본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

주요국에서의 CISG의 적용과 우리의 과제 - 미국·중국·한국을 중심으로 -

A Study on the Application of CISG among the major Trading Countries - With emphasis on US, Chinese and Korean Cases -

서헌제
국제거래법학회 (Korea International Trade Law Association)|2009.07|국제거래법연구 (Korean Forum on International Trade and Business Law)|제18권 제1호|pp. 73-105

0

조회

0

다운로드

24

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

국제매매CISG비엔나협약적용범위joint venture agreement합작계약적용배제판매점계약적용확장주된 영업소직접적용간접적용적용유보중국중재재판소international salesscope of applicationopt outopt inCLOUTdistributorship agreementprincipal place of businessdirect applicationindirect applicationreservation of applicationCIETAC
주제분류법학

초록

Abstract

In this paper, the scope of application of the CISG(The United Nations Convention on Contract for the International Sale of Good) in USA, China, and Korea has been reviewed in the context of comparative law basis. At first, the survey report on the CISG applications based on the questionaire to lawyers, working in the field of the international trade, was introduced. Inspite of the fact that there exist greate academic concerns and expectations toward CISG, broad applications of CISG in practice seems to require more time. Such phenomenon is common in the most major trading countries including US, Germany, China, and Korea. In case of US court decisions on the CISG application, there are numbers of incoherent cases against international trend. It is desirable for the American court which generates great deal of impacts to the world, to consider international court cases and international publications about the CISG for the reference. In China, there is some confusion between domestic law and CISG without proper legitimate considerations. Such conflicts in the application of CISG among the major trading countries will be diminished by the enlargement of CLOUT and the effort of many scholars. As the CISG has been effective from March 1, 2005 in Korea, no court case or arbitral award on the CISG application was officially reported to CLOUT(Case Law on UNCITRAL Texts) until now. But I think the Seoul East District Court Decision(2007.11.16, 2006 GA HAP 6384) may be the first and the only case on the CISG application in Korea, which has been briefly analysed in this paper. In my opinion, the Court should have considered the international cases in the judgment in order to achieve the international uniformity. I also feel sorry that the reason, why the judgment is not registered in CLOUT, is dereliction of our duty as the CISG member. Now, as long as the trading partners of Korean firms located in CISG member countries including China, USA, and even Japan, don’t exclude the applications of the CISG, it will be automatically applied to the most Korean foreign sales. As disputes regarding CISG will be noticeably increased, the encouragement of the interest toward CISG to staffs in charge of international trade will be necessary. That is the reason why academic-industrial cooperative research of CISG has to be carried out. And, the CISG will also be excellent reference data in the process of the civil law amendment in Korea as shown in the case of China and Japan. Therefore, the academic collaboration among the civil law, commercial law, and international trade law regarding these task agendas should be strongly prompt.

참고문헌 (46)

  1. 김인호, "국제물품매매계약에 관한 국제연합협약에 관한 판례의 동향", 국제거래법연구, 14(2), pp.101~126 (2005), 국제거래법학회
  2. 법무부, "국제물품매매계약에 관한 유엔협약사례연구 I", ~ (2004)
  3. 김선국, "국제물품매매계약에 관한 유엔협약과 미국통일상법전 제2편(매매)", 해사법연구, 15(2), pp.207~223 (2003), 한국해사법학회
  4. 김선국, "국제물품매매협약에 관한 미국판례의 동향", 상사법연구, 21(2), pp.1~39 (2002), 한국상사법학회
  5. 손태우, "국제물품매매계약에 관한 유엔협약(CISG)의 적용상의 통일성에 관한 최근 미국판례의 태도와 그 개선책에 관한 고찰", 법학연구, 47(1) (2006)
  6. "Case Law on UNCITRAL Texts(CLOUT)"[URL]
  7. "UNCITRAL Digest of Case Law on CISG"[URL]
  8. Martin F. Koehler, "THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE UNIFIED SALES LAW (CISG) IN DIFFERENT LEGAL SYSTEMS-An International Comparison of Three Surveys on the Exclusion of the CISG’s Application Conducted in the United States, Germany and China", Pace Int’l L. Rev., 20, pp.45~
  9. "2003", ~
  10. "2004", ~
  11. "XU Junke,The CISG in Chinese Legal Practice"[URL]
  12. Ulrich Magnus, "Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch mit Einführungsgesetzen und Nebengesetzen Buch 2: Recht Der Schuldverhdltnisse", F.R.G., ~ (2005)
  13. M.J. Bonnell, "Commentary on the International Sales Law: The 1980 Vienna Sales Convention 3", ~ (1987)
  14. Peter Shlechtriem, "in Kommentar zum Einheitlichen UN-Kaufrecht", ~ (2004)
  15. Joanne M. Darkey, "A U.S. Court’s Interpretation of Damage Provisions Under the U.N. Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods: A Preliminary Step Towards an International Jurisprudence of CISG or a Missed Opportunity?", J.L. & Com., 15, pp.139~ (1995)
  16. Richard Speidel, "The Revision of UCC Article 2, Sales in Light of the United Nation Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods", Nw. J. Int’l L. & Bus., 16, pp.165~ (1995)
  17. Caroline Delisle Klepper, "The Convention for the International Sale of Goods: A Practical Guide for the State of Maryland and its Trade Community", Md. J. Int’l L. & Trade, 15, pp.235~ (1991)
  18. Alison E. Butler, "Interpretation of ‘Place of Business’: Comparison Between Provisions of the CISG (Article 10) and the Counterpart Provisions of the PECL", Vindobona J. Int’l Com. L. & Arb., 6, pp.275~ (2002)
  19. Larry A. DiMatteo, "The CISG and the Presumption of Enforceability: Unintended Contractual Liability in International Business Dealings", Yale J. Int’l L., 22, pp.111~ (1997)
  20. Martin Karollus, "Judicial Interpretation and Application of the CISG in Germany 1988-1994, in Review of the Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods", Cornell Int’l Law Journal (1995)
  21. "The Passing of Risk: A Comparison Between the Passing of Risk Under the CISG and German Law"[URL]
  22. Ralph H. Folsom, "Spanogle, Jr., International Business Transactions(2d ed.)", ~ (2001)
  23. Louis F. Del Duca, "Selected Topics Under the Convention on International Sale of Goods (CISG)", Dick. L. Rev., 106, pp.205~ (2001)
  24. Xiao Yongping, "SELECTED TOPICS ON THE APPLICATION OF THE GISG IN CHINA", Pace Int’l L. Rev., 20 (2008)
  25. Ding Ding, "China and GISG, in CISG and China: Theory and Practice 25", ~ (1999)
  26. Xiaolin Wang, "The Chinese Declaration Against Oral Contracts Under the CISG", Vindobona J. Int’l com. L. & Arb., 8, pp.145~ (2004)
  27. Bruno Zeller, "CISG and china, in CISG and china: Dialog Deutschland-Schweiz VII 7", ~ (1999)
  28. Wang Chengbin, "A Comparison Between the CISG and the FECL (Part I)", Chinese Legal Science, (3) (1989)
  29. Wang Chengbin, "A Comparison Between the CISG and the FECL (Part II)", Chinese Legal Science, (4) (1989)
  30. Wang Chengbin, "A Comparison Between the CISG and the FECL (Part III)", Chinese Legal Science, (5) (1989)
  31. Jianming Shen, "Declaring the Contract Avoided: The U.N. Sales Convention in the Chinese Context", N.Y. Int’l L. Rev., 10, pp.7~ (1997)
  32. Yinghao Yang, "Suspension Rules under Chinese Contract Law, the UCC, and the CISG: Some Comparative Perspectives", China Law & Practice(Sept.), ~ (2008)
  33. Adam M. Giuliano, "Nonconformity in the Sale of Goods Between the United States and China: the New Chinese Contract Law, the Uniform Commercial Code, and the Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods", Fla. J. Int’l L., 18, pp.331~ (2006)
  34. Marcus S. Jacobs, "An Arbitrator’s Power and Duties Under Art. 114 of Chinese Contract Law in Awarding Damages in China in Respect of a Dispute under a Contract Governed by CISG", Mealey’s Int’l Arb. Rep., 20, pp.39~ (2005)
  35. Dong Wu, "CIETAc’s Practice on the CISG", Nordic J. Com. L., (2) (2005)
  36. Florian Mohs, "Penalty and Liquidated Damages Clauses in CISG Contracts Revisited", Mealey’s Int’l Arb. Rep., 21, pp.1~ (2006)
  37. Allison E. Butler, "Contracts for the International Sale of Goods in China", Int’l Litig. Q., 21(3), pp.3~ (2006)
  38. Chen Zhidong, "On the Application of the CISG in China: With Comment on Article 142 of the GPCL", Legal Science, (10) (2004)
  39. Michael G. Bridge, "The Bifocal World of International Sales: Vienna and Non-Vienna, in Making Commercial Law: Essay in Honour of Roy Goode 277", ~ (1997)
  40. Alastair Mullis, "Twenty-Five Years On-The United Kingdom, Damages and the Vienna Sales Convention, in 71 Rabels Zeitzchrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht", Rab. Zeit. aus. int’l Priv., pp.35~
  41. P.S. Atiyah, "Summers, Form and Substance in Anglo-American Law: A Comparative Study in Legal Reasoning, Legal Theory, and Legal Institutions", ~ (1987)
  42. Hiroo Sono, "JAPAN’S ACCESSION TO THE CISG: THE ASIA FACTOR", Pace Int’l L. Rev., 20, pp.105~ (2008)
  43. Luke Nottage, "Who’s Afraid of the Vienna Sales Convention (CISG)? A New Zealander’s View from Australia and Japan", Victoria Wellington L. Rev., 36, pp.815~ (2005)
  44. Hiroo Sono, (2005), Nipponhyoronsha
  45. Peter Winship, "The Scope of the Vienna Convention on International Sales Contracts, in International sales: The United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods 1-1", 49~ (1984)
  46. John o. Honnold, "Uniform Law for International Sales Under the 1980 United Nations convention 40 (3d ed.)", ~ (1999)

관련 논문AI추천

“CISG”에 내재하고 있는 미국법적 요소 분석 - 미국 “UCC”를 중심으로 -가정준국제거래법학회 · 국제거래법연구2009 · 제18권 제1호국제물품매매협약에 관한 미국판례의 동향김선국한국상사법학회 · 상사법연구2002 · 제21권 제2호국제물품매매계약에 관한 국제연합협약에 관한 판례의 동향김인호국제거래법학회 · 국제거래법연구2005 · 제14권 제2호국제물품매매계약에 관한 UN협약과 우리나라 상법의 비교신창섭국제거래법학회 · 국제거래법연구2005 · 제14권 제2호CISG를 적용한 최근 미국 판례에 관한 연구김용의국제거래법학회 · 국제거래법연구2011 · 제20권 제1호국제물품매매계약에 관한 유엔협약과 우리법의 비교적 검토최흥섭한국사법학회 · 비교사법2004 · 제11권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)

“CISG”에 내재하고 있는 미국법적 요소 분석 - 미국 “UCC”를 중심으로 -가정준pp. 9-27비교 계약법적 관점에서 본 CISG: 앞으로의 과제 -Battle of Forms와 몇 가지 점을 중심으로-김선국pp. 29-47국제물품거래에서의 매수인의 대금감액권 －「국제물품매매계약에 관한 UN협약」 제50조를 중심으로－김진우pp. 49-72국제전자상거래상 소비자계약분쟁의 국제재판관할권에 관한 연구 -미국의 타깃팅 재판관할권이론을 중심으로-김성진pp. 107-130국제적 상계에 대한 준거법이헌묵pp. 131-161
원문 보기