본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

부실기재선하증권을 발행한 해상운송인의 포장당 책임제한조항 적용가능성에 대한 연구-미국 Berisford Metals Corp. v. S/S Salvador, and A/S Ivarans Rederi(1985) 판례를 중심으로-

A study on a misrepresented B/L and Package Limitation to a Carrier’s Liability

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

It has been widely acknowledged that a carrier’s liability shall be limited to certain amount per package or per an accident. In this respect, the Hague Rules,which was adopted in 1924, limits a carrier’s liability to 100 pounds per package. Numerous countries including U.S.A, Korea, accepted the Hague Rules. Nevertheless, it has been criticized that a carrier’s liability is limited even though the damage is caused by its willful or gross negligent conduct. The Hague-Visby Rules, which is an amendment to the Hague Rules, provides some an exception to the package limitation of a carrier’s liability. Korea accepted the Hague-Visby Rules, but U.S.A. didn’t. However, U.S. federal courts recognized some exceptions in case of vacant B/L, or misrepresented B/L. In Berisford case regarding misrepresented B/L, the federal court concluded that carrier must held responsible for full value of the lost cargo and cannot invoke the $500 package limitation of liability provision of COGSA. The court applied a higher standard in the event that a carrier makes a representation in a B/L with respect to its own conduct since it is reasonably expected to be aware of its own actions, including whether or not it has loaded cargo. Furthemore, the court held that the carrier’s misrepresentation amounted to a fundamental breach going to the very essence of its contract and precluding it from invoking those package limitation of liability provision.

Abstract

It has been widely acknowledged that a carrier’s liability shall be limited to certain amount per package or per an accident. In this respect, the Hague Rules,which was adopted in 1924, limits a carrier’s liability to 100 pounds per package. Numerous countries including U.S.A, Korea, accepted the Hague Rules. Nevertheless, it has been criticized that a carrier’s liability is limited even though the damage is caused by its willful or gross negligent conduct. The Hague-Visby Rules, which is an amendment to the Hague Rules, provides some an exception to the package limitation of a carrier’s liability. Korea accepted the Hague-Visby Rules, but U.S.A. didn’t. However, U.S. federal courts recognized some exceptions in case of vacant B/L, or misrepresented B/L. In Berisford case regarding misrepresented B/L, the federal court concluded that carrier must held responsible for full value of the lost cargo and cannot invoke the $500 package limitation of liability provision of COGSA. The court applied a higher standard in the event that a carrier makes a representation in a B/L with respect to its own conduct since it is reasonably expected to be aware of its own actions, including whether or not it has loaded cargo. Furthemore, the court held that the carrier’s misrepresentation amounted to a fundamental breach going to the very essence of its contract and precluding it from invoking those package limitation of liability provision.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. 김인현, "2007년 改正 商法 海商篇의 개정 내용과 의의", 한국해법학회지, 31(1), pp.99~156 (2009), 한국해법학회
  2. 김창준, "운송인의 책임제한 배제사유", 한국해법학회지, 29(2), pp.7~35 (2007), 한국해법학회
  3. 서헌제, "국제거래법" (2006), 법문사
  4. 심재두, "해상운송법" (1997), 길안사
  5. 이기수, "해상물품운송-영국법을 중심으로", 한국해법학회지, 11(1) (1990), 한국해법학회
  6. 이기수, "보험⋅해상법" (2008), 박영사
  7. 이기수, "국제거래법" (2005), 세창출판사
  8. 정동윤, "상법(하)" (2008), 법문사
  9. 정찬형, "상법(하)" (2008), 박영사
  10. 최종현, "空선하증권의 효력", 한국해법학회지, 29(1), pp.127~164 (2007), 한국해법학회
  11. 최종현, "개정 해상법 하에서의 해상운송인의 지위 - 해상운송인의 손해배상책임제도를 중심으로 -", 한국해법학회지, 30(1), pp.49~83 (2008), 한국해법학회
  12. 최종현, "한국 해상법의 발전 방향", 한국해법학회지, 31(1), pp.7~56 (2009), 한국해법학회
  13. 최준선, "국제거래법" (2008), 삼영사
  14. 한광희, "해상운송인의 책임확대에 관한 연구(해상보험의 담보범위 및 복합운송인의 책임과 관련하여)", 박사, pp.2002
  15. Clive M. Schmitthoff, "Export Trade : The Law And Practice Of International Trade, 9th ed" (1990), London Steven & Sons
  16. Ralph H. Folsom, "International Business Transactions, 8th Ed" (2009), West Group
  17. Sweeney, "Prism of COGSA", Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce, 4 (1999)
  18. Thomas Edward Scrutton, "Charterparties and Bills of Lading, 16th ed" (1955), Sweet & Maxwell
  19. "Oliver Straw Goods Corporation v. Osaka Shosen Kaisha", ~ (1928)
  20. "Berisford Metals Corp. v. S", S Salvador, and A, pp.1985, ~
  21. "대법원 1980.11.11 자 선고, 80 다 1812", ~ (1980)
  22. "대법원 1983.3.22 선고, 82 다카 1533", ~ (1983)
  23. "대법원 1988.9.27 선고, 86 다카 2377", ~ (1988)
  24. "대법원 1982.9.14. 선고 80다1325)", ~ (1982)
  25. "대법원 2001.2. 9. 선고 98다49074", ~ (2001)
  26. "대법원 2002.5.28. 선고 2001다12621", ~ (2002)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)