본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Endogenous Timing with a Socially Responsible Firm

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경제학

초록

This study considers a duopoly model in which a socially responsible (SR) firm competes with a private firm by incorporating environmental externality and clean technology. We analyze the endogenous market structure where both firms strategically, sequentially, or simultaneously decide quantities, which also affect abatement activities. We reveal that depending on the relative concerns on environment and consumer surplus, the SR firm can be less or more aggressive in production and abatement, and it may earn high profits. Thus, not only the significance of externality but also the instrumental conflict of social concerns are crucial factors in determining the equilibrium of endogenous timing game. Finally, we indicate that unless the concern for externality is high, the simultaneous and sequential move game with SR firm leadership are socially desirable.

Abstract

This study considers a duopoly model in which a socially responsible (SR) firm competes with a private firm by incorporating environmental externality and clean technology. We analyze the endogenous market structure where both firms strategically, sequentially, or simultaneously decide quantities, which also affect abatement activities. We reveal that depending on the relative concerns on environment and consumer surplus, the SR firm can be less or more aggressive in production and abatement, and it may earn high profits. Thus, not only the significance of externality but also the instrumental conflict of social concerns are crucial factors in determining the equilibrium of endogenous timing game. Finally, we indicate that unless the concern for externality is high, the simultaneous and sequential move game with SR firm leadership are socially desirable.

참고문헌 (65)

  1. Amir, R, "Endogenous Timing in Two-Player Games: A Counterexample", Games and Economic Behavior, 9(2), pp.234~237 (1995)
  2. Amir, R, "Endogenous Timing in a Mixed Duopoly", International Journal of Game Theory, 43(3), pp.629~658 (2014)
  3. Baik, K. H, "Strategic Behavior in Contests : Comment", American Economic Review, 82(1), pp.359~362 (1992)
  4. Besley, T, "Profit with Purpose? A Theory of Social Enterprise", American Economic Journal : Economic Policy, 9(3), pp.19~58 (2017)
  5. Brand, B, "A Note on ’Corporate Social Responsibility and Marketing Channel Coordination", Research in Economics, 67(4), pp.324~327 (2013)
  6. Brand, B, "Social Responsibility in a Bilateral Monopoly", Journal of Economics, 115(3), pp.275~289 (2015)
  7. Carvalho, D, "A Cognitive Hierarchy Model of Behavior in the Action Commitment Game", International Journal of Game Theory, 43(3), pp.551~577 (2014)
  8. Chang, Y. M, "Corporate Social Responsibility and International Competition: A Welfare Analysis", Review of International Economics, 22(3), pp.625~638 (2014)
  9. Chiou, J. R, "Environmental Research Joint Ventures under Emission Taxes", Environmental and Resource Economics, 20(2), pp.129~146 (2001)
  10. Chirco, A, "Quantity Competition, Endogenous Motives and Behavioral Heterogeneity", Theory and Decision, 74(1), pp.55~74 (2013)
  11. 조수미, "Subsidization Policy on the Social Enterprise for the Underprivileged", The Korean Economic Review, 33(1), pp.153~178 (2017), 한국경제학회[DOI]
  12. Crifo, P, "The Economics of Corporate Social Responsibility : A Firm-Level Perspective Survey", Journal of Economic Surveys, 29(1), pp.112~130 (2015)
  13. van Damme, E, "Endogenous price leadership", Games and Economic Behavior, 47(2), pp.404~420 (2004)
  14. van Damme, E, "Endogenous Stackelberg Leadership", Games and Economic Behavior, 28(1), pp.105~129 (1999)
  15. Din, H. -R, "Combining the Endogenous Choice of Timing and Competition Version in a Mixed Duopoly", Journal of Economics, 118(2), pp.141~166 (2016)
  16. Ellingsen, T, "On Flexibility in Oligopoly", Economics Letters, 48(1), pp.83~89 (1995)
  17. Fonseca, M. A, "Endogenous Timing in Duopoly : Experimental Evidence", International Journal of Game Theory, 34(3), pp.443~456 (2006)
  18. Ghosh, A, "Reversal of Bertrand-Cournot Rankings in the Presence of Welfare Concerns", Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 170(3), pp.496~519 (2014)
  19. Goering, G. E, "Corporate Social Responsibility and Marketing Channel Coordination", Research in Economics, 66(2), pp.142~148 (2012)
  20. Goering, G. E, "The Profit-Maximizing Case for Corporate Social Responsibility in a Bilateral Monopoly", Managerial and Decision Economics, 35(7), pp.493~499 (2014)
  21. Hamilton, J. H, ""Endogenous Timing in Duopoly Games : Stackelberg or Cournot Equilibria", "Games and Economic Behavior, 2(1), pp.29~46 (1990)
  22. Haraguchi, J, "Cournot-Bertrand Comparison in a Mixed Oligopoly", Journal of Economics, 117(2), pp.117~136 (2016)
  23. Hirose, K, "Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility: A Note on the First-Mover Advantage under Price Competition", Economics Bulletin, 37(1), pp.214~221 (2017)
  24. Hoffmann, M, "Endogenous Timing in General Rent-Seeking and Conflict Models", Games and Economic Behavior, 75(1), pp.168~184 (2012)
  25. Huck, S, "Spatial Voting with Endogenous Timing", Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 162(4), pp.557~570 (2006)
  26. Jinji, N, "Is Corporate Environmentalism Good for Domestic Welfare", Review of International Economics, 5, pp.901~911 (2013)
  27. Katz, R. A, "The Role of Social Enterprise", Vermont Law Review, 35(1), pp.59~103 (2010)
  28. 김승렬, "Eco-Technology Licensing under Emission Tax: Royalty vs. Fixed-Fee", The Korean Economic Review, 30(2), pp.273~300 (2014), 한국경제학회
  29. Kim, S. -L, "The Licensing of Eco-Technology under Emission Taxation : Fixed Fee vs. Auction", International Review of Economics and Finance, 45, pp.343~357 (2016)
  30. Kim, S. -L, "Eco-Technology Licensing by a Foreign Innovator and Privatization Policy in a Polluting Mixed Duopoly", Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting and Economics, 25(3-4), pp.433~448 (2018)
  31. Kitzmueller, M, "Economic Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility", Journal of Economic Literature, 50(1), pp.51~84 (2012)
  32. Kopel, M, "Price and Quantity Contracts in a Mixed Duopoly with a Socially Concerned Firm", Managerial and Decision Economics, 36(8), pp.559~566 (2015)
  33. Kopel, M, "Socially Responsible Firms and Endogenous Choice of Strategic Incentives", Economic Modelling, 29(3), pp.982~989 (2012)
  34. International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2015, "KPMG", ~ (2015)
  35. Lambertini, L, "Incentives, Performance and Desirability of Socially Responsible Firms in a Cournot Oligopoly", Economic Modelling, 50, pp.40~48 (2015)
  36. 이상호, "Environmental Regulations on Vertical Oligopolies with Eco-Industry", The Korean Economic Review, 27(2), pp.311~327 (2011), 한국경제학회
  37. Lee, S. H, "Eco-Firms and the Sequential Adoption of Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility in the Managerial Delegation", B. E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, 19(1), pp.1~19 (2019)
  38. Lee, S.-H, "Endogenous Timing in Private and Mixed Duopolies with Emission Taxes", Journal of Economics, 124(2), pp.175~201 (2018)
  39. Liu, C. -C, "Strategic Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility in a Differentiated Duopoly Market", Economics Letters, 129(4), pp.108~111 (2015)
  40. Lyon, T. P, "Corporate Environmentalism and Public Policy" (2004), Cambridge University Press
  41. Mailath, G. J, "Endogenous Sequencing of Firm Decisions", Journal of Economic Theory, 59(1), pp.169~182 (1993)
  42. Martin, R. L, "Social Entrepreneurship: The Case for Definition", Stanford Social Innovation Review, 5(2), pp.29~39 (2007)
  43. Matsumura, T, "Quantity-Setting Oligopoly with Endogenous Sequencing", International Journal of Industrial Organization, 17(2), pp.289~296 (1999)
  44. Matsumura, T, "Payoff Dominance and Risk Dominance in the Observable Delay Game: A Note", Journal of Economics, 97(3), pp.265~272 (2009)
  45. Matsumura, T, "Competition and Privatization Policies Revisited: the Payoff Interdependence Approach", Journal of Economics, 116(2), pp.137~150 (2015)
  46. Matsumura, T, "Corporate Social Responsibility or Payoff Asymmetry? A Study of an Endogenous Timing Game", Southern Economic Journal, 81(2), pp.457~473 (2014)
  47. Matsumura, T, "Endogenous Timing in Mixed Duopolies With Externality", Australian Economic Papers, 56(4), pp.304~327 (2017)
  48. Naya, J. M, "Endogenous Timing in a Mixed Duopoly Model", Journal of Economics, 116(2), pp.165~174 (2015)
  49. Normann, H. -T, "Endogenous Timing with Incomplete Information and with Observable Delay", Games and Economic Behavior, 39(2), pp.282~291 (2002)
  50. Nosenzo, D, "Endogenous Move Structure and Voluntary Provision of Public Goods : Theory and Experiment", Journal of Public Economic Theory, 13(5), pp.721~754 (2011)
  51. Osborne, M. J, "Candidate Positioning and Entry in a Political Competition", Games and Economic Behavior, 5(1), pp.133~151 (1993)
  52. Pal, D, "Endogenous Timing in a Mixed Oligopoly", Economics Letters, 61(2), pp.181~185 (1998)
  53. Pal, R, "Mixed Duopoly and Environment", Journal of Public Economic Theory, 16(1), pp.96~118 (2014)
  54. Pal, R, "Pollution Tax, Partial Privatization and Environment", Resource and Energy Economics, 40, pp.19~35 (2015)
  55. PricewaterhouseCoopers, "CSR Trends", ~ (2010)
  56. Robson, A. J, "Duopoly with Endogenous Strategic Timing : Stackelberg Regained", International Economic Review, 31(2), pp.263~274 (1990)
  57. Santos-Pinto, L, "Making Sense of the Experimental Evidence on Endogenous Timing in Duopoly Markets", Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 68(3-4), pp.657~666 (2008)
  58. Schelling, T. C, "The strategy of conflict" (1960), Harvard University Press
  59. Schreck, P, "Reviewing the Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: New Evidence and Analysis", Journal of Business Ethics, 103(2), pp.167~188 (2011)
  60. Tsai, T. S, "“Can Privatization be a Catalyst for Environmental R&D and Result in a Cleaner Environment?", Resource and Energy Economics, 43(Supplement C), pp.1~13 (2016)
  61. Ulph, A, "Climate Change - Environmental and Technology Policies in a Sstrategic Context", Environmental and Resource Economics, 37(1), pp.159~180 (2007)
  62. Wang, L. F. S, "Environmental Taxes in a Differentiated Mixed Duopoly", Economic Systems, 33(4), pp.389~396 (2009)
  63. Xu, L, "Emission Tax and Optimal Privatization in Cournot- Bertrand Comparison", Economic Modelling, 55, pp.73~82 (2016)
  64. Xu, L, "Strategic Privatization with Tariffs and Environmental Taxes in an International Mixed Duopoly", Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 56(1), pp.135~154 (2015)
  65. Xu, L, "Environmental Policies with Excess Burden of Taxation in Free-Entry Mixed Markets", International Review of Economics and Finance, 58, pp.1~13 (2018)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)