Analysis in Research PRODUCTIVITY in the Hospitality Area
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This study has the following three purposes. First, this study compares the results of research by Kim et al.(2013) with the results of this study and analyzes how much tourism and hospitality professionals have contributed to the academia since 2010. Second, this study analyzes the contribution of researchers according to their positions. Third, the targeted subjects of this study are English-written journals. This study analyzes whether the group of researchers who speak English as their mother language has a high contribution to English-speaking journals or whether the group of non-English-speaking researchers is high. Method: This study carries out the analysis using the research methods of Sheldon(1991) and Kim et al.(2013). The journals for the analysis of research productivity for this study were selected as Journal of Travel Research, Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, and Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research listed in the Social Science Citation Index(SSCI). Information on all research papers published from 2000 to 2015 was collected from the three journals, and analyses of authorship and research productivity were conducted. Results: The results of the study are as follows. First, there is no big difference between the tourism and hospitality researchers in the contribution of the three journals over the period. However, it is evident that the degree of contribution of non-tourism and non-hospitality professionals to academic journals increased by about 5% over the five years from 2011 to 2015. Second, although there are somewhat differences by journals, it was analyzed that overall, the group of full professors showed higher productivity of research papers than the group of associate and assistant professors. Third, even though they are non-English-speaking researchers, non-English-speaking researchers consistently contribute to English-speaking journals. Conclusion: Based on the results, this study comes to a conclusion that academic interactions between tourism and hospitality fields and other disciplines are increasing, so many topics that are able to be linked to other disciplines and tourism and hospitality fields should be discussed for academic development. Also, this study shows a contradiction that is the expectation that research productivity in the group of assistant professors is higher than other positions for reasons such as tenured position. Lastly, this study turns out that the productivity of non-English-speaking researchers is significant even in English-written journals.
Abstract
Purpose: This study has the following three purposes. First, this study compares the results of research by Kim et al.(2013) with the results of this study and analyzes how much tourism and hospitality professionals have contributed to the academia since 2010. Second, this study analyzes the contribution of researchers according to their positions. Third, the targeted subjects of this study are English-written journals. This study analyzes whether the group of researchers who speak English as their mother language has a high contribution to English-speaking journals or whether the group of non-English-speaking researchers is high. Method: This study carries out the analysis using the research methods of Sheldon(1991) and Kim et al.(2013). The journals for the analysis of research productivity for this study were selected as Journal of Travel Research, Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, and Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research listed in the Social Science Citation Index(SSCI). Information on all research papers published from 2000 to 2015 was collected from the three journals, and analyses of authorship and research productivity were conducted. Results: The results of the study are as follows. First, there is no big difference between the tourism and hospitality researchers in the contribution of the three journals over the period. However, it is evident that the degree of contribution of non-tourism and non-hospitality professionals to academic journals increased by about 5% over the five years from 2011 to 2015. Second, although there are somewhat differences by journals, it was analyzed that overall, the group of full professors showed higher productivity of research papers than the group of associate and assistant professors. Third, even though they are non-English-speaking researchers, non-English-speaking researchers consistently contribute to English-speaking journals. Conclusion: Based on the results, this study comes to a conclusion that academic interactions between tourism and hospitality fields and other disciplines are increasing, so many topics that are able to be linked to other disciplines and tourism and hospitality fields should be discussed for academic development. Also, this study shows a contradiction that is the expectation that research productivity in the group of assistant professors is higher than other positions for reasons such as tenured position. Lastly, this study turns out that the productivity of non-English-speaking researchers is significant even in English-written journals.
참고문헌 (30)
- Pearce PL, "Tourism: Bridges Across Continents" (1998), McGraw-hill
- Dann G, "Methodology in Tourism Research", Annals of Tourism Research, 15(1), pp.1~28 (1988)
- Dundar H, "Determinants of Research Productivity in Higher Education", Research in Higher Education, 39(6), pp.607~631 (1998)
- Annals of Tourism Research, "An Emerging Discipline", 27(3), pp.805~809 (2000)
- Tribe J, "The Indiscipline of Tourism", Annals of Tourism Research, 24(3), pp.638~657 (1997)
- Tribe J, "Indisciplined and Unsubstantiated", Annals of Tourism Research, 27(3), pp.809~813 (2000)
- Goeldner CR, "Tourism: Principles, Practices, Philosophies" (2003), Wiley
- Pearce DG, "Tourism Research: Critiques and Challenges" (1993), Routledge
- Baird L, "Publication Productivity in Doctoral Research Departments: Interdisciplinary and Intradisciplinary Factors", Research in Higher Education, 32(3), pp.303~318 (1991)
- Bentley R, "Changes in Academic Research Performance Over Time: A Study of Institutional Accumulative Advantage", Research in Higher Education, 31(4), pp.327~353 (1990)
- Jafari J, "Toward a Framework for Tourism Education: Problems and Prospects", Annals of Tourism Research, 8(1), pp.13~34 (1981)
- Jeon Kyeong-deok, "Analysis of Domestic Research Trend in Self-Leadership Found among NURSING Students in Republic of KOREA", International Journal of Crisis & Safety, 3(4), pp.1~9 (2018), J-INSTITUTE
- Kim Ji-su, "Research Trend of SPORT Nutrition Science in the Republic of KOREA", Kinesiology, 1(1), pp.1~7 (2016), J-INSTITUTE
- Leiper N, "Towards a Cohesive Curriculum Tourism: The Case for a Distinct Discipline", Annals of Tourism Research, 8(1), pp.69~84 (1981)
- 남재성, "A Study on Canada’s Response Systems for TERRORISM and Emerging Trends", International Journal of Terrorism & National Security, 5(1), pp.13~24 (2020), J-INSTITUTE
- Oh Hyoung-keun, "Trend in and Strategic Implementation Plan for the International Development COOPERATION through SPORTS", Kinesiology, 3(2), pp.16~25 (2018), J-INSTITUTE
- 양승돈, "Review of Trend Analysis of TERRORISM and KOREA's Implications", International Journal of Terrorism & National Security, 5(1), pp.40~47 (2020), J-INSTITUTE
- Smith VL, "Hosts and Guests Revisited: Tourism Issues of the 21st Century" (2001), Cognizant Communication Corp
- Sheldon PJ, "An Authorship Analysis of Tourism Research", Annals of Tourism Research, 18(3), pp.473~484 (1991)
- Kim H, "Research Productivity of Academic Professionals in Tourism and Hospitality", Journal of Tourism and Hospitality, 1(2), pp.67~74 (2013)
- Feldman K, "Research Productivity and Scholarly Accomplishment of College Teachers as Related to Their Instructional Effectiveness: A Review and Exploration", Research in Higher Education, 26(3), pp.227~298 (1987)
- Echtner CM, "The Disciplinary Dilemma of Tourism Studies", Annals of Tourism Research, 24(4), pp.868~883 (1997)
- Jordan JM, "Effects of Department Size and Organization on the Research Productivity of Academic Economists", Economics of Education Review, 7(2), pp.251~255 (1988)
- Levin S, "Age and Research Productivity of Academic Scientists", Research in Higher Education, 30(5), pp.531~549 (1989)
- Miller JC, "Rates of Publication per Faculty Member in Forty-five Rated Economics Departments", Economic Inquiry, 13(1), pp.122~123 (1975)
- Tien FF, "Faculty Rank System, Research Motivation, and Faculty Research Productivity: Measure Refinement and Theory Testing", The Journal of Higher Education, 67(1), pp.2~22 (1996)
- Toutkoushian R, "Using Publications Counts to Measure an Institution's Research Productivity", Research in Higher Education, 44(2), pp.121~148 (2003)
- Wanner RA, "Research Productivity in Academia: A Comparative Study of the Sciences, Social Sciences and Humanities", Sociology of Education, 54(4), pp.238~253 (1981)
- Creswell JW, "Measuring Faculty Research Performance" (1986), Jossey-bass