국제물품매매협약(CISG)을 적용한 우리 판결의 소개와 검토
Commentary on Some Korean Court Cases on the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods
0
조회
0
다운로드
28
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
As of March 1, 2005 the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (“CISG”) adopted by the United Nations in 1980 has become part of Korean law. Korea’s accession to CISG constitutes an epoch making event for the internationalization of the private law of Korea. As far as the author understands, up until December 31, 2010 thirteen decisions rendered by lower courts of Korea have applied CISG. In this article the author makes brief reports on those decisions and makes brief comments thereon. The analyses show that korean courts understand CISG relatively well and their decisions are generally persuasive. Having said that, some decisions leave room for further improvement. The author expects that the cases based upon CISG will increase in the near future, and hence urges Korean lawyers to make efforts to better understand CISG and apply CISG more correctly. It should also be stressed that in order to correctly understand the rights and obligations of the parties to a sales contract governed by CISG, Korean courts should not only have a good grip on CISG but also the law applicable to a sales contract which supplements CISG. A typical example is the rate applicable to the interest which a party who fails to pay the price or any other sum that is in arrears has to pay to the other party. Since CISG is silent on the applicable interest rate, the Korean courts have to decide how to set the interest rate. If they decide that there are no general principles on which CISG is based, then they have to apply the law which is applicable to the sales contract by virtue of the rules of private international law of Korea.
Abstract
As of March 1, 2005 the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (“CISG”) adopted by the United Nations in 1980 has become part of Korean law. Korea’s accession to CISG constitutes an epoch making event for the internationalization of the private law of Korea. As far as the author understands, up until December 31, 2010 thirteen decisions rendered by lower courts of Korea have applied CISG. In this article the author makes brief reports on those decisions and makes brief comments thereon. The analyses show that korean courts understand CISG relatively well and their decisions are generally persuasive. Having said that, some decisions leave room for further improvement. The author expects that the cases based upon CISG will increase in the near future, and hence urges Korean lawyers to make efforts to better understand CISG and apply CISG more correctly. It should also be stressed that in order to correctly understand the rights and obligations of the parties to a sales contract governed by CISG, Korean courts should not only have a good grip on CISG but also the law applicable to a sales contract which supplements CISG. A typical example is the rate applicable to the interest which a party who fails to pay the price or any other sum that is in arrears has to pay to the other party. Since CISG is silent on the applicable interest rate, the Korean courts have to decide how to set the interest rate. If they decide that there are no general principles on which CISG is based, then they have to apply the law which is applicable to the sales contract by virtue of the rules of private international law of Korea.
참고문헌 (26)
- 金載亨, "契約의 解除와 損害賠償의 範圍- 履行利益과 信賴利益을 중심으로", 인권과 정의, 320, pp.3~ (2003), 대한변호사협회
- 김진우, "도급계약에 있어 계약 당사자의 확정과 계약인수", 사법, 1(3), pp.259~300 (2008), 사법발전재단
- 박영복, "매매협약(CISG) 적용 사안에 있어서의 상계", 국제거래법연구, 19(1), pp.121~143 (2010), 국제거래법학회
- 서헌제, "주요국에서의 CISG의 적용과 우리의 과제 - 미국·중국·한국을 중심으로", 국제거래법연구, 18(1), pp.73~105 (2009), 국제거래법학회
- 석광현, "국제물품매매협약(CISG)을 다룬 최초의 우리 판결, ｢법률신문｣ 제3754호(2009.6.15.)", ~ (2009)
- 석광현, "국제물품매매협약(CISG)을 다룬 최초 우리 항소심판결, ｢법률신문｣ 제3781호(2009. 9. 28.)", ~ (2009)
- 석광현, "국제물품매매계약에 관한 국제연합협약(CISG)상의 본질적 계약위반", 법학논총, 23(2), pp.437~480 (2006), 법학연구소
- 석광현, "국제물품매매계약의 법리: UN통일매매법(CISG) 해설" (2010), 박영사
- 송덕수, "타인의 명의를 빌려 체결한 토지분양계약의 효력", 민사판례연구, 14 (1992)
- 신명균, "輸出代行者의 責任", 涉外事件의 諸問題(上) 재판자료, 33 (1986)
- 신창섭, "Korea’s Joining the CISG Regime And Its Implications In Terms of Forming Legal Framework Governing International Sales Transactions In the Ease-Asian Region, in 橫川李基秀先生停年紀念 논문집 세계화시대의 기업법" (2010)
- 양승태, "外國金錢債權의 履行에 따르는 諸問題, in 涉外事件의 諸問題 (下)", 裁判資料, 34 (1986)
- 윤진수, "債務不履行으로 인한 特別損害, 同時履行의 抗辯權과 權利濫用", 대법원판례해설, (17) (1992)
- 이공현, "외화채권의 변제", 민사판례연구, 14 (1992)
- 이헌묵, "국제적 상계에 대한 준거법", 국제거래법연구, 18(1), pp.131~161 (2009), 국제거래법학회
- 이헌묵, "국제거래에서 판매점계약(Distribution Agreement)의 판매자의 보상청구권에 관한 비교법적 고찰", 국제거래법연구, 19(2), pp.203~222 (2010), 국제거래법학회
- 최공웅, "국제소송" (1994), 육법사
- 최흥섭, "국제물품매매계약에 관한 유엔협약 해설" (2005), 법무부
- Walther J. Habscheid, "입증책임과 입증의 정도－대륙법과 영국법의 비교", 서울대법학, 32(1)통권 : 85 (1991)
- Bianca, C. M., "Commentary on the International Sales Law", The 1980 Vienna Sales Convention (1987), Giuffrè
- Fawcett, James, "International Sale of Goods in the Conflict of Laws" (2005), Oxford Univ. Press
- Gäbel, Johannes K., "Neuere Probleme zur Aufrechnung im internationalen Privatrecht" (1983), Verlag V. Florenz GmbH
- Geimer, Reinhold, "Internationales Zivilprozessrecht, 6. Auflage, Köln, Dr. Otto Schmidt", ~ (2009)
- Honnold, John O., "Uniform Law for International Sales, Third Edition" (1998), Kluwer Law International
- Schlechtriem, Peter, "Kommentar zum Einheitlichen UNKaufrecht- CISG-, 5. Auflage" (2008), C.H. Beck
- von Staudinger, J., "Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch mit Einführungsgesetz und Nebengesetzen Wiener UN-Kaufrecht (CISG)" (2005), Sellier-de Gruyter