남·북한 형법 통합을 위한 원칙과 방안
Principles and plans for the combined criminal law for South and North Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
South korea, being the only divided country in the nation, is having 67th anniversary of division, and 70th anniversary of independence. Because it has been more than 100 years of confrontation, there are lots of difference in politics, law, economics, cultures, and even languages compare to North at present. In the case of Germany, even though they were divided as almost same period as Korea, they could succeed in unification through the Wall of Berlin in 1990 because they have prepared reunification through the suffering and hardships. Because reunification is a huge historical event that can come anytime and anywhere, we ought to be well prepared for it beforehand, and this also applies to the law field as well as criminal law. Even though they prepared carefully, Germany have spent so much time and work to solve law problem even after 20 years from reunification. Robert Carlin, North Korea expert from CIA, said that unprepared reunification is a disaster for the North and burden for the South, and we know we are not taking any specific actions to succeed in reunification. Accordingly, this paper will talk about principles and plans for the reunification, specifically in the combined criminal law. Generally, there are three types of reunification, gradual unification, sudden unification. and unification through battle. There is no doubt that we try to take gradual unification plan, however, there should be specific steps for the to preparation in combining criminal law. Therefore, This paper will cover the three stages of principles and plans for the unification in the field of criminal law, reconciliation and cooperation stage, South and North alliance stage, and unified nation stage, based on the past unified policies introduced by Roh Tae-woo’s Unification Policy(1989) and Kim Young-sam’s Unification Policy for Global Korean Community(1993)
Abstract
South korea, being the only divided country in the nation, is having 67th anniversary of division, and 70th anniversary of independence. Because it has been more than 100 years of confrontation, there are lots of difference in politics, law, economics, cultures, and even languages compare to North at present. In the case of Germany, even though they were divided as almost same period as Korea, they could succeed in unification through the Wall of Berlin in 1990 because they have prepared reunification through the suffering and hardships. Because reunification is a huge historical event that can come anytime and anywhere, we ought to be well prepared for it beforehand, and this also applies to the law field as well as criminal law. Even though they prepared carefully, Germany have spent so much time and work to solve law problem even after 20 years from reunification. Robert Carlin, North Korea expert from CIA, said that unprepared reunification is a disaster for the North and burden for the South, and we know we are not taking any specific actions to succeed in reunification. Accordingly, this paper will talk about principles and plans for the reunification, specifically in the combined criminal law. Generally, there are three types of reunification, gradual unification, sudden unification. and unification through battle. There is no doubt that we try to take gradual unification plan, however, there should be specific steps for the to preparation in combining criminal law. Therefore, This paper will cover the three stages of principles and plans for the unification in the field of criminal law, reconciliation and cooperation stage, South and North alliance stage, and unified nation stage, based on the past unified policies introduced by Roh Tae-woo’s Unification Policy(1989) and Kim Young-sam’s Unification Policy for Global Korean Community(1993)
참고문헌 (33)
- 김일수, "한국형법Ⅰ" (1992), 박영사
- 박상기, "형법각론" (1994), 박영사
- 이재상, "형법각론" (1990), 박영사
- 김창도, "통일대비 남북한 형사법 비교 연구", 박사, 법학과 형사법전공, pp.2014
- 통일대비 북한 형사법령 통합방안 예비연구, "도중진", 형사정책연구원, ~ (2008)
- 디트린데 알브레히트, "독일통일과 공소시효-개관", 비교형사법연구, 3(2) (2003)
- 박강우, "통일 후 형사정책의 기본방향", 「통일시대의 법제」제59회 안암법학회 추계학술발표회 (2014)
- 박수희, "체제통합에 따른 남북한 형법통합 방안", 한국공안행정학회보, (23), pp.371~406 (2006), 한국공안행정학회
- 박수희, "형법을 통한 통일독일의 구동독 체제불법 청산에 관한 연구", 박사, 법학, pp.2000
- 북한의 각급 인민회의대원선거법에 관한 연구, "박정원", 법제처, ~ (2009)
- 백학순, "신변안전보장협정", 통일경제, ~ (1999)
- 신영호, "북한의 개성공업지구법 및 금강산관광지구법의 제문제" (2003), 법무부
- 통일대비 북한범죄자 처리방안에 관한 연구, "신의기", 형사정책연구원, ~ (2009)
- 심재무, "독일통일조약에 따른 형법상의 문제", 형사정책연구, 6(1) (1995)
- 안종택, "분단국 통일과 형법적 과거청산정책의 법리에 관한 연구 : 남북한 형법 통합에 대비한 통일독일 모델의 비교법정책적 고찰", 석사, 형사법, pp.2004
- 오경식, "통일대비 형사사법시스템에 대한 연구", 동아법학, (56), pp.155~190 (2012), 법학연구소
- 윤수정, "통일이후 북한체제하에서 내려진 형사판결의 효력에 대한 고찰", 통일과 법률, (17) (2014), 법무부
- 북한형사재판제도 연구 : 특징과 실태, "이규창", 통일연구원, ~ (2011)
- 북한 형사법의 변천과 남북형사법 통합의 과제, "이백규", 북한법연구회, ~ (2013)
- 이장희, "한반도 평화통일 로드맵의 법정책적 과제", 제59회 안암법학회 추계학술발표회 (2014)
- 남북한 사법운용 및 범죄처리에 관한 비교연구, "이종건", 형사정책연구원, ~ (1993)
- 정광진, "북한형법의 특징에 관한 연구 : 구조적 특징에 대한연구", 박사, 형사법, pp.2010
- 개성공업지구법의 문제점과 한국의 고려사항, "제성호", 법무부, ~ (2003)
- 최기식, "독일 통일 사례에 비추어 본 통일한국의 법적 과제", 제59회 안암법학회 2014년 추계학술발표회 (2014)
- 북한이탈주민의 법의식 사례연구, "최봉대", 경남대학교 극동문제연구소, ~ (2011)
- 최종고, "사회주의법 일반 이론에서 본 북한법사상", 북한법률행정논총, 9 (1992), 고려대학교 법학연구소
- 최호진, "독일통일과정에 나타난 형사법적 문제", 통일과 법률 (2010)
- 하태훈, "21세기 한국 형사법과제와 전망 – 정보사회, 위험사회, 통일한국의 형법의 과제와 임무 -", 안암법학, (13) (2001)
- 한명섭, "남북합의서의 법적 성격과 법제화 방안", 통일과 법률 (2011)
- "경향신문, 1997, 9. 29.자 보도", ~ (1997)
- "문화일보, 2014. 12. 9.자 보도", ~ (2014)
- "중앙일보, 1997. 9. 5.자 보도", ~ (1997)
- "월스트리트 저널, 2014. 10. 22.자 보도", ~ (2014)
