포스트모던 과학교육의 정당화 : Lyotard를 중심으로
The Justification of Postmodern For Science Education : Focused Lyotard
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Abstract
The Justification of Postmodern For Science Education-Focused Lyotard- Chung, Seok-Hwan The purpose of this thesis is to examine The Postmodern theory of Science Education and its meanings in education. Specifically, This thesis focuses on The construct of the theory of Postmodernism and its implications in Science education. Conclusions are as follows. In the field of Modern Science education the induction of training and technology according with the system's performance becomes more valuable. But the ascendancy of performative underestimates a person's freedom and value, independent of system. Postmodern Philosophy criticizes every metanarratives, like system theory operating under this performative principle in that it entails a kind of terror to make the incommensurable commensurable. To fight successfully against the terror of metanarratives, Postmodern theory of Science Education introduces a form of legitimation grounded on paralogy. Paralogy is a sphere that philosopher embodies the logic of dissent, not one that expert pursues consensus. we can find a case to apply the sublime as aim of postmodern education to individual subject in science education. The science theory, according to Lyotard, accepts the relativity of space-time and is open to possibility of changes. This happens when we apply the difference principle to the science. If we are to enforce the critical mind to come over the traditional paradigm, we should consider that the knowledge of science has the characteristic of error, reform, and not-lasting. The purpose of science education is to support scientific attitude, critical thinking, and the habit of construction through the active learning. In other words, it encourages new moves and possibilities of other purposes within one system. Also, not excluding other voices, it accepts the possibility of various utterances and strengthens patience to tolerate difference.
참고문헌 (24)
- "Rorty의 신실용주의적 지식론과 그 교육적 의의" (2001)
- "포퍼와 현대의 과학철학" (1992)
- "전통과 혁명", 7 (2004), 한국과학철학회
- "Lyotard의 포스트모던 지식론과 그 교육적 의의", 33 (2002)
- "쉽게 풀어 쓴 교육철학 및 교육사" (2007), 서울: 동문사
- "지식의 구성적 관점과 학교교육", 18 (2000), 한국교육철학회
- "비절대적 지식관과 지식교육의 문제", 31 (2007), 한국교육철학회
- "공약불가능성 논제의 방법론적 도전" (1996), 한국철학회
- "과학적 합리성에 대한 재고", 22 (2005), 서울대학교 철학사상 연구소
- "규범적 자연주의와 도구적 합리성", 9(2) (2006), 한국과학철학회
- "인식론의 역사" (1991)
- "The Structure Of Scientific Revolutions Univ of Chicago Press" (1970)
- "A Report on the Knowledge trans by Geoffrey Bennington and Brian Massumi University of Minnesota press" (1984)
- "A Report on Knowledge" (1985), Manchester University
- "Univ of Minnesota Press" (1993)
- "The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge" (1996), Manchester: Manchester University Press
- "Martin`s포스트모던 과학교육의 정당화 -Lyotard를 중심으로-" (1981)
- "Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge", (rmal science and its dangers) (1970), CambridgeUniversity Press
- "Consequences of Pragmatism", The HarverstPress
- "The teaching of Science as Enquiry" (1962), Harvard University Press
- "Kuhn and Schwab on Science Texts and the Goals ofScience Education" (1978)
- "The Hidden Agenda of Modernity University of Chicago Press" (1990)
- "Education in Western Culture" (1965), Inc
- "trans by Denis Paul & Anscombe" (1969)
