『노자』에서 스승의 모습 탐색 : 「聖人」개념을 중심으로
A Study about Susung(스승) from 『Lao -Tzu(老子)』
2
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is look into ‘Susung(Korean’s traditional teacher)’ from 『Lao -Tzu(老子)』, also known as 『Tao Te Ching(道德經)』. The Su-Sung’s three characters are in the 『Lao -Tzu(老子)』. First, he is one who knows a positive knowledge in the Tao- Te Ching, and how to stop the behavior or thought. He, in pure and true form, meets with students, so that students can get inspiration themselves. Second, he is one who goes back to the brightness. He deeply knows about the 'being' rather than understanding the harmony of the universe and insight of the life as an 'object'. He reminds students to look inside themselves well. Third, he may look ordinary, but inside he is extraordinary. Because of his ordinary appearance students will not give up. But he leads the students into an extraordinary state. We, ourselves, must ruminate on these three characteristics. Only then can we assume them.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is look into ‘Susung(Korean’s traditional teacher)’ from 『Lao -Tzu(老子)』, also known as 『Tao Te Ching(道德經)』. The Su-Sung’s three characters are in the 『Lao -Tzu(老子)』. First, he is one who knows a positive knowledge in the Tao- Te Ching, and how to stop the behavior or thought. He, in pure and true form, meets with students, so that students can get inspiration themselves. Second, he is one who goes back to the brightness. He deeply knows about the 'being' rather than understanding the harmony of the universe and insight of the life as an 'object'. He reminds students to look inside themselves well. Third, he may look ordinary, but inside he is extraordinary. Because of his ordinary appearance students will not give up. But he leads the students into an extraordinary state. We, ourselves, must ruminate on these three characteristics. Only then can we assume them.
참고문헌 (35)
- "노자", ~
- "논어", ~
- "맹자", ~
- "사기", ~
- "설문해자", ~
- "월인석보", ~
- "이아", ~
- "조선왕조실록", ~
- "훈몽자회", ~
- 강선보, "마르틴 부버 『만남』의 교육철학" (2003), 원미사
- 김만겸, "임희일의 노자 풀이" (2014), 소강
- 김민재, "『도덕경』의 ‘명(明)’ 개념이 지니는 세계시민교육적 의의", 윤리철학교육, 15, pp.161~180 (2011)
- 김시천, "율곡 이이는 왜 ‘노자’를 주석했을까?,", 신동아 2011년 8월호, ~ (2011)
- 김시천, "이단에서 전통으로장자, 진유가 된 한 사이비의 역사", 시대와 철학, 16(2), pp.69~119 (2005), 한국철학사상연구회
- 2012, , ~
- 김홍경, "노자" (2007), 들녘
- 남궁달화, "도덕교육사상" (2014), 학지사
- 목영해, "교육의 이해" (2005), 문음사
- 박균섭, "교육사상사강론" (2011), 문음사
- 박균섭, "한훤당 김굉필의 교육사상 재검토", 영남학, (22), pp.141~180 (2012), 영남문화연구원
- 염정삼, "설문해자주-부수자역해" (2007), 서울대학교출판부
- 오태석, "노자 도덕경 기호체계의 상호텍스트성 연구", 중국어문학지, (49), pp.51~96 (2014), 중국어문학회
- 유병래, "도덕경에서의 智의 의미", 道敎學硏究, 17, pp.107~142 (2001)
- 유성애, "노자의 도덕경이 교육자에게 주는 의미", 연세교육연구, 16(1), pp.215~238 (2003)
- 유일, "『도덕경』 '불상현'의 교육적 함의", 석사, 초등교육사상, pp.2011
- 이석명, "노자도덕경하상공장구" (2007), 소명출판
- 이유정, "노자 『도덕경』에 나타난 성인(聖人)의 인격교화론", 인격교육, 6(1), pp.85~110 (2012), 한국인격교육학회[DOI]
- 임수무, "도덕경" (2003), 계명대학교출판부
- 임채우, "왕필의 노자" (1998), 예문서원
- 장상호, "사대스승의 메타교육", 敎育原理硏究, 5(1), pp.49~127 (2000)
- 정재걸, "오래된 미래교육" (2010), 살림터
- 조민환, "『老子』에 나타난 ‘常’字 연구", 哲學, 59(여름), pp.5~24 (1999)
- 조원일, "孔子의 聖人觀 硏究", 동서철학연구, (67), pp.271~288 (2013), 한국동서철학회
- 최진석, "老子義疏" (2007), 소나무
- 황금중, "노자의 교육론과 그 사상사적 의미", 미래교육연구, 18(1), pp.47~70 (2005)