로테르담 규칙상 중재합의에 관한 법적 검토
Legal Research on Arbitration Agreement under the Rotterdam Rules
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The newly adopted Rotterdam Rules in 2008 by UN has a substantive provisions on arbitration while allowing the cargo claimant to choose where it takes place. A distinction is also made between liner trade and non-liner trade. It was recognised that in non-liner trade ‘recurse to arbitration under charterparties and charterparty bills of lading was not common’, whereas the liner industry ‘had never made broad use of arbitration’. Article 75 permits the parties to refer any dispute that may arise relating to the carriage of goods under the Rotterdam Rules to arbitration. The key question is where that arbitration takes place. To a large extent mirroring the provisions on court jurisdiction, Chapter 15 again draws a distinction between volume contract and other contracts. The parties may agree to resolve a dispute by arbitration in any place after a dispute has arisen. Article 76 provides that nothing in the Rotterdam Rules affects the enforceability of an arbitration clause in a contract of carriage in non-liner transportation to which the Rotterdam Rules apply either because of article 7 of the Rules or because the parties have voluntarily incorporated them into a contract to which the Rules would not otherwise apply. However, if the Rotterdam Rules apply to a transport document or electronic transport record in non-liner transportation under article 7 of the Rules, an arbitration agreement in that contract will be subject to Chapter 15, unless it identifies the parties to and the date of the charterparty or other contract excluded from the application of the rules under Article 6; and incorporates by specific reference the clause in the charterparty or other contract that contains the terms of the arbitration agreement.
Abstract
The newly adopted Rotterdam Rules in 2008 by UN has a substantive provisions on arbitration while allowing the cargo claimant to choose where it takes place. A distinction is also made between liner trade and non-liner trade. It was recognised that in non-liner trade ‘recurse to arbitration under charterparties and charterparty bills of lading was not common’, whereas the liner industry ‘had never made broad use of arbitration’. Article 75 permits the parties to refer any dispute that may arise relating to the carriage of goods under the Rotterdam Rules to arbitration. The key question is where that arbitration takes place. To a large extent mirroring the provisions on court jurisdiction, Chapter 15 again draws a distinction between volume contract and other contracts. The parties may agree to resolve a dispute by arbitration in any place after a dispute has arisen. Article 76 provides that nothing in the Rotterdam Rules affects the enforceability of an arbitration clause in a contract of carriage in non-liner transportation to which the Rotterdam Rules apply either because of article 7 of the Rules or because the parties have voluntarily incorporated them into a contract to which the Rules would not otherwise apply. However, if the Rotterdam Rules apply to a transport document or electronic transport record in non-liner transportation under article 7 of the Rules, an arbitration agreement in that contract will be subject to Chapter 15, unless it identifies the parties to and the date of the charterparty or other contract excluded from the application of the rules under Article 6; and incorporates by specific reference the clause in the charterparty or other contract that contains the terms of the arbitration agreement.
참고문헌 (42)
- 목영준, "상사중재법" (2011), 박영사
- 석광현, "국제사법과 국제소송 제4권" (2007), 박영사
- 석광현, "국제사법과 국제소송(제2권, 제3권)" (2001), 박영사
- 양병회, "주석 중재법", 대한상사중재원, ~ (2006)
- 강수미, "중재의 대상적격의 의의 및 내용", 중재연구, 19(1), pp.3~24 (2009), 한국중재학회
- 강이수, "선하증권과 중재합의의 효력", 중재연구, 12(2), pp.303~336 (2003), 한국중재학회
- 김상만, "계약 및 중재합의 유효성의 소송 대상적격성에 대한 미국 연방대법원의 입장에 관한 연구- 미국 연방대법원의 Buckeye Check Cashing v. Cardegna(2006) 판례를 중심으로 -", 동아법학, (50), pp.417~445 (2011), 법학연구소
- 김인현, "로테르담 규칙상 분쟁해결절차로서의 중재제도", 경영법률, 22(4), pp.403~429 (2012), 한국경영법률학회
- 김인현, "2008년 로테르담 규칙상 裁判管轄制度의 성립 과정과 내용 - 전속적 합의관할을 중심으로 -", 한국해법학회지, 32(1), pp.191~235 (2010), 한국해법학회
- 김인현, "제20차 운시트랄 운송법회의 보고서", 한국해법학회지, 30(1) (2008)
- 김지석, "선택적 중재합의의 유효성", 재산법연구, 28(2), pp.355~376 (2011), 한국재산법학회
- 김지홍, "중재합의의 제3자에 대한 효력", 중재연구, 17(3), pp.101~119 (2007), 한국중재학회
- 김홍규, "중재판정의 국적, In 법사상과 민사법(춘제 현승종박사 화갑기념)" (1979), 국민서관
- 목영준, "중재에 있어서 법원의 역할에 관한 연구", 박사, 법학, pp.2005
- 서영화, "용선계약의 선하증권에의 편입", 한국해법회지, 14(1) (1992)
- 석광현, "國際商事仲裁에서 紛爭의 實體에 적용할 準據法―우리 仲裁法의 해석론을 중심으로", 법학논총, 23(1), pp.1~46 (2006), 법학연구소
- 손경한, "중재 자치와 중재의 준거법", 국제사법연구, (17), pp.411~449 (2011), 한국국제사법학회
- 손경한, "중재합의에 대한 새로운 고찰", 중재연구, 23(1), pp.55~85 (2013), 한국중재학회
- 오석웅, "국제상사중재에 있어서 중재지의 의미", 중재연구, 18(3), pp.3~22 (2008), 한국중재학회
- 오석웅, "국제중재절차법과 당사자자치의 원칙 －우리나라 중재법의 해석을 중심으로－", 국제사법연구, (17), pp.451~473 (2011), 한국국제사법학회
- 유중원, "國際海上運送에 있어서 개정 海商法 제855조(傭船契約과 船荷證券)의 법리 연구(下)", 법조, 57(5), pp.130~183 (2008), 법조협회
- 이정원, "로테르담 규칙과 국제재판관할에 관한 고찰", 법조, 60(7)통권 : 658, pp.163~195 (2011), 법조협회
- 이호원, "개정중재법에 관한 소고", 중재, (302) (2001), 대한상사중재원
- 이호원, "외국중재판정의 승인과 집행”, 섭외사건의 제문제(하)", 재판자료, 34 (1986), 법원행정처
- 주기동, "용선계약내용의 선하증권에의 편입", 사법논집, 18 (1987), 법원행정처
- 채동헌, "용선계약상의 중재조항과 선하증권에의 편입, In 대법원판례해설 통권 제44호" (2004), 대법원판례해설
- 최준선, "UNCITRAL 국제(해상)운송법초안의 재판관할조항에 대한 고찰", 한국해법학회지, 28(1), pp.403~431 (2006), 한국해법학회
- Berger, Klaus Peter, "Private Dispute Resolution in International Business: Negotiation, Mediation, Arbitration Vol.2" (2010), Wolters Kluwer
- Born, Gary B, "International Commercial Arbitration in the United States" (2009), Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers
- Garner, Bryan A, "Black's Law Dictionary" (2000)
- Gaskell, Nicholas, "Bills of Lading: Law and Contracts" (2000), LLP Professional Publishing
- Gilmore, Grant, "The Law of Admiralty" (1975), Foundation Press Inc
- Mocatta, Alan Abraham, "Scrutton on Charterparties and Bills of Lading" (1984), Sweet & Maxwell
- Sturley, Michael F, "The Rotterdam Rules -The UN Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea" (2010), Sweet & Maxwell
- Sutton, David S, "Russel on Arbitration" (1997), Sweet & Maxwell
- Tetley, William, "Marine Cargo Claims" (1988), Blais
- Von Ziegler, Alexander, "The Rotterdam Rules 2008 -Commentary to the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea" (2010), Kluwer Law International
- Wilson, John F, "Carriage of Goods by Sea", pp.2008, Pearson
- Anthony Diamond QC, "The Next Sea Carriage Convention?", Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, 2 (2008)
- Baatz, Yvonne, "“Jurisdiction and Arbitration”, The Carriage of Goods by Sea under the Rotterdam Rules" (2010), Lloyd's List
- Hooper, Chester, "“Arbitration”, The Rotterdam Rules 2008" (2010), Wolters Kluwer
- Sturley, M. F., "Modernizing and Reforming U. S. Maritime Law : The Rotterdam Rules in the United States", Texas International Law Journal, (Spring) (2009)