'실천적 지식'의 두 가지 유형에 관한 고찰: '테크네'와 '프로네시스'를 중심으로
An anlysis on two kinds of “Practical knowledge”: “techne” and “phronesis”
1
조회
0
다운로드
31
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to clarify the ambiguity inherent in the concept of the "practical knowledge". The concept of "competence"which is the recent representative of the practical knowledge, has an ambiguity. It is considered as an job-specific competence as well as a more universal capacity containing intellectual and social meaning regarding one's job. In order to get rid of this ambiguity, this study investigates on the Aristotelian concepts of practical knowledge, that is,"techne" and "phronesis". Techne is a skill or competence for "making a product", while phronesis is a practical knowledge for "doing well"as a citizen in a polis. According to the "parallel model", since techne and phronesis is applied in the separate domain, there is no possibility of interaction or fusion between two kinds of knowledge. On the other hand, the "fusion model", focusing on the "dependency" of techne, and trying to overcome it, makes it important the acqusition of phronesis. According to "fusion model", phronesis is acquired by learning knowledge regarding "the good of community". The learning process of phronesis is exemplied by the "Socratic method". Refecting on the particularities of life in the light of the universals of "the good of community", the Socratic method leads us to acquire the competence of phronesis. The dependency of techne is overcome by learning phronesis, since it permits us apply any techne properly. The "fusion model" is the alternative of the "parallel model" in teaching practical knowledge.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to clarify the ambiguity inherent in the concept of the "practical knowledge". The concept of "competence"which is the recent representative of the practical knowledge, has an ambiguity. It is considered as an job-specific competence as well as a more universal capacity containing intellectual and social meaning regarding one's job. In order to get rid of this ambiguity, this study investigates on the Aristotelian concepts of practical knowledge, that is,"techne" and "phronesis". Techne is a skill or competence for "making a product", while phronesis is a practical knowledge for "doing well"as a citizen in a polis. According to the "parallel model", since techne and phronesis is applied in the separate domain, there is no possibility of interaction or fusion between two kinds of knowledge. On the other hand, the "fusion model", focusing on the "dependency" of techne, and trying to overcome it, makes it important the acqusition of phronesis. According to "fusion model", phronesis is acquired by learning knowledge regarding "the good of community". The learning process of phronesis is exemplied by the "Socratic method". Refecting on the particularities of life in the light of the universals of "the good of community", the Socratic method leads us to acquire the competence of phronesis. The dependency of techne is overcome by learning phronesis, since it permits us apply any techne properly. The "fusion model" is the alternative of the "parallel model" in teaching practical knowledge.
참고문헌 (11)
- 소경희, "역량기반 교육의 교육과정사적 기반 및 자유교육적 성격 탐색", 교육과정연구, 27(1), pp.1~20 (2009), 한국교육과정학회
- 오헌석, "역량중심 인적자원개발의 비판과 쟁점 분석", 경영교육연구, (47), pp.191~214 (2007), 한국경영교육학회
- 홍은숙, "교육의 개념" (2007), 교육과학사
- Aristotle, "Nicomachean Ethics" (1985), Hackett Publishing Company
- Aristotle, "The Works of Aristotle : Ⅰ" (1990), University of Chicago
- Aristotle, "Ethica Nicomachea, recognovit brevique adnotatione critica instruxit" (2006), Clarendon Press
- Aristotle, "Aristotelis Politica" (2009), 숲
- Dunne, J., "Back to the Rough Ground: 'Phronesis' and 'Techne', In Modern Philosophy and in Aristotle" (1993), University of Notre Dame press
- Plato, "Collected Dialogues vol. 1" (1961), Princeton University Press
- Ryle, G, "Dialectic in Academy, In New Essays on Plato and Aristotle" (1965), RKP
- Zeller, E., "Outlines of the History of Greek Philosophy" (1980), Dover Publications, Inc
