본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

정유재란기 명량해전의 주요쟁점과 승리요인 재검토

Overviews of Controversies and How Chosun Navy Gained Victory Over The Myeongryang Sea Battle(鳴梁海戰) During The Jungujaeran(1597∼1598)

0

조회

0

다운로드

11

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

This research deals with the actual facts over The Battle of Myeongryang. Being one of the most decisive engagements of the Jungujaeran Period (the Japanese invasions of Korea;1597∼1598), The Battle of Myeongryang(1597), has given rise to legends of the Chosun navy who fought against the Japanese fleet, taking consideration, the number of ships on both sides, battle areas, influences of the currents, and the naval strategies during Imjinwaeran(the Japanese invasions of Korea ;1592-1598). The purpose of this research to verify the four actual facts and the other four (detrimental) factors, leading to the defeat of the Japanese in The Battle of Myeongryang. The results of the study in four actual facts are as follows: Firstly, when a fleet of more than 200 Japanese ships arrived at the Myeongryang waterway, it is believed that 130 ships were sent to fight in the constricted areas of the waterway while there were only 13 Korean Pan-ok ships(板屋船) along with around 100 Hahng ships (鄕船 refuge or foraged ships). Secondly, the actual battle areas starts from Yang Island(洋島) and reaches the farther northwest waters which is not the narrowest area of the Myeongryang waterway. Thirdly, the tide turned northwest at 06:38 and southeast at 13:00. Lastly, the underwater thwart metal-chain-ambush is simply a legend, instead the Chosun Navy employed crush-and-burn tactics along with the most effective battle line and Korean cannons. The results of the study in four factors contributing its victory are as follows: The first factor, the battle line taken the lead by Pan-ok ships and Korean arms and weapons including cannons. The second factor, efficient naval man-power and its heated fighting morale credited to Admiral Yi.(李舜臣1545∼1598) The third factor, adequately implemented diverse naval strategies. The fourth factor, volunteer soldiers mobilized with the refuge boats. The most noteworthy fact, however, in this battle was the interconnectedness of all factors combined.

Abstract

This research deals with the actual facts over The Battle of Myeongryang. Being one of the most decisive engagements of the Jungujaeran Period (the Japanese invasions of Korea;1597∼1598), The Battle of Myeongryang(1597), has given rise to legends of the Chosun navy who fought against the Japanese fleet, taking consideration, the number of ships on both sides, battle areas, influences of the currents, and the naval strategies during Imjinwaeran(the Japanese invasions of Korea ;1592-1598). The purpose of this research to verify the four actual facts and the other four (detrimental) factors, leading to the defeat of the Japanese in The Battle of Myeongryang. The results of the study in four actual facts are as follows: Firstly, when a fleet of more than 200 Japanese ships arrived at the Myeongryang waterway, it is believed that 130 ships were sent to fight in the constricted areas of the waterway while there were only 13 Korean Pan-ok ships(板屋船) along with around 100 Hahng ships (鄕船 refuge or foraged ships). Secondly, the actual battle areas starts from Yang Island(洋島) and reaches the farther northwest waters which is not the narrowest area of the Myeongryang waterway. Thirdly, the tide turned northwest at 06:38 and southeast at 13:00. Lastly, the underwater thwart metal-chain-ambush is simply a legend, instead the Chosun Navy employed crush-and-burn tactics along with the most effective battle line and Korean cannons. The results of the study in four factors contributing its victory are as follows: The first factor, the battle line taken the lead by Pan-ok ships and Korean arms and weapons including cannons. The second factor, efficient naval man-power and its heated fighting morale credited to Admiral Yi.(李舜臣1545∼1598) The third factor, adequately implemented diverse naval strategies. The fourth factor, volunteer soldiers mobilized with the refuge boats. The most noteworthy fact, however, in this battle was the interconnectedness of all factors combined.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. 李炯錫, "壬辰戰亂史(下卷)", pp.1032~1039 (1974), 壬辰戰亂史刊行委員會
  2. 崔碩男, "韓國水軍活動史", pp.253~266 (1965), 鳴洋社
  3. 崔碩男, "救國의 名將 李舜臣 (下)", pp.288~385 (1992), 교학사
  4. 趙成都, "鳴梁海戰硏究", 軍史, (4) (1982), 국방부 전사편찬위원회
  5. 趙成都, "鳴梁海戰硏究, In 鳴梁大捷의 再照明" (1987), 해남문화원‧해남군
  6. "李忠武公全書", ~
  7. 趙湲來, "壬亂海戰의 勝因과 全羅沿海民의 抗戰, In 鳴梁大捷의 再照明" (1987), 해남문화원‧해남군
  8. 靑柳綱太郞, "征韓役日韓史蹟 제35편", 鳴洋峽, 146~
  9. "顯武公實記", ~
  10. "湖南節義錄", ~
  11. 최두환, "鳴梁海戰과 강강수월래, In 龜海 趙成都敎授華甲紀念 忠武公李舜臣硏究論叢" (1991), 海軍士官學校 博物館
  12. "亂中日記", ~
  13. 金一相, "鳴梁海戰의 戰術的 考察, In 壬亂水軍活動硏究論叢" (1993), 海軍軍史硏究室
  14. 이민웅, "명량해전의 경과와 주요 쟁점 고찰", 군사, (47), pp.181~208 (2002), 국방부군사편찬연구소
  15. 박혜일, "李舜臣의 鳴梁海戰", 정신문화연구, 25(3), pp.115~153 (2002), 한국학중앙연구원
  16. 參謀本部, "日本戰史 朝鮮役", 本編, ~ (1924)
  17. 佐藤和夫, "海と水軍の日本史 下卷" (1995), 原書房
  18. 宇田川武久, "日本の海賊", pp.265~ (1983), 誠文堂新光社
  19. 北島万次, "壬辰倭亂と秀吉․島津․李舜臣" (2002), 校倉書房
  20. 이민웅, "임진왜란 해전사", pp.229~232 (2004), 청어람미디어
  21. 영천전통문화연구소, "海蘇實紀-국역본", 72~78 (1987)
  22. "宣祖實錄", ~
  23. "宣祖修正實錄 권31 선조 30년 9월 1일 己丑", ~
  24. 趙慶男, "亂中雜錄 3, 정유년 9월 23일조", ~
  25. 李恒福, "故統制使李公遺事 白沙集 권4", ~
  26. 申炅, "再造藩邦志 4", ~
  27. 李敏敍, "鳴梁大捷碑", ~
  28. 李肯翊, "燃藜室記述 권17", ~
  29. 辛錫謙, "宣廟中興志", ~
  30. 上野市古文獻刊行會, "黙記, In 高山公實錄", pp.104~ (1998), 淸文堂
  31. 金在瑾, "續韓國船舶史硏究" (1994), 서울대학교 출판부
  32. 제장명, "임진왜란 시기 李舜臣 幕下人物의 활동", 역사와경계, (52), pp.1~45 (2004), 부산경남사학회
  33. 川口長孺, "征韓偉略 권4", 30~
  34. "沙湖集 권1", ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)