본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

국제사법재판소의 권고적 의견에 관한 고찰

A Study on the Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice

최지현
안암법학회 (Anam Law Association)|2015.05|안암법학 (Anam Law Review)|제47호|pp. 373-402|DOI 10.22822/alr..47.201505.373

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

권고적 의견국제사법재판소International Court of JusticeAdvisory OpinionRules of Court상설국제사법재판소ICJ규정ICJ규칙Permanent Court of International JusticeStatute of the International Court of Justice

초록

Advisory Opinion of the ICJ has its own implication on the points that ICJ reveals the exact meaning of international law in the specific situations and shows guidance to the UN body or a specialized agency how to response the international problems and apply international law. Because of its advisory character, Advisory Opinion of the ICJ does not have legal binding force. It only functions as a recommendatory one. But under the same umbrella of the UN system, a body which requests Advisory Opinion cannot be against the final result of the Advisory procedures. To that effect, it can be said that Advisory Opinion has de facto binding force within and to UN bodies. Viewed in this perspective, it raises serious questions when Advisory procedures is utilized as a kind of the appeal procedures for international administrative tribunals. So the UN General Assembly repealed the review procedures of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal and renovate the administrative procedures with the two-step justice system without an involvement of the ICJ. In this respect, it is seriously considered to repeal the present review system of the Administrative Tribunal of the ILO.

Abstract

Advisory Opinion of the ICJ has its own implication on the points that ICJ reveals the exact meaning of international law in the specific situations and shows guidance to the UN body or a specialized agency how to response the international problems and apply international law. Because of its advisory character, Advisory Opinion of the ICJ does not have legal binding force. It only functions as a recommendatory one. But under the same umbrella of the UN system, a body which requests Advisory Opinion cannot be against the final result of the Advisory procedures. To that effect, it can be said that Advisory Opinion has de facto binding force within and to UN bodies. Viewed in this perspective, it raises serious questions when Advisory procedures is utilized as a kind of the appeal procedures for international administrative tribunals. So the UN General Assembly repealed the review procedures of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal and renovate the administrative procedures with the two-step justice system without an involvement of the ICJ. In this respect, it is seriously considered to repeal the present review system of the Administrative Tribunal of the ILO.

참고문헌 (43)

  1. Andreas Paulus, "The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary" (2012), Oxford Univ. Press
  2. Andreas Paulus, "The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary" (2012), Oxford Univ. Press
  3. Hermann Mosler, "The Charter of United Nations: A Commentary" (2002), Oxford Univ. Press
  4. Hersch Lauterpacht, "The Development of International Law by the International Court of Justice" (1958), Stevens & Sons Limited
  5. Hugh Thirlway, "The law and Procedure of the International Court of justice Fifty Years of Jurisprudence, Vol. Ⅰ" (2013), Oxford Univ. Press
  6. Hugh Thirlway, "The law and Procedure of the International Court of justice Fifty Years of Jurisprudence, Vol. Ⅱ" (2013), Oxford Univ. Press
  7. I.C.J., "Yearbook of International Law", ~ (2010)
  8. Jachen Abr. Frowein, "The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary" (2012), Oxford Univ. Press
  9. Robert Kolb, "The International Court of Justice" (2013), Hart Publishing
  10. "UN doc. A", RES, pp.1946, ~
  11. "UN doc. A", RES, pp.1947, ~
  12. "UN doc. A", RES, pp.1955, ~
  13. "UN doc. A", RES, pp.1948, ~
  14. "UN doc. A", RES, pp.1949, ~
  15. "UN doc. A", RES, pp.1957, ~
  16. "UN doc. E", 1732, 1950
  17. "UN doc. E", 1732, 1950
  18. "UN doc. A", 45, pp.1990, ~
  19. "UN doc. A", 46, pp.1991, ~
  20. "UN doc. A", 47, 24111, 1992[DOI]
  21. "UN doc. A", RES, 54, 1996[DOI]
  22. "UN doc. A", RES, 261, 2007[DOI]
  23. "UN doc. A", RES, 228, 2007[DOI]
  24. "UN doc. A", RES, 253, 2008[DOI]
  25. "UN doc. A", RES, 54, 1996[DOI]
  26. "UN doc. A", RES, 261, 2007[DOI]
  27. "UN doc. A", RES, 228, 2007[DOI]
  28. "UN doc. A", RES, 253, 2008[DOI]
  29. Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo, , Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports, ~ (2010)
  30. Applicability of Article VI, Section 22, of the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations, , Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports, ~ (1989)
  31. Certain Expenses of the United Nations (Article 17, paragraph 2, of the Charter), , Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports, ~ (1962)
  32. Competence of the General Assembly for the Admission of a State to the United Nations, , Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports, ~ (1950)
  33. Conditions of Admission of a State to Membership in the United Nations (Article 4 of Charter), Advisory Opinion, , I.C.J. Reports, ~ (1948)
  34. Interpretation of Peace Treaties with Bulgaria, Hungary and Romania, First Phase, , Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports, ~ (1950)
  35. Judgments of the Administrative Tribunal of the I.L.O. upon complaints made against the U.N.E.S.C.O., Advisory Opinion of October 23rd, , I.C.J. Reports, ~ (1956)
  36. Judgments of the Administrative Tribunal of the IL0 upon Complaints Made against Unesco, , Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports, ~ (1956)
  37. Legal Consequences cf the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, , Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports, ~ (2004)
  38. Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276 (1970), , Advisory Opinion, I. C.J. Reports, ~ (1971)
  39. Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276 (1970), , Advisory Opinion, I. C.J. Reports, ~ (1971)
  40. Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, , Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports, ~ (1996)
  41. Legality of the Use by a State of Nuclear Weapons in Armed Conflict, , Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports, ~ (1996)
  42. Reservations to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, , Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports, ~ (1951)
  43. "Status of Eastern Carelia, Advisory Opinion", P.C..I.J., Series B, No. 5, ~ (1923)

관련 논문AI추천

ICJ의 권고적 관할권과 국가 간 분쟁오승진법학연구원 · 법학논총2013 · 제37권 제4호국제사법법원(ICJ)의 재판관할권 행사동향박현석법학연구원 · 법학논총2007 · 제24권 제3호코소보의 일방적 독립 선언의 국제법상 허용 가능성에 관한 ICJ 권고적 의견에 대한 검토이성덕중앙법학회 · 중앙법학2010 · 제12권 제4호분쟁해결을 위한 대체적 수단으로서 ITLOS 권고적 의견 절차 활용- SRFC 권고적 의견 사건(사건번호 21)을 중심으로 -최지현한국해양과학기술원 · Ocean and Polar Research2022 · 제44권 제2호국제사법재판소의 정치문제에 관한 결정과 법적 분쟁과의 구별이주윤사단법인 법조협회 · 법조2023 · 제72권 제5호국제법상 연성법의 재인식정경수안암법학회 · 안암법학2011 · 제34호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)

2014년 주요 행정법(행정) 판결의 분석과 비판에 관한 소고김중권pp. 1-59토지 점유자, 매도인, 임대인의 과실 불법행위 책임 - 미국 불법행위 보통법전집 제2판의 규정을 중심으로 -고세일pp. 61-110유전자원 접근 및 이익공유에 관한 나고야 의정서의 주요 과제에 대한 법적 분석정명현, 박노형, 이선pp. 111-142보험자의 정보제공의무에 관한 영국, 독일 및 유럽보험계약법 준칙의 비교 분석에 관한 연구 － 우리 상법상의 약관설명의무를 비교대상으로 하여 －박세민pp. 143-187OECD 다국적기업 가이드라인의 이의제기 절차와 국내연락사무소의 역할배연재pp. 189-222
원문 보기