본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한말·일제시대 최남선의 문명·문화론

Choi Nam-son's discuss on the civilization and Korean culture during 1900s∼1940s

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

In early 20th century Korea, a 'cultural movement' aimed at the enrichment of cultural potential through publishing news papers and magazines was championed by Korean nationalists struggling against the invasion of Japanese Imperialism. At that time, civilization and enlightenment was one of the most favored words on the lips of Korean intellectuals. The Korean nationalist elite's model of civilization and enlightenment was Western. With this in mind, I want to read Choi Nam- son(1890-1957) and his publication activities around from 1900s to 1940s. Serving as journalist, poet, and historian through his whole life, Choi strove to propagate the civilization('new culture') to Korean society and Korean culture to the extent that he named his own publishing house Sinmunkwan(新文館) in 1908 and ChosonKwangmunhoe(朝鮮光文會) in 1911. Through his two publishing houses, Choi set about the challenging and arduous work of inventing Korean 'tradition' or culture. At that time the standard of selection of Korean tradition based on the Western view. During the 1920s, that is after colonial period, his interest on the 'new culture' changed into the 'Korean Studies' on Korean's origin such as Dangun(檀君). It was the reason that existed in his critical view on the Western civilization which leading the First World War. And culture or civilization was essential slogan of not only Korean intellectuals but also for imperial Japan in its rule of the colony. Based on the self-confidence of Korean nation(民族), he contented with the Other (Japanese Korean studies) and the universalism(the West) Key Words: Choi, Nam-son, civilization, culture, Korean Studies, Manchuria After the Manchuria invasion of Japan, Choi's view on the key role of the East was changed into from Korea to Japan. Even though his reconstruction of Korean traditional culture was evaluated highly, but his conception of culture depended upon the dichotomy of civilization and barbarism. He emphasized not only culture against Japan but also civilization against the other East nations. Analyzing these topics, I will help deepen our understanding of Korean nationalist's cultural activities and the origin of the Korean Studies.

Abstract

In early 20th century Korea, a 'cultural movement' aimed at the enrichment of cultural potential through publishing news papers and magazines was championed by Korean nationalists struggling against the invasion of Japanese Imperialism. At that time, civilization and enlightenment was one of the most favored words on the lips of Korean intellectuals. The Korean nationalist elite's model of civilization and enlightenment was Western. With this in mind, I want to read Choi Nam- son(1890-1957) and his publication activities around from 1900s to 1940s. Serving as journalist, poet, and historian through his whole life, Choi strove to propagate the civilization('new culture') to Korean society and Korean culture to the extent that he named his own publishing house Sinmunkwan(新文館) in 1908 and ChosonKwangmunhoe(朝鮮光文會) in 1911. Through his two publishing houses, Choi set about the challenging and arduous work of inventing Korean 'tradition' or culture. At that time the standard of selection of Korean tradition based on the Western view. During the 1920s, that is after colonial period, his interest on the 'new culture' changed into the 'Korean Studies' on Korean's origin such as Dangun(檀君). It was the reason that existed in his critical view on the Western civilization which leading the First World War. And culture or civilization was essential slogan of not only Korean intellectuals but also for imperial Japan in its rule of the colony. Based on the self-confidence of Korean nation(民族), he contented with the Other (Japanese Korean studies) and the universalism(the West) Key Words: Choi, Nam-son, civilization, culture, Korean Studies, Manchuria After the Manchuria invasion of Japan, Choi's view on the key role of the East was changed into from Korea to Japan. Even though his reconstruction of Korean traditional culture was evaluated highly, but his conception of culture depended upon the dichotomy of civilization and barbarism. He emphasized not only culture against Japan but also civilization against the other East nations. Analyzing these topics, I will help deepen our understanding of Korean nationalist's cultural activities and the origin of the Korean Studies.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. 사카이 나오키, "번역과 주체", pp.103~144 (2005), 이산
  2. 김현주, "이광수와 문화의 기획", pp.13~26 (2005), 태학사
  3. Duglas R. Howland, "Translation the West", pp.38~ (2003), Univ. of Hawaii Press
  4. 베네딕트 앤더슨, "상상의 공동체", pp.249~ (2002), 나남출판
  5. 한기형, "최남선의 잡지 발간과 초기 근대문학의 재편-『소년』, 『청춘』의 문학사적 역할과 위상", 대동문화연구, 11(45), pp.221~260 (2004), 대동문화연구원
  6. 한기형, "근대어의 형성과 매체의 언어전략 - 언어, 매체, 식민체제, 근대문학의 상관성", 역사비평, (71), pp.356~377 (2005), 역사문제연구소
  7. 류시현, "출판물을 통한 신학문의 수용과 '근대'의 전파", 한국독립운동사연구, (26), pp.143~168 (2006), 한국독립운동사연구소
  8. 류준필, "1910~20년대 초 한국에서 자국학 이념의 형성 과정 ― 최남선과 안확을 중심으로", 대동문화연구, (52), pp.35~61 (2005), 대동문화연구원
  9. 김현주, "문화사의 이념과 서사전략―1900~20년대 최남선의 문화사 담론 연구", 대동문화연구, 12(58), pp.225~256 (2007), 대동문화연구원
  10. 이영화, "최남선의 역사학", pp.61~66 (2003), 경인문화사
  11. 전성곤, "만주 ?건국대학? 창설과 최남선의 <건국신화론>", 일어일문학연구, 56(2), pp.165~186 (2006), 한국일어일문학회
  12. 강해수, "최남선의 만몽인식과 제국의 욕망", 역사비평, (76), pp.58~89 (2006), 역사문제연구소
  13. 고사카 시로, "근대라는 아포리아", pp.20~35 (2007), 이학사
  14. 兪吉濬, "西遊見聞", 194~ (1895)
  15. "서우", ~
  16. "청춘", ~
  17. 최남선, "書齋閑談", 새벽 (1954)
  18. 육당전집편찬위원회, "육당최남선전집" (1974), 현암사
  19. 최남선, "국가의 주동력", 대한유학생학보, 2, pp.4~ (1907)
  20. "소년 2-1", ~ (1909)
  21. 崔南善撰, "시문독본" (1916), 신문관
  22. 박찬승, "한국근대정치사상사연구", pp.111~165 (1992), 역사비평사
  23. 최남선, "妙音觀世音", 불교, 50·51, pp.63~64 (1928)
  24. 오영섭, "朝鮮光文會 硏究", 韓國史學史學報, (3), pp.79~140 (2001), 한국사학사학회
  25. "매일신보", ~
  26. 이광수, "우리의 이상", 학지광, 14, pp.1~9 (1917)
  27. 이돈화, "최근 조선사회운동의 二三", 개벽, 2, pp.18~19 (1920)
  28. 고마고메 다케시, "식민지제국 일본의 문화통합" (2008), 역사비평사
  29. 최남선, "헌신적 정신", 태극학보, 1, pp.17~ (1906)
  30. "동명", ~
  31. 김병걸, "친일문학작품선집", pp.104~111 (1988), 실천문학사
  32. 최남선, "神ながらの昔を憶ふ", 동아민족문화 협회 팜플렛 3집, ~ (1934)
  33. "재만조선인통신", ~
  34. 최남선, "東方古民族의 神聖觀念", 삼천리, 13(6), pp.88~ (1941)
  35. 윤희탁, "일제하 ‘만주국’ 연구", pp.319~326 (1996), 일조각
  36. 최남선, "전쟁과 교육", 삼천리, 11(7), pp.58~60 (1939)
  37. 최남선, "道義는 이긴다", 放送之友, 2(3), pp.16~19 (1944)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)