제7차와 2009개정 과학 교육과정에 따른 중․고등학교 교과서 내진화단원의 연계성 분석
A Study on Connectivity of the Unit of Evolution between Secondary School Biology Textbooks Reformed according to the 7th and 2009 Revised Korea National Science Curriculum
0
조회
0
다운로드
15
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
A purpose of this study was to research how the units of evolution in biology textbooks developedaccording to the 7th and 2009 Korea National Science Curriculum were connected. Contents, inquiryactivities and illustrations of the biology textbooks were analyzed by methods of Framework ofevolution key concepts, an analysis table of research activities, an analysis table of illustrations, anda model analysis standard based on connectivity after revised and complimented properly to fit thisstudy. There were gaps and repetitions rather than development in the biology textbooks accordingto the 7th and 2009 Korea National Science Curriculum. By the 2009 Curriculum of Korea Institute,all the curriculums became an optional course which means that the connectivity could beremarkably different whether students select integrated science or life science II for their high schoolclasses. The worst case would be that a student will not select both of them, then evolutionconceptions would be in basic or never educated for the students. In other words, we were not ableto find developmental connectivity in evolution units of current curriculum but could find that suchan important evolution units has been carelessly managed until now and scaled down continuously.
Abstract
A purpose of this study was to research how the units of evolution in biology textbooks developedaccording to the 7th and 2009 Korea National Science Curriculum were connected. Contents, inquiryactivities and illustrations of the biology textbooks were analyzed by methods of Framework ofevolution key concepts, an analysis table of research activities, an analysis table of illustrations, anda model analysis standard based on connectivity after revised and complimented properly to fit thisstudy. There were gaps and repetitions rather than development in the biology textbooks accordingto the 7th and 2009 Korea National Science Curriculum. By the 2009 Curriculum of Korea Institute,all the curriculums became an optional course which means that the connectivity could beremarkably different whether students select integrated science or life science II for their high schoolclasses. The worst case would be that a student will not select both of them, then evolutionconceptions would be in basic or never educated for the students. In other words, we were not ableto find developmental connectivity in evolution units of current curriculum but could find that suchan important evolution units has been carelessly managed until now and scaled down continuously.
참고문헌 (36)
- Alters, B. J., "Perspective: teaching evolution in higher education", Evolution, 56(10), pp.1891~1901 (2002)
- Asghar, A. W., "The origin and evolution of life in Pakistani high school Bology", Journal of Biological Education, 44(2), pp.65~71 (2010)
- Bishop, B. A., "Student conceptions of natural slection and its role in evolution", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, pp.415~427 (1990)
- Ching-Soong, B., "The inclusion of STS material in the most frequently used secondary science textbooks in the U. S", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(4), pp.339~349 (1993)
- Choi, K., "The development of evaluating framework for a science textbook in a secondary school", Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 16(3), pp.303~313 (1996)
- Chun, G., "A comparison analysis of connectivity in units of life science and heredity according to 2009 Revised Korea National Science Curriculum", 석사, pp.2012
- Clough, M. P., "Diminish students' resistance to biology", The American Biology Teacher, 56(7), pp.409~415 (1994)
- Dobzhansky, T., "Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution", The American Biology Teacher, 35(3), pp.125~129 (1973)
- Evans, E. M., "Conceptual change and evolutionary biology: A developmental analysis, In International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change", pp.263~294 (2008), Routledge
- 하민수, "TV 만화와 아동 과학 도서에 의한 진화의 오개념 분석", 초등과학교육, 25(4), pp.352~362 (2006), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 하민수, "진화 기작에 관한 설명의 질적 횡단 연구", 생물교육, 35(1), pp.106~116 (2007), 한국생물교육학회
- 하민수, "생물 전공자와 비전공자의 진화에 관한 개념, 흥미, 수용 및 종교성에 관한 연구", 생물교육, 38(3), pp.467~475 (2010), 한국생물교육학회
- Kennedy, D., "Teaching about Evolution and the Nature of Science" (1998), National Academy Press
- Kim, H., "Analysis of evolutionary contents in high school biology curriculum and textbooks", 박사, pp.2001
- Kim, H., "A study on connection of the biology part in the textbook of middle school and high school according to the 7th education course", 석사, pp.2002
- 김학현, "고등학교 생물교과서에서 진화가 차지하는 비중", 생물교육, 30(2), pp.158~165 (2002), 한국생물교육학회
- Lee, E., "A comparative analytic study on「The evolution and variety of organisms」in biology curricula of elementary, middle and high school", 석사, pp.1992
- 이미숙, "과학사적 진화개념 발달 단계에 기초한 초등학생들의 진화 개념 분석", 초등과학교육, 24(2), pp.145~159 (2005), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 이순남, "생물학에서 진화론의 역할에 관한 현직 과학 교사들의 인식", 생물교육, 39(2), pp.181~195 (2011), 한국생물교육학회
- No, Y., "A Study of connectivity of biology continuity part in middle and high school textbooks", 석사, pp.2006
- Ministry of Education, "Science Curriculum" (1997), Ministry of Education
- NAS(National Academy of Science), "Teaching about Evolution and the Nature of Science" (1998), National Academy Press
- NSTA(National Science Teachers Association), "NSTA Position Statement: The Teaching of Evolution" (2003), Wilson Boulevard
- NRC(National Research Council), "National Science Education Standards" (1996), National Academy Press
- Nehm, R. H., "Does increasing biology teacher knowledge of evolution and the nature of science lead to greater preference for the teaching of evolution in schools?", Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(5), pp.699~723 (2007)
- Nickels M. K., "Better biology teaching by emphasizing evolution and the nature of science", The American Biology Teacher, 58(6), pp.332~336 (1996)
- Park, G., "(A) study on the connection of biology in elementary, middle and high school", 석사, pp.2002
- Rutledge, M. L., "Knowledge structure, acceptance and teaching of evolution", The American Biology Teacher, 64(1), pp.21~28 (2002)
- Rutledge, M. L., "Reliability of the measure of acceptance of the theory of evolution (MATE) Instrument with University Students", The American Biology Teacher, 69(6), pp.332~335 (2007)
- Rutledge, M. L., "Science and high school biology teachers : Critical relationships", The American Biology Teacher, 64(1), pp.21~28 (2000)
- Smith, M. U., "Current status of research in teaching and learning: Ⅱ. Pedagogical issues", Science & Education, 19, pp.539~571 (2010)
- Sober, E., "Pilisophy of Biology", pp.1~26 (1993), Oxford University Press
- Song, S., "Development and application of an analysis taxonomy for curricular articulation in mathematics and science", Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 11(2), pp.119~122 (1991)
- Swarts, F. A., "Evolution in secondary school biology textbooks of the PRC, USA, and the latter stages of USSR", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, pp.475~505 (1994)
- Todd, D., "The treatment of geological time & the history of life on earth in high school biology textbooks", The American Biology Teacher, 69(7), pp.401~405 (2007)
- Zabel, J., "Learning progress in evolution theory: Climbing a ladder or roaming a landscape?", Journal of Biological Education, 45(3), pp.143~149 (2011)