저작권침해 어플리케이션을 판매하는 앱스토어의 책임
Liability of the Appstore that Sells Copyright-infringing Application
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The sale of applications on the APP Store is keep growing rapidly and worldwidely and the damages of copyrighters are going to be increased enormously. However, as we see that the most of the people who infringe copyrights are people lack of assets or small IT firms who cannot afford the compensations, it is not enough to protect the copyrighters by charging them after the infringement has happened. And the illegal application softwares are distributed by the APP Store on the internet so it is the best policy to charge the APP Store to claim for damages. The problem is whether we can charge the APP Store as the Online Service Provider. The APP Store is an OSP which provides storage service, because it circulates the applications by saving the programs as the inventor requires. Korean copyright law does not have a general provision of an OSP liabilities but the safe harbor provision, so the precedents acknowledge the OSP liabilites by backing the illegal act. But recently the judicial cases acknowledge the OSP liabilities in the open market narrowly. And the APP Store has a very similar structure to the open market, so these judicial cases will be applied to the APP Store either. Therefore, it is difficult to charge the OSP liabilities to the APP Store when we follow the precedents. By the Korean copyright law article 103, when the APP Store follow the Notice and takedown action, the OSP liabilites on the damages arosed after the NTD will be removed. The damages before the NTD action still be in charge by the backing, but we should cure the copyrighter's damages by the OSP to protect the copyright. So the APP Store will compensate to the infringed copyrighters first, and then the APP Store can claim the indemnity to the illegals. And eventually, the new kind of dangers in the mobile technology should be managed by the insurance.
Abstract
The sale of applications on the APP Store is keep growing rapidly and worldwidely and the damages of copyrighters are going to be increased enormously. However, as we see that the most of the people who infringe copyrights are people lack of assets or small IT firms who cannot afford the compensations, it is not enough to protect the copyrighters by charging them after the infringement has happened. And the illegal application softwares are distributed by the APP Store on the internet so it is the best policy to charge the APP Store to claim for damages. The problem is whether we can charge the APP Store as the Online Service Provider. The APP Store is an OSP which provides storage service, because it circulates the applications by saving the programs as the inventor requires. Korean copyright law does not have a general provision of an OSP liabilities but the safe harbor provision, so the precedents acknowledge the OSP liabilites by backing the illegal act. But recently the judicial cases acknowledge the OSP liabilities in the open market narrowly. And the APP Store has a very similar structure to the open market, so these judicial cases will be applied to the APP Store either. Therefore, it is difficult to charge the OSP liabilities to the APP Store when we follow the precedents. By the Korean copyright law article 103, when the APP Store follow the Notice and takedown action, the OSP liabilites on the damages arosed after the NTD will be removed. The damages before the NTD action still be in charge by the backing, but we should cure the copyrighter's damages by the OSP to protect the copyright. So the APP Store will compensate to the infringed copyrighters first, and then the APP Store can claim the indemnity to the illegals. And eventually, the new kind of dangers in the mobile technology should be managed by the insurance.
참고문헌 (28)
- 공영일, "스마트폰의 함의와 시사점", 방송통신정책, 22(4), pp.1~22 (2010), 정보통신정책연구원
- 남효순, "인터넷상에서 행해진 제3자의 불법행위에 대한 온라인서비스제공자의 책임, In 인터넷과 법률", pp.543~ (2002), 인터넷과 법률
- 박준석, "온라인서비스제공자의 저작권 침해책임에 관한 한국에서의 입법 및 판례 분석", 창작과 권리, (63), pp.106~133 (2011), 세창출판사
- 스마트폰 시대의 소프트웨어 해외 진출 전략 연구, "유지은", 정보통신산업진흥원, ~ (2009)
- 윤종민, "디지털저작권 보호와 온라인서비스제공자의 책임", 창작과 권리, (63), pp.134~174 (2011), 세창출판사
- 이도구, "스마트폰에서의 저작권 침해 현황", 제4회 저작권포럼 (2010), 한국저작권위원회
- 전응준, "해외 앱스토어 권리구제방안", 제4회 저작권포럼 (2010), 한국저작권위원회
- 한국저작권위원회 기술연구소, "스마트폰과 저작권- 아이폰사례를 중심으로", 저작권기술 동향 Biweekly (2010)
- OPEN MARKET에서의 상표권 침해에 대한 보호방안 연구, "대한상표협회", 특허청, ~ (2011)
- 문화부, "개정 저작권법 해설", ~ (2007)
- 문화체육관광부, "한-EU FTA 이행 개정 저작권법 해설", ~ (2011)
- 강신하, "저작권법: 이론과 실무" (2010), 진원사
- 류종현, "온라인 저작권" (2011), 한울아카데미
- 박준석, "인터넷서비스제공자의 책임" (2005), 박영사
- 사법연수원, "저작권법", ~ (2009)
- 송영식, "저작권법 개설 (제6판)" (2010), 세창출판사
- 신창섭, "국제사법" (2011), 세창출판사
- 오승종, "(2007년 시행 개정법률에 따른)저작권법" (2007), 박영사
- 이규호, "저작권법(개정판)" (2011), 진원사
- 이대희, "인터넷과 지적재산권법" (2002), 박영사
- 남형두, "저작권법 주해" (2007), 박영사
- 유병현, "민사소송법 제3판 보정판" (2010), 법문사
- Bäaumer, "Napster, Gnutella, Kazaa and Beyond" (2004), CRi
- Christian Ahlert, "How ‘Liberty’ Disap- peared from Cyberspace: The Mystery Shopper Tests Internet Content Self-Regulation, Centre for Socio-Legal Studies" (2004), Oxford University
- Ian C. Ballon, "Dmca Liability Limitations for Social Networks, Blogs, Websites and Other Service Providers, Excerpted from Chapter 4 (Copyright Protection) of E-Commerce and Internet Law: A Legal Treatise with Forms, Second Edition", PLI, 2009, pp.978, 641~
- Jane C. Ginsburg, "Separating The Sony Sheep from The Grokster Goats: Reckoning The Future Business Plans of Copyright- Dependent Technology Entrepreneurs", Arizona Law Review, 50, pp.577~ (2008)
- Mike Scott, "Safe Harbors under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act", N.Y.U. J. LEGIS. & PUB. POL'S, 9, pp.99~ (2005)
- Raymond T. Nimmer, "Law of Computer Technology", Z (Database updated April 2011), ~ (2011)