본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

朝鮮後期 ‘儀象’ 改修論의 推移

The Advancement of the I-Hsiang Renovation Theory in late Joseon Dynasty

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

From the early days, the Joseon Dynasty made efforts to repair various astronomical equipments on the basis of Confucianism political ideology. Astronomical instruments(儀象, I-hsiang) was provided an overall system during King Sejong’s era, but faced a situation where they needed to be repaired and fixed after the wars. Two ways to repair were proceeded. First was to recover the tradition of Astronomical instruments(I-hsiang) since King Sejong’s era. This was done by the restoration of Kaneuidae(equatorial torquetrum observation platform ; the observatory in the Joseon Dynasty) of Kyeongbok-Palace and other instruments around it destroyed by the wars. The most important of these was restoration and remodeling of Armillary Sphere. Min-cheol Lee’s and I-young Song’s Armillary Spheres were creative ones, both adapted tradition and change. Second was to create new astronomical instruments influenced by western astronomy and calendrical science actively brought since the mid 17th century. A simple equatorial torquetrum and the coordinates of the celestial sphere and vault, and the publication of Chien-ping-i-shuo(簡平儀說, Description of a simple equatorial torquetrum) and Hun-Kai-tung-hsien-tu-shuo(渾蓋通憲圖說, On plotting the coordinates of the celestial sphere and vault) stimulated the construction of new I-hsiang in late Joseon Dynasty. They made efforts to overcome the limits of old astronomical equipments through using western style. Not only the official Kwansanggam(觀象監, the Bureau of Astronomy and calendrical science), but individual Yangbans and mechanics attempted to build western style astronomical instruments with some achievements. Among these people were Ho-soo Seo(徐浩修, 1736~1799) of Soron faction, Ga-hwan Lee(李家煥, 1742~1801) of Keunkinamin faction, Dae-yong Hong(洪大容, 1731~1783) of Noron-Nakron faction Bukhakpa, and Cheol-jo Jeong(鄭喆祚) and Hang-ryung Jeong(鄭恒齡) who were closely connected with the others. On this process, the I-Hsiang Renovation Theory was suggested as a way to reform astronomy and calendrical science. In that background lay a recognition of the importance of actual measurements. The logic was that one needed practical astronomical equipments for a precise measurement. Ga-hwan Lee was one of the exemplary proponents of the I-Hsiang Renovation Theory. He argued for the need of introduction of new laws to reform the I-Hsiang and of mathematics. As one can identify from the names of the houses that preserved astronomical instruments, Heumgyunggak(Pavilion of respectful veneration), Jejeong Pavilion, Kyujeong Pavilion, the restorations projects of Joseon Dynasty was promoted by political purposes. Through these works, the dynasty achieved a method to tell exact time, as well as declared the legitimacy of the nation and the royal power. However, one can detect the possibility of schism in traditional arguments from the logics of the elite intellects who emphasized the importance of actual measurement. Even though they did not intend to escape from the pursuit of traditional political ideology, they were on the way to objective study which recognized the authentic value of natural studies. The historical meaning of the I-Hsiang Renovation Theory of late Joseon Dynasty came from this potentiality.

Abstract

From the early days, the Joseon Dynasty made efforts to repair various astronomical equipments on the basis of Confucianism political ideology. Astronomical instruments(儀象, I-hsiang) was provided an overall system during King Sejong’s era, but faced a situation where they needed to be repaired and fixed after the wars. Two ways to repair were proceeded. First was to recover the tradition of Astronomical instruments(I-hsiang) since King Sejong’s era. This was done by the restoration of Kaneuidae(equatorial torquetrum observation platform ; the observatory in the Joseon Dynasty) of Kyeongbok-Palace and other instruments around it destroyed by the wars. The most important of these was restoration and remodeling of Armillary Sphere. Min-cheol Lee’s and I-young Song’s Armillary Spheres were creative ones, both adapted tradition and change. Second was to create new astronomical instruments influenced by western astronomy and calendrical science actively brought since the mid 17th century. A simple equatorial torquetrum and the coordinates of the celestial sphere and vault, and the publication of Chien-ping-i-shuo(簡平儀說, Description of a simple equatorial torquetrum) and Hun-Kai-tung-hsien-tu-shuo(渾蓋通憲圖說, On plotting the coordinates of the celestial sphere and vault) stimulated the construction of new I-hsiang in late Joseon Dynasty. They made efforts to overcome the limits of old astronomical equipments through using western style. Not only the official Kwansanggam(觀象監, the Bureau of Astronomy and calendrical science), but individual Yangbans and mechanics attempted to build western style astronomical instruments with some achievements. Among these people were Ho-soo Seo(徐浩修, 1736~1799) of Soron faction, Ga-hwan Lee(李家煥, 1742~1801) of Keunkinamin faction, Dae-yong Hong(洪大容, 1731~1783) of Noron-Nakron faction Bukhakpa, and Cheol-jo Jeong(鄭喆祚) and Hang-ryung Jeong(鄭恒齡) who were closely connected with the others. On this process, the I-Hsiang Renovation Theory was suggested as a way to reform astronomy and calendrical science. In that background lay a recognition of the importance of actual measurements. The logic was that one needed practical astronomical equipments for a precise measurement. Ga-hwan Lee was one of the exemplary proponents of the I-Hsiang Renovation Theory. He argued for the need of introduction of new laws to reform the I-Hsiang and of mathematics. As one can identify from the names of the houses that preserved astronomical instruments, Heumgyunggak(Pavilion of respectful veneration), Jejeong Pavilion, Kyujeong Pavilion, the restorations projects of Joseon Dynasty was promoted by political purposes. Through these works, the dynasty achieved a method to tell exact time, as well as declared the legitimacy of the nation and the royal power. However, one can detect the possibility of schism in traditional arguments from the logics of the elite intellects who emphasized the importance of actual measurement. Even though they did not intend to escape from the pursuit of traditional political ideology, they were on the way to objective study which recognized the authentic value of natural studies. The historical meaning of the I-Hsiang Renovation Theory of late Joseon Dynasty came from this potentiality.

참고문헌 (91)

  1. "世宗實錄", ~
  2. "朝鮮王朝實錄" (1972), 國史編纂委員會
  3. "孝宗實錄 卷15", ~
  4. "英祖實錄", ~
  5. "明谷集", ~
  6. "(影印標點)韓國文集叢刊", 民族文化推進會
  7. "諸家曆象集․天文類抄" (1983), 誠信女子大學校 出版部
  8. 韓永浩, "朝鮮朝의 渾天儀 硏究", 學術誌(人文․社會篇), 39 (1995), 건국대학교
  9. 韓永浩, "조선의 천문시계 연구-水激式 渾天時計-", 韓國史硏究, 113 (2001), 韓國史硏究會
  10. "硏經齋全集", ~
  11. "左蘇山人文集" (1992), 亞細亞文化社
  12. "中宗實錄", ~
  13. "增補文獻備考", ~
  14. "明宗實錄", ~
  15. "泛虛亭集", ~
  16. "退溪集", ~
  17. "耻齋遺稿 卷2", ~
  18. "龍門集 卷6", ~
  19. "宣祖實錄 卷14", ~
  20. "靑溪集 卷3", ~
  21. "藥圃集", ~
  22. 李端夏, "玉山詩稿 附錄", ~
  23. "白沙集 卷2", ~
  24. 구만옥, "崔攸之(1603∼1673)의 竹圓子-17세기 중반 朝鮮의 水激式 渾天儀-", 한국사상사학, 25, pp.175~212 (2005), 한국사상사학회
  25. "顯宗實錄", ~
  26. "顯宗改修實錄", ~
  27. "息庵遺稿 卷17", ~
  28. 한영호, "조선조 중기의 渾天儀 復元 연구", 한국과학사학회지, 19(1) (1997), 한국과학사학회
  29. "仁祖實錄 卷25", ~
  30. "疎齋集 12", ~
  31. 구만옥, "조선후기 '선기옥형'에 대한 인식의 변화", 한국과학사학회지, 26(2), pp.247~273 (2004), 한국과학사학회
  32. "肅宗實錄", ~
  33. "承政院日記", ~
  34. "昆侖集 卷19", ~
  35. "西堂私載 卷6", ~
  36. "欽定大淸會典則例 卷158", ~
  37. 張柏春, "明淸測天儀器之歐化", pp.170~175 (2000), 遼寧敎育出版社
  38. "書雲觀志 卷3", ~
  39. "肅宗實錄補闕正誤 卷55", ~
  40. 전용훈, "17․18세기 서양 천문역산학의 도입과 전개-時憲曆의 수입과 시행을 중심으로-, In 韓國實學思想硏究 4(科學技術篇)", pp.301~ (2005), 혜안
  41. "五洲衍文長箋散稿", ~
  42. "景宗實錄", ~
  43. "國朝寶鑑" (1976), 세종대왕기념사업회
  44. "국역 임하필기" (1999), 민족문화추진회
  45. 鄭豪薰, "18세기 政治變亂과 蕩平政治, In 韓國 古代․中世의 支配體制와 農民(金容燮敎授停年紀念韓國史學論叢 2)", pp.569~573 (1997), 지식산업사
  46. 구만옥, "方便子 柳僖(1773~1837)의 實證的 宇宙論", 韓國學論集, 36, pp.64~68 (2002), 漢陽大學校 韓國學硏究所
  47. "書雲觀志․國朝曆象考" (1982), 誠信女子大學校 出版部
  48. "國朝曆象考 卷3", ~
  49. "正祖實錄 卷28", ~
  50. "弘齋全書", ~
  51. 문중양, "18세기 후반 조선 과학기술의 추이와 성격-정조대 정부 부문의 천문역산 활동을 중심으로-", 역사와 현실, 39, pp.213~215 (2001), 한국역사연구회
  52. "湛軒書", ~
  53. 李殷晟, "大理石製 新法地平日晷와 昭顯世子", 東方學志, 46․47․48 (1985), 延世大學校 國學硏究院
  54. "五洲衍文長箋散稿" (1982), 明文堂
  55. 叢書集成初, "渾蓋通憲圖說․簡平儀說" (1985), 中華書局
  56. 韓永浩, "朝鮮의 新法日晷와 視學의 자취", 대동문화연구, (47), pp.361~396 (2004), 대동문화연구원
  57. 이태희, "간평의(簡平儀)에 대하여", 생활문물연구 (2003), 국립민속박물관
  58. "旅菴遺稿 卷5", ~
  59. 楊普景, "『大東輿地圖』를 만들기까지", 韓國史 市民講座, 16, pp.110~111 (1995), 一潮閣
  60. "頤齋亂藁", ~
  61. "西浦集․西浦漫筆" (1971), 通文館
  62. "국역 성호사설" (1977), 민족문화추진회
  63. "梁書 卷48", ~
  64. 點校本, "朱子語類" (1994), 中華書局
  65. "中庸, 26章", ~
  66. "星湖全集", ~
  67. "연행록선집" (1976), 민족문화추진회
  68. 문중양, "18세기말 천문역산 전문가의 과학활동과담론의 역사적 성격-徐浩修와 李家煥을 중심으로-", 동방학지, (121), pp.51~84 (2003), 국학연구원
  69. "明皐全集 卷15", ~
  70. "日省錄", ~
  71. "內閣日曆", ~
  72. 구만옥, "朝鮮後期 天文曆算學의 주요 爭點-正祖의 天文策과 그에 대한 對策을 중심으로-", 한국사상사학, 27, pp.221~261 (2006), 한국사상사학회
  73. 구만옥, "조선후기 천문역산학의 개혁 방안: 정조의 천문책에 대한 대책을 중심으로", 한국과학사학회지, 11(4), pp.189~225 (2004), 한국과학사학회
  74. "隋書 卷16", ~
  75. "近畿實學淵源諸賢集 二" (2002), 成均館大學校 大東文化硏究院
  76. "晉書 卷11", ~
  77. "羣書考索 別集, 卷17", ~
  78. "明史 卷25", ~
  79. 崔相天, "貞軒 李家煥硏究-『錦帶殿策』의 분석을 중심으로-", 석사, 史學科, pp.1981
  80. 崔相天, "李家煥과 西學, In 韓國天主敎會創設二百周年紀念 韓國敎會史論文集 Ⅱ", pp.59~63 (1985), 韓國敎會史硏究所
  81. 하성래, "李家煥과 西學과의 관계, In 18세기 조선지식인의 문화의식", pp.295~298 (2001), 한양대학교 출판부
  82. "方便子遺稿 36ㄱ", ~
  83. 具萬玉, "方便子 柳僖(1773~1837)의 天文曆法論-조선후기 少論系 陽明學派 自然學의 一端-", 韓國史硏究, 113 (2001), 韓國史硏究會
  84. 문중양, "19세기의 사대부 과학자 남병철", 계간 과학사상, 33 (2000), 범양사
  85. 李魯國, "19세기 천문관계서적의 서지적 분석-남병철, 병길 형제의 저술을 중심으로-", 書誌學硏究, 22 (2001), 書誌學會
  86. 이노국, "19세기 천문수학서적 연구-남병철․남병길 저술을 중심으로-" (2006), 한국학술정보
  87. 김상혁, "조선 혼천의의 역사와 남병철의 창안", 忠北史學, 16 (2006), 忠北大學校 史學會
  88. 金文子, "朴珪壽の實學-地球儀の製作を中心に-", 朝鮮史硏究會論文集, 17 (1980), 朝鮮史硏究會
  89. 孫炯富, "<闢衛新編評語>와 <地勢儀銘幷序>에 나타난 朴珪壽의 西洋論", 歷史學報, 127 (1990), 歷史學會
  90. 金明昊, "朴珪壽의 <地勢儀銘幷序>에 대하여", 震檀學報, 82 (1996), 震檀學會
  91. 김명호, "南秉哲과 朴珪壽의 天文儀器 製作-儀器輯說을 중심으로-", 朝鮮時代史學報, 12 (2000), 朝鮮時代史學會

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)