항공기 운항자의 지상 제3자에 대한 무과실 책임에 관한 소고
Liability for third party damage caused by aircraft
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Ministry of Justice has completed draft of Part Ⅵ of the Korean Commercial Code, “Carriage by Air”. The international convention on air carriage such as the Montreal Convention 1999 and the Rome Convention 1952 and 1978 have affected seriously on the bill. This article discusses especially the liability for third party damages caused by aircraft. Some commentators criticise the draft because it has followed the principle [doctrine] of strict [absolute, no-fault] liability of the Rome convention. This writer has answered back in pointing that two treaties, which recently had been established by ICAO, one on the compensation for general risk damage caused by aircraft, the other one on compensation for damage from acts of unlawful interference involving aircraft, could not successfully in effect in the short future, although Both Conventions improved the old Convention/Protocol in many aspects. In the meantime, the Rome Convention System is still alive and it is urgently necessary for the Republic of Korea to have an alternative regulation on liability for third party damages caused by aircraft, because Korea has no other rules on air carriage but general conditions of air carriage made by air carrier. Blames to the principle of strict liability of the Rome convention also is groundless because this principle was adopted by consensus all participants to the Rome Convention.
Abstract
The Ministry of Justice has completed draft of Part Ⅵ of the Korean Commercial Code, “Carriage by Air”. The international convention on air carriage such as the Montreal Convention 1999 and the Rome Convention 1952 and 1978 have affected seriously on the bill. This article discusses especially the liability for third party damages caused by aircraft. Some commentators criticise the draft because it has followed the principle [doctrine] of strict [absolute, no-fault] liability of the Rome convention. This writer has answered back in pointing that two treaties, which recently had been established by ICAO, one on the compensation for general risk damage caused by aircraft, the other one on compensation for damage from acts of unlawful interference involving aircraft, could not successfully in effect in the short future, although Both Conventions improved the old Convention/Protocol in many aspects. In the meantime, the Rome Convention System is still alive and it is urgently necessary for the Republic of Korea to have an alternative regulation on liability for third party damages caused by aircraft, because Korea has no other rules on air carriage but general conditions of air carriage made by air carrier. Blames to the principle of strict liability of the Rome convention also is groundless because this principle was adopted by consensus all participants to the Rome Convention.
참고문헌 (18)
- 김두한, "항공기운항자의 지상제3자에 대한 손해배상책임(상)－개정 로마조약과 각국의 입법례를 중심으로－", 사법행정, 24(8) (1983), 한국사법행정학회
- 김두한, "항공기운항자의 지상제3자에 대한 손해배상책임(중)－개정 로마조약과 각국의 입법례를 중심으로－", 사법행정, 24(9) (1983), 한국사법행정학회
- 김두한, "항공기운항자의 지상제3자에 대한 손해배상책임(하)－개정 로마조약과 각국의 입법례를 중심으로－", 사법행정, 24(10) (1983), 한국사법행정학회
- 김두환, "항공기사고로 인한 지상 제3자의 배상책임에 관한 ICAO 조약초안에 대한 논평과 국내입법의 방향", 한국항공우주법학회지, 21(2), pp.9~54 (2006), 한국항공우주법학회
- 김선이, "로마조약의 개정과 국내입법의 필요성에 관한 소고", 한국항공우주법학회지, 23(1), pp.3~32 (2008), 한국항공우주법학회
- 김종복, "로마조약의 현대화와 쟁점에 관한 고찰-최근 ICAO법률위원회의 논의를 중심으로-", 한국항공우주법학회지, 23(1), pp.33~53 (2008), 한국항공우주법학회
- 박헌목, "지상 제3자의 손해에 대한 공중운송인의 책임에 관한 고찰", 항공우주법학회지, 1 (1989)
- 송승헌, "항공기운항자의 민사책임 입법화에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2003
- 이강빈, "항공기에 의하여 발생된 지상 제3자의 손해에 대한 운항자의 책임", 한국항공우주법학회지, 21(1), pp.65~95 (2006), 한국항공우주법학회
- 이강빈, "항공기에 의하여 발생된 제3자 손해배상에 관한 로마협약 개정안에 대한 고찰-불법방해배상협약안과 일반위험협약안을 중심으로", 한국항공우주법학회지, 22(2), pp.27~52 (2007), 한국항공우주법학회
- 이강빈, "항공기 운항자의 지상 제3자의 손해에 대한 책임 - 로마협약 개정안 및 상법 항공운송편 제정안을 중심으로", 국제거래법연구, 17(2), pp.203~230 (2008), 국제거래법학회
- 전삼현, "항공운송법상 무과실책임", 항공우주법학회지, 4 (1992)
- Jose Tomas Baganha, "The Utilization of the World‘s Air Space and Free Outer Space in the 21st Century", The International Conference on Air and Space Policy. Law and Industry for the 21st. (Session 3: Special Subjects of International Air Transport) (1997)
- Christopher M. Petras, "An Alternative Proposal to Modernize the Liability Regime for Surface Damage Caused buy Aircraft to Address Damage Resulting from Highjackings or Other Unlawful Interference", Gonz. J. Int’l L., 10, pp.315~ (2006)
- I. H. Ph. Diederiks-Verschoor, "An Introduction to Air law, 7th Ed" (2001)
- Katsutoshi Fujita, "Some Considerations for the Modernization of the Rome Convention,in case of Unlawful Interference", 한국항공우주법학회지, 23(1), pp.55~81 (2008), 한국항공우주법학회
- Professor Stephan Hobe, "Conference on Security and Risk Management in a New Space Era: Military, Commercial, and Tourism Dimensions", Neb. L. Rev., 86, pp.439~ (2007)
- Harold Caplan, "Who Should Pay for Aerial Terrorism?", Air & Space Law, 21(3), pp.11~ (2007)