본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

성(性)·리(理)의 세계관과 공부론(工夫論) - 그 정당화 문제를 중심으로 -

The Xing(性) - li(理) Worldview and Neo - Confucian theory of Learning - focusing on the issue of its justification -

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

The neo-Confucian theory of learning is premised upon the xing-li worldview. As such, what the xing-li worldview is, how it is justified, and what influence it actually has on concepts of learning are essential problems in understanding the neo-Confucian theory of learning. This article first describes the meaning of xing and li, and the characteristics of the human condition and cosmology derived thereof. Next, it is argued that 'experience' is the primary mechanism for justifying the xing-li worldview. It is contended that in the Western academic tradition the primary mechanism for justifying truth is linguistic-logical Reason, whereas in neo-Confucianism this role is fulfilled by 'experience,' which is understood to broadly encompass knowledge and conduct, emotion, intellect, and spirituality. Additionally, the existence of sages as exemplars of the paramount of experience also functions as a basis for justifying the xing-li worldview. This article continues on to discuss how the theory of learning construed in this worldview has satisfied and deviated from the ideal of xing-li throughout the history of its practical application. In the process of discussion, it is also examined how the worldview of xing-li could be understood, supplemented, and critiqued from the point of view of 240 교육철학 제60집both Reason in the Western philosophical tradition and the Daoist perspective of Laozi.

Abstract

The neo-Confucian theory of learning is premised upon the xing-li worldview. As such, what the xing-li worldview is, how it is justified, and what influence it actually has on concepts of learning are essential problems in understanding the neo-Confucian theory of learning. This article first describes the meaning of xing and li, and the characteristics of the human condition and cosmology derived thereof. Next, it is argued that 'experience' is the primary mechanism for justifying the xing-li worldview. It is contended that in the Western academic tradition the primary mechanism for justifying truth is linguistic-logical Reason, whereas in neo-Confucianism this role is fulfilled by 'experience,' which is understood to broadly encompass knowledge and conduct, emotion, intellect, and spirituality. Additionally, the existence of sages as exemplars of the paramount of experience also functions as a basis for justifying the xing-li worldview. This article continues on to discuss how the theory of learning construed in this worldview has satisfied and deviated from the ideal of xing-li throughout the history of its practical application. In the process of discussion, it is also examined how the worldview of xing-li could be understood, supplemented, and critiqued from the point of view of 240 교육철학 제60집both Reason in the Western philosophical tradition and the Daoist perspective of Laozi.

참고문헌 (40)

  1. "論語", ~
  2. "孟子", ~
  3. "大學", ~
  4. "中庸", ~
  5. "四書集註", ~
  6. "小學", ~
  7. "朱子語類", ~
  8. "朱熹集", ~
  9. "大學或問", ~
  10. "聖學十圖", ~
  11. "聖學輯要", ~
  12. "擊蒙要訣", ~
  13. "童蒙先習", ~
  14. "二程集", ~
  15. "老子", ~
  16. 김상섭, "현대인의 교사 루소" (2009), 학지사
  17. 루소(Jean-Jacques Rousseau), "에밀" (2006), 육문사
  18. 마르쿠스 아우렐리우스(Marcus Aurelius), "명상록" (2008), 홍신문화사
  19. 박종천, "예, 3천년 동양을 지배하다" (2011), 글항아리
  20. 2010, , ~
  21. 스피노자(Spinoza), "에티카" (2007), 서광사
  22. 아우구스티누스(Augustine), "고백록" (1990), 대한기독교서회
  23. 아우구스티누스(Augustine), "아우구스티누스 : 후기 저서들" (2011), 두란노아카데미
  24. 에픽테토스(Epictetus), "엥케이리디온" (2003), 까치글방
  25. 연세대학교 교육철학연구회, "위대한 교육사상가들 Ⅰ,Ⅱ" (1998), 교육과학사
  26. 주영흠, "아우구스티누스의 교육사상" (2007), 학지사
  27. 페스탈로찌(Pestalozzi), "숨은이의 저녁노을" (2000), 박영사
  28. 프뢰벨(Friedrich W. A. Frőbel), "인간의 교육" (2005), 양서원
  29. 소크라테스의 변명, "국가", pp.1990, 플라톤(Platon)
  30. 플로티노스(Plotinus), "영혼-정신-하나 : 플로티노스의중심개념" (2008), 나남
  31. 황금중, "주자의 공부론 연구", 박사, 교육학, pp.2000
  32. 황금중, "퇴계의 공부론과 『성학십도』", 한국교육사학, 23(2), pp.321~356 (2001), 한국교육사학회
  33. 황금중, "栗谷의 工夫論과 『聖學輯要』", 한국교육사학, 24(1), pp.303~365 (2002), 한국교육사학회
  34. 황금중, "성리학의 소학·대학 교육과정론: 주자·퇴계·율곡의견해를 중심으로", 한국사상과 문화, 17, pp.353~391 (2002), 한국사상문화학회
  35. 황금중, "남명의 공부론, 어떻게 주자학적인가?", 한국교육사학, 29(2), pp.231~257 (2007), 한국교육사학회
  36. 황금중, "주자학의 공부 원리로서의 ‘위기지학’, ‘하학이상달’, ‘존덕성이도문학’", 한국교육사학, 31(2), pp.181~204 (2009), 한국교육사학회
  37. 황금중, "공(公)과 사(私)에 대한 주희(朱熹)의 인식과 공공성 교육", 교육사상연구, 26(3), pp.229~257 (2012), 한국교육사상연구회
  38. 황금중, "학學이란 무엇인가" (2014), 글항아리
  39. John Dewey, "John Dewey: The Middle Works 1899-1924 Vol. 12" (1920), Southern Illinois University Press
  40. John Dewey, "John Dewey: The Later Works 1925-1953 Vol.13", pp.1~62 (1938), Southern Illinois University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)