so rapid that the law on this field could not cope up with the newest problems of bio- technology. In this field the basic law is Act on Bioethics and Safety in 2005. This act provides many clauses on the prohibition of human cloning and regulation on the human embryo research. But these days public opinion on human-animal hybrids changes to be permissible to cure rare diseases. In dealing with biotechnology or medical treatment, many ethical and legal problems imply a dilemma between moral duty and the resulting profit, present the issue of how to regulate ethical matters with laws. This essay reviews the legal problems of risk involved in biotechnlogical research and management of the risk. Firstly, the risk of biotechnology are discussed. Secondly, the specific problems of current Act on Bioethics and Safety(2005) in Korea. Lastly, the vary measures and laws are available to prevent human and minimize dangerousness in biotechnology area and desirable and efficient risk management skills and method has been addressed. The legal control on risky biotechnology research is necessary to protect human dignity. But, many pro-research scientists stand against it. They asserts that biotechnlogical research will be helpful to cure human diseases that have so far defied cures, such as type 1 diabetes, the Alzheimer's disease, and the Parkinson's disease. But pro-life group asserts that biotechnological research should be prohibited to secure human dignity. In this paper I propose dialogue between law and science. So the law in this field should protect the conditions of resonable dialogue among various social groups including pro-research, pro-life group and prescriptivists. In this dialogue only resonable and probable opinion will be supported by the participants and this opinion will be enforced by the name of law.
Abstract
Nowadays the development of biotechnology is so rapid that the law on this field could not cope up with the newest problems of bio- technology. In this field the basic law is Act on Bioethics and Safety in 2005. This act provides many clauses on the prohibition of human cloning and regulation on the human embryo research. But these days public opinion on human-animal hybrids changes to be permissible to cure rare diseases. In dealing with biotechnology or medical treatment, many ethical and legal problems imply a dilemma between moral duty and the resulting profit, present the issue of how to regulate ethical matters with laws. This essay reviews the legal problems of risk involved in biotechnlogical research and management of the risk. Firstly, the risk of biotechnology are discussed. Secondly, the specific problems of current Act on Bioethics and Safety(2005) in Korea. Lastly, the vary measures and laws are available to prevent human and minimize dangerousness in biotechnology area and desirable and efficient risk management skills and method has been addressed. The legal control on risky biotechnology research is necessary to protect human dignity. But, many pro-research scientists stand against it. They asserts that biotechnlogical research will be helpful to cure human diseases that have so far defied cures, such as type 1 diabetes, the Alzheimer's disease, and the Parkinson's disease. But pro-life group asserts that biotechnological research should be prohibited to secure human dignity. In this paper I propose dialogue between law and science. So the law in this field should protect the conditions of resonable dialogue among various social groups including pro-research, pro-life group and prescriptivists. In this dialogue only resonable and probable opinion will be supported by the participants and this opinion will be enforced by the name of law.
참고문헌 (24)
- Report on Human Genetic Database: Challenges and Opportunities, "House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology", HL57, ~, pp.HL57 (2000)
- Jonalhan Kimmerlman, "Medical Research, Risk, and Bystanders", IRB: Ethics and Human Research, 27(4) (2005)
- M. D. Eppelt, "Grundverzicht und Humangenetik" (1998)
- National Research Council, "Understanding Risk" (1996)
- O'Neill, "Trust and Autonomy in Biotechnology" (2002)
- "WHO Guidance on Xenogeneic Infection", Disease Surveillance and Response: A Strategy for International Cooperation and Coordi- nation, 2001
- 김동광, "생명공학의 위험구조", 문화과학, (35) (2003)
- 김선택, "출생전 인간생명의 헌법적 보호", 헌법논총, 16 (2005)
- 김일수, "착상이전단계에서 배아생명보호", 형사법연구, (16) (2006)
- 김재윤, "현대형법의 위기와 과제" (2009), 전남대학교출판부
- 김현철, "과학기술의 발전과 가족법의 대응. In: 생명윤리 관련 법령의 입법적 과제 - 가족 문제를 포함하여", 한국가족법학회 2007년 하계학술대회 자료집 (2007)
- 김혜경, "생명윤리에 관한 입법상의 문제점", 법학논총, 17 (2007), 숭실대 법학연구소
- 김호기, "생명공학기술의 사용과 위험평가 및 위험관린", 생명윤리정책연구, 2(2), pp.105~122 (2008), 생명의료법연구소
- 박강우, "위험형법론" (2008), 한국학술정보
- 박강우, "인간배아연구의 법적 규제", 과학기술과 법, (창간) (2010), 충북대 법학연구소
- 생명공학남용과 법적 규제를 위한 연구, "신동일", 한국형사정책연구원, ~, pp.연구보고서 02-15 (2002)
- 신동일, "배아생명보호를 위한 형법적 개입의 시기", 형사정책연구 (2002)
- 오세혁, "생명윤리법의 발전에 따른 형사법의 변화", 法學論文集, 32(1), pp.211~239 (2008), 법학연구원
- 원혜욱, "유전자감정결과의 증거사용에 관하여", 형사정책연구, 12(1) (2001)
- 이근창, "보험과 고용에 있어서의 유전자 차별", 과학문화재단 대중심포지움자문회 발표문 (2001)
- 이상돈, "생명공학과 법" (2003), 아카넷
- 이인영, "인간복제 및 인간배아연구와 관련된 처벌규정에 관한 고찰", 비교형사법연구, 4(2), pp.9~260 (2002), 한국비교형사법학회
- 전경운, "생명공학의 위험성에 대한 적절한 규율", 환경법연구, 26(1), pp.277~310 (2004), 한국환경법학회
- 황상익, "생명․과학․정의. In: 생명과학과 연구윤리", 제1회 김옥길기념강좌 자료집, pp.30~ (2001), 이화여대
