키렌 이건의 상상력 교육에서의 비고츠키 이론에 대한 비판적 성찰
A Critical Reflection on Vygotsky's theory in Kieran Egan's Learning in Depth Program
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study attempts to examine the relationship between Vygotsky’s theory and Kieran Egan’s ‘Learning in Depth’. Egan’s theory of imaginative education is said to be based on Vygotsky’s idea. Thus, by comparing them, we can see their similarities and their differences. Like Vygotsky’s theory of imagination, that of Egan also emphasizes the importance of the experience and of the emotion in the development of the imagination. Also, a close analogy exists between the LiD of Egan and true concept of Vygotsky. However, there are some incompatible aspects between Vygotsky’s theory and that of Egan: with regard to the abstract thinking, while the one considers the abstract thinking impossible in children, the other considers it possible in children; with regard to the language, while the language is understood in the cognitive context by the one, the bodily and emotional elements of the language as well as those of oral language are stressed by the other.
Abstract
This study attempts to examine the relationship between Vygotsky’s theory and Kieran Egan’s ‘Learning in Depth’. Egan’s theory of imaginative education is said to be based on Vygotsky’s idea. Thus, by comparing them, we can see their similarities and their differences. Like Vygotsky’s theory of imagination, that of Egan also emphasizes the importance of the experience and of the emotion in the development of the imagination. Also, a close analogy exists between the LiD of Egan and true concept of Vygotsky. However, there are some incompatible aspects between Vygotsky’s theory and that of Egan: with regard to the abstract thinking, while the one considers the abstract thinking impossible in children, the other considers it possible in children; with regard to the language, while the language is understood in the cognitive context by the one, the bodily and emotional elements of the language as well as those of oral language are stressed by the other.
참고문헌 (17)
- 곽덕주, "상상력과 지식교육: 이건과 비고츠키를 중심으로", 교육철학연구, 38(4), pp.1~31 (2016), 한국교육철학학회[DOI]
- 김회용, "상상력과 교육의 관계 연구", 사고개발, 11(1), pp.87~109 (2015), 대한사고개발학회
- 박찬영, "페다고지를 위하여" (2017), 살림터
- 柴田 義松, "ヴィゴツキー入門" (2006), 寺子屋新書
- 中村和夫, "理論神髄 : 文化-歴史的理論" (2014), 福村出版
- Egan, K., "Imagination in Teaching and Learning: the Middle School Years" (1992), University of Chicago Press
- Egan, K., "The educated mind: how cognitive tools shapes our understanding" (1997), The University of Chicago Press
- Egan, K., "The future of education: reimagining our schools from the ground up" (2008), Yale University Press
- 김회용, "상상력 교육: 미래 학교를 디자인하다" (2014), 학지사
- Egan, K., "깊은 학습" (2014), 학지사
- Ong, W., "구술문화와 문자문화" (1995), 문예출판사
- Vygotsky, L. S., "The Development of Higher sychological Processes" (1978), Harvard University Press
- Vygotsky, L. S, "어린이의 상상과 창조" (2014), 살림터
- Vygotsky, L. S., "생각과 말" (2011), 살림터
- Vygotsky, L. S, "역사와 발달 I. II" (2013), 살림터
- Vygotsky, L. S, "어린이의 상상과 창조" (2014), 살림터
- Vygotsky, L. S, "어린이의상상과 창조" (2014), 살림터