본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

학생의 성격 유형을 고려한 초등 과학 모둠 활동에서 창발성 발현 사례 분석

Case Analyses of the Emergent Properties expressed in Group Activities according to Student’s Personality Types in Elementary School Science

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

The present study was designed to examine the effects organization of small groups according to the student’s personality types on elementary science learning and emergent properties. Emergent property is defined as a phenomenon whereby novel entities arise through interactions among component entities such that the novel entities exhibit properties the component entities do not exhibit. The sample was composed of 20 students in Grade 4 at ‘G’ elementary school in Seoul. The three groups were formed as introvert, extrovert, and introvert/extrovert (mixed) groups according to student’s personality types. During the cooperative activities, a series of data were obtained and compared in terms of expression of emergent properties. The discourses occurred within each group were recorded and the interviews were performed and analyzed in an attempt to see how the way of organization of groups according to student’s personality types and the cooperative activities in science are interrelated. The students of extrovert group presented quickly and actively new alternatives in the situations of opinion disagreement. And the opinions of the students with poor peer relationships were often ignored in cooperative processes. The introvert group seldom expressed active interaction and so emergent properties. Also, the introvert leaders in the introvert/extrovert groups didn’t induce emergent properties a lot. The introvert group showed distribution type of cooperative learning. On the other hand, the extrovert group showed the emergent type of cooperative learning more frequently. The present study concludes that we should consider the personality types and peer relations of the students in designing and executing the cooperative learning in the elementary school science.

Abstract

The present study was designed to examine the effects organization of small groups according to the student’s personality types on elementary science learning and emergent properties. Emergent property is defined as a phenomenon whereby novel entities arise through interactions among component entities such that the novel entities exhibit properties the component entities do not exhibit. The sample was composed of 20 students in Grade 4 at ‘G’ elementary school in Seoul. The three groups were formed as introvert, extrovert, and introvert/extrovert (mixed) groups according to student’s personality types. During the cooperative activities, a series of data were obtained and compared in terms of expression of emergent properties. The discourses occurred within each group were recorded and the interviews were performed and analyzed in an attempt to see how the way of organization of groups according to student’s personality types and the cooperative activities in science are interrelated. The students of extrovert group presented quickly and actively new alternatives in the situations of opinion disagreement. And the opinions of the students with poor peer relationships were often ignored in cooperative processes. The introvert group seldom expressed active interaction and so emergent properties. Also, the introvert leaders in the introvert/extrovert groups didn’t induce emergent properties a lot. The introvert group showed distribution type of cooperative learning. On the other hand, the extrovert group showed the emergent type of cooperative learning more frequently. The present study concludes that we should consider the personality types and peer relations of the students in designing and executing the cooperative learning in the elementary school science.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. 교육과학기술부, "초등학교 과학 4-2 교사용 지도서" (2010), 미래엔 주식회사
  2. 구양삼, "토론을 강조한 MBL실험수업에서 리더 유형에 따른 언어적 상호작용 특성", 대한화학회지, 50(6), pp.494~505 (2006), 대한화학회
  3. 김균희, "유아 간 발생하는 또래갈등과정 분석", 한국보육지원학회지, 2(2), pp.165~185 (2006)
  4. 김이원, "초등 과학에 대한 협동학습에서 사회적 상호작용과 창발성 발현의 관계", 석사, 초등과학교육, pp.2010
  5. 김찬종, "과학교육학개론" (1999), 북스힐
  6. 노성인, "사회적 상호작용을 강조한 초등과학수업이 창발성 발현과 자기효능감에 미치는 효과", 석사, 초등과학교육, pp.2007
  7. 도승이, "협동학습에서 과제와 사회적 요소의 작용:조원 간 친밀한 소집단을 중심으로", 교육심리연구, 21(4), pp.1047~1070 (2007), 한국교육심리학회
  8. 류수영, "웹기반 온라인 토론에서 모둠구성방식이 토론에 미치는 영향", 컴퓨터교육학회 논문지, 4(2), pp.31~39 (2001)
  9. 박윤미, "웹 기반 협동 학습에서 아동의 성격유형에 따른 모둠 구성이 학업 성취도 및 상호작용에 미치는 영향", 석사, 초등교육방법, pp.2006
  10. 박현주, "사회적 상호작용 강화 초등과학수업의 창발성 발현에 대한 정량적 분석", 석사, 초등과학교육, pp.2010
  11. 배진호, "과학교육에서 두뇌학습원리에 기초한 창발수업모형의 개발", 박사, 과학교육, pp.1999
  12. 이예린, "뇌기능 개인차에 기초한 이질집단에서 나타나는 아이디어-공유-창출 과정 사례연구", 석사, 초등교육학과 초등과학교육전공, pp.2012
  13. 임채성, "협동 학습의 대뇌 생물학적 기초: 아이디어-공유- 창출 모델", 한국생물교육학회지, 25(2), pp.143~155 (1997)
  14. 임채성, "생명 현상에 대한 정보 제공 유형에 따른 초등학교 학생의 협동적 의미 구성", 생물교육, 36(4), pp.512~522 (2008), 한국생물교육학회
  15. 지광훈, "‘식물의 세계’ 단원 학습에서 초등학생의 성격유형을 고려한 모둠 구성이과학 태도, 과학 탐구 기능, 과학 지식에 미치는 효과", 생물교육, 42(4), pp.439~449 (2014), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
  16. 현승자, "초등 과학수업에서 상호작용 강화 협동학습이 창발성의 발현과 과학학습에 미치는 효과", 석사, 초등과학교육, pp.2007
  17. Barkley, E. F., "Collaborative Learning Techniques: A Handbook for College Faculty" (2014), John Wiley & Sons
  18. Brandler, S., "Group Work: Skills and Strategies for Effective Interventions" (2015), Routledge
  19. Cook, L. M., "Collaborative groups both help and hurt learning, but group composition has no effect on a group's success or failure as defined by personality characteristics", University of North Georgia Annual Research Conference (2014)
  20. Damper, R. I., "Emergence and levels of abstraction", International Journal of Systems Science, 31(7), pp.811~818 (2000)
  21. Dega, B. G., "Students' conceptual change in electricity and magnetism using simulations: A comparison of cognitive perturbation and cognitive conflict", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(6), pp.677~698 (2013)
  22. Dreyfus, A., "Applying the “cognitive conflict” strategy for conceptual changesome implications, difficulties, and problems", Science Education, 74(5), pp.555~569 (1990)
  23. Driver, R., "Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom", Educational Researcher, 23(7), pp.5~12 (1994)
  24. Guzzetti, B. J., "Learning counter-intuitive science concepts: What have we learned from over a decade of research?", Reading & Writing Quarterly, 16(2), pp.89~98 (2000)
  25. Jung, J. H., "The moderating effect of extraversion–introversion differences on group idea generation performance", Small Group Research, 43(1), pp.30~49 (2012)
  26. Kagan, M., "협동 학습-학급세우기" (2007), 디모데
  27. Knorr-Cetina, K. D., "The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science" (2013), Elsevier
  28. Meisgeier, C., "Manual: Murphy- Meisgeier Type Indicator for Children" (1987), Counsulting Psychologists Press Inc
  29. Nagasundaram, M., "When a group is not a group: The cognitive foundation of group idea generation", Small Group Research, 24, pp.463~489 (1993)
  30. Nijstad, B. A., "Cognitive stimulation and interference in groups : Exposure effects in an idea generation task", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, pp.535~544 (2002)
  31. Sharm. S., "Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research and Practice" (1999), Allyn & Bacon
  32. Stenlund, T., "Group discussions and test-enhanced learning: Individual learning outcomes and personality characteristics", Educational Psychology, 37(2), pp.1~15 (2016)
  33. Taggar, S., "Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: A multilevel model", Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), pp.315~330 (2002)
  34. Thijs, G. D., "Cognitive effects of science experiments focusing on students’ preconceptions of force: A comparison of demonstrations and small group practicals", International Journal of Science Education, 17(3), pp.311~323 (1995)
  35. Topping, K. J., "Trends in peer learning", Educational Psychology, 25(6), pp.631~645 (2005)
  36. Wageman, R., "As the twig is bent: How group values shape emergent task interdependence in groups", Organization Science, 16(6), pp.687~700 (2005)
  37. Yellen, R. E., "Ex traversion and introversion in electronically-supported meeting", Information & Management, 28(1), pp.63~74 (1995)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)